Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Primary Care Physicians’ Use of an Informed Decision-Making Process for Prostate Cancer Screening

Robert J. Volk, Suzanne K. Linder, Michael A. Kallen, James M. Galliher, Mindy S. Spano, Patricia Dolan Mullen and Stephen J. Spann
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2013, 11 (1) 67-74; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1445
Robert J. Volk
1Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: bvolk@mdanderson.org
Suzanne K. Linder
1Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael A. Kallen
2Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
PhDMPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James M. Galliher
3American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network; Department of Sociology, University of Missouri–Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
4Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center at Denver, Denver, Colorado
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mindy S. Spano
3American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network; Department of Sociology, University of Missouri–Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia Dolan Mullen
5Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
DrPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen J. Spann
6Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
MDMBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Improving decision-making for prostate cancer screening
    Richard M. Hoffman
    Published on: 18 January 2013
  • Published on: (18 January 2013)
    Page navigation anchor for Improving decision-making for prostate cancer screening
    Improving decision-making for prostate cancer screening
    • Richard M. Hoffman, Physician

    The well-designed study by Volk and colleagues reported that 24% of the primary care physician respondents failed to discuss screening before ordering a PSA test. These findings are disconcerting because the survey was conducted in 2007, when contemporaneous guidelines were consistently encouraging informed decision-making. The respondents who screened without discussion were significantly more likely than those who discussed s...

    Show More

    The well-designed study by Volk and colleagues reported that 24% of the primary care physician respondents failed to discuss screening before ordering a PSA test. These findings are disconcerting because the survey was conducted in 2007, when contemporaneous guidelines were consistently encouraging informed decision-making. The respondents who screened without discussion were significantly more likely than those who discussed screening to cite time constraints and malpractice concerns. These are important issues, and the authors appropriately suggest that providing patients with decision aids could effectively overcome these barriers. Decision aids can provide information about prostate cancer and screening tests, the potential benefits and harms of screening, the probabilities for these outcomes, and help patients clarify and communicate their values. These decision support tools, which can be written, video, or web-based, have been shown to increase knowledge and reduce decisional conflict (1), as well as potentially facilitating shorter, more focused clinic discussions.

    Furthermore, Washington State has passed legislation recognizing that using a decision aid constitutes evidence of an informed consent. Volk and colleagues note that a lawyer, commenting on this legislation, has argued that using decision aids "establishes a higher burden of proof for patients attempting to claim that they were not adequately informed of risks or alternatives (2)." Barry and colleagues tested this hypothesis by conducting a mock trial based on the Merenstein case (3). Dr. Merenstein was a family medicine resident when he discussed prostate cancer screening with a new patient who elected not to be tested (4). When advanced cancer was subsequently detected following a PSA test ordered by another doctor—who did not discuss testing—Dr. Merenstein and his training program were successfully sued for failing to practice standard of care (though Dr. Merenstein himself was exonerated). In the mock trial, even when jurors were told that the discussion was documented in the medical record (as Dr. Merenstein did), the majority concluded that the physician had not met the standard of care and had harmed the patient. However, when the jurors were told that the patient decided against screening after viewing a decision aid (which was shown to the jurors), almost all concluded that the physician had met the standard of care.

    Screening for prostate cancer is a complex, controversial, and important health decision that should be based on the preferences of an informed patient. Health care providers should engage patients in the decision-making process—and this can be facilitated by using a decision aid.

    1. Volk RJ, Hawley ST, Kneuper S, et al. Trials of decision aids for prostate cancer screening: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2007;33(5): 428-34.
    2. Moulton B, King JS. Aligning ethics with medical decision-making: the quest for informed patient choice. J Law Med Ethics 2010;38(1): 85-97.
    3. Barry MJ, Wescott PH, Reifler EJ, Chang Y, Moulton BW. Reactions of potential jurors to a hypothetical malpractice suit: alleging failure to perform a prostate-specific antigen test. J Law Med Ethics 2008;36(2): 396-402, 214.
    4. Merenstein D. A piece of my mind. Winners and losers. JAMA 2004;291(1): 15-6.

    Competing interests:   I edit the prostate cancer screening decision aid produced by the Informed Medical Decisions Foundation

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 11 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 11 (1)
Vol. 11, Issue 1
January/February 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Primary Care Physicians’ Use of an Informed Decision-Making Process for Prostate Cancer Screening
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Primary Care Physicians’ Use of an Informed Decision-Making Process for Prostate Cancer Screening
Robert J. Volk, Suzanne K. Linder, Michael A. Kallen, James M. Galliher, Mindy S. Spano, Patricia Dolan Mullen, Stephen J. Spann
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2013, 11 (1) 67-74; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1445

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Primary Care Physicians’ Use of an Informed Decision-Making Process for Prostate Cancer Screening
Robert J. Volk, Suzanne K. Linder, Michael A. Kallen, James M. Galliher, Mindy S. Spano, Patricia Dolan Mullen, Stephen J. Spann
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2013, 11 (1) 67-74; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1445
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Primary goals, information-giving and mens understanding: a qualitative study of Australian and UK doctors varied communication about PSA screening
  • National Evidence on the Use of Shared Decision Making in Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening
  • In This Issue: How We Think and Feel Influences Patient Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Prevention
  • Person groups:
    • Older adults
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Professional practice
  • Other topics:
    • Communication / decision making

Keywords

  • prostatic neoplasms
  • decision making
  • physicians
  • primary care
  • early detection of cancer

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine