Article Information
PubMed
Published By
Print ISSN
Online ISSN
History
- Received for publication March 2, 2012
- Revision received June 7, 2012
- Accepted for publication September 10, 2012
- Published online March 18, 2013.
Copyright & Usage
© 2013 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Author Information
- John Brodersen, PhD⇑ and
- Volkert Dirk Siersma, PhD
- Research Unit and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: John Brodersen, MD, GP, PhD Research Unit and Section of General Practice Department of Public Health University of Copenhagen Øster Farimagsgade 5, 24Q Post Box 2099 DK-1014 Copenhagen, Denmark john.brodersen{at}sund.ku.dk
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Article usage
Cited By...
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Downstream healthcare use following breast cancer screening: a register-based cohort study
- Screening for breast cancer with mammography
- Breast density notification
- Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography: a cohort study with follow-up of 12-14 years in Denmark
- 'Diagnostic downshift: clinical and system consequences of extrapolating secondary care testing tactics to primary care
- Short and long-term psychosocial consequences of participating in a colorectal cancer screening programme: a matched longitudinal study
- Psychosocial consequences of invitation to colorectal cancer screening: a matched cohort study
- Targeting lung cancer screening to individuals at greatest risk: the role of genetic factors
- Toward robust mammography-based models for breast cancer risk
- Physician Perspectives on Mammography Screening for Average-Risk Women: "Like a Double-Edged Sword"
- Psychosocial consequences of false positives in the Danish Lung Cancer CT Screening Trial: a nested matched cohort study
- Influence of Mortality on Estimating the Risk of Kidney Failure in People with Stage 4 CKD
- Quality of screening mammography
- "A Natural Progression": Australian Women's Attitudes About an Individualized Breast Screening Model
- Depistage : quand les choses tournent mal
- Screening: when things go wrong
- Geographic Variation in Postoperative Imaging for Low-Risk Breast Cancer
- Factors Associated with False Positive Results on Screening Mammography in a Population of Predominantly Hispanic Women
- More than half of abnormal results from laboratory tests ordered by family physicians could be false-positive
- Competing demands and opportunities in primary care
- Demandes concurrentielles et possibilites en soins primaires
- Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis
- Authors reply to Timms and Bird
- Why cancer screening has never been shown to "save lives"--and what we can do about it
- Prevalence, Long-term Development, and Predictors of Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Mammography among Women Attending Population-Based Screening
- Diagnostic Invasiveness and Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Mammography
- National Expenditure For False-Positive Mammograms And Breast Cancer Overdiagnoses Estimated At $4 Billion A Year
- People's willingness to accept overdetection in cancer screening: population survey
- Overdetection in breast cancer screening: development and preliminary evaluation of a decision aid
- How Well Does Supplemental Screening Magnetic Resonance Imaging Work in High-Risk Women?
- The effect of information about overdetection of breast cancer on women's decision-making about mammography screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- Were Our Estimates of Overdiagnosis With Mammography Screening * in the United States "Based on Faulty Science"?
- Some more evidence of long-term psychosocial harms from receiving false-positive screening mammography results
- A false-positive on screening mammography has a negative psychosocial impact up to 3 years after receiving the all clear
- In This Issue: Finding the Sweet Spot in Health Care