Natural History of Practice Transformation: Development and Initial Testing of an Outcomes-Based Model

Katrina E. Donahue; Warren P. Newton; Ann Lefebvre; Marcus Plescia

doi:10.1370/afm.1497

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article

Compose eLetter

Title *

Author Information

Contributors
First Name and Middle Initial * First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'. Last Name * Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'. Email Address * Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com Occupation * Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Affiliation * Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.

Statement of Competing Interests

Competing interests? *

Yes

Please describe the competing interests

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

What code is in the image? *

Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

Scaling up Practice Transformation
William E. Hogg

Published on: 09 July 2013

Published on: (9 July 2013)
Page navigation anchor for Scaling up Practice Transformation
Scaling up Practice Transformation
William E. Hogg, Family Physician
I am struck by how far research in this area has come since the initial randomized controlled trials. At that early stage, our efforts to examine the processes of facilitation were to be able to report on the fidelity of the intervention delivered as compared to the study protocol. Donahue and colleagues in this paper are studying the processes of quality improvement in a way they describe as the natural history of practi...
Show More

I am struck by how far research in this area has come since the initial randomized controlled trials. At that early stage, our efforts to examine the processes of facilitation were to be able to report on the fidelity of the intervention delivered as compared to the study protocol. Donahue and colleagues in this paper are studying the processes of quality improvement in a way they describe as the natural history of practice transformation. Rather than a facilitation intervention research project they are studying a quality improvement program that is state wide.
Donahue et al's work is precisely the kind of research that is needed now in this field. We do not need more randomly controlled trials to prove that it works. We need insight to how and in what circumstances it works as a program. Given the high cost of effective QI, one wonders if the practices that are "engaged" but not improving from the effort should wait and try again when they are better able to benefit. The resources could then be applied to activated and transforming practices.
I was amused by the QI effort to discourage the geese from hanging around the parking lot of one of the practices. As a Canadian researcher I feel the need to speak up. If these were Canadian geese, the practice must invoke a very slow PDSA cycle and wait a full year before they conclude whether or not they have been successful. The geese will leave and fly north in the spring regardless of what the practices does!
Competing interests: None declared
Show Less

Competing Interests: None declared.