Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Effect of Raw Milk on Lactose Intolerance: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Sarah Mummah, Beibei Oelrich, Jessica Hope, Quyen Vu and Christopher D. Gardner
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2014, 12 (2) 134-141; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1618
Sarah Mummah
Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
MPhil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beibei Oelrich
Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica Hope
Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
MSN, NP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Quyen Vu
Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
BAH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher D. Gardner
Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cgardner@stanford.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Milk dosage protocol and outcome measures for each 8-day milk phase: full amount of milk was consumed in 1 sitting on each day.

    HBT = hydrogen breath test; Symptoms = self-reported severity of 4 symptoms: flatulence/gas, diarrhea, audible bowel sounds, and abdominal cramping.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Breath H2 results for 63 participants with self-reported lactose intolerance (mean ± SEM).

    H2 = hydrogen; SEM = standard error of the mean.

    Note: of 63 participants, 27 (43%) tested positive for lactose malabsorption, as evidenced by a rise in H2 ≥25 ppm, and 36 (57%) tested negative.

  • Figure 3a
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3a

    Breath H2 results for day 1 of each 8-day crossover phase (n = 16) (mean ± SEM).

    H2 = hydrogen; SEM = standard error of the mean.

    Note: End-alveolar air samples collected before and at 12 consecutive 20-minute intervals after ingestion of 473 mL (16 oz) of milk.

  • Figure 3b
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3b

    Breath H2 results for day 8 of each 8-day crossover phase (n = 14) (mean ± SEM).

    H2 = hydrogen; SEM = standard error of the mean.

    Note: End-alveolar air samples collected before and at 12 consecutive 20-minute intervals after ingestion of 473 mL (16 oz) of milk. All data for 2 participants who did not undergo the day-8 hydrogen breath test during one of the milk phases were omitted from this analysis.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Lactose intolerance symptom severity report following ingestion of 710 mL (24 oz) of milk on day 7 of each 8-day crossover phase (n = 13) (mean ± SEM).

    Note: Visual analog scale: 0 = no symptoms, 10 = unbearably severe symptoms. All data for 3 participants who were unable to complete one of the 710 mL (24 oz) doses were omitted from this analysis.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Composition of Milk Products per 237 mL (8 oz)

    ComponentRaw MilkPasteurized MilkSoy (Nondairy) Milk
    Energy (kcal)145145126
    Macronutrients (g)
     Fat7.87.83.9
     Protein7.87.86.8
     Carbohydrate11.611.615.5
      Sugars11.611.68.7
       Lactose11.611.60
    • Note: All milk products included sugar-free vanilla syrup flavoring in a flavoring to milk ratio of 1:31.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Breath H2 Results for Each 8-Day Crossover Phase, n = 16 (mean ± SEM)

    PhaseMilk Consumption PhasesP Valuea
    Raw (R)Pasteurized (P)Soy (S)R vs PR vs SP vs S
    AUC ∆H2b
     Day 1113 ± 2171 ± 125 ± 20.01<.001<.001
     Day 872 ± 14c74 ± 155 ± 20.9<.001<.001
    Peak ∆H2
     Day 1117 ± 2075 ± 1111 ± 40.01<.001<.001
     Day 879 ± 14d80 ± 1312 ± 30.9<.001<.001
    • ANOVA = analysis of variance; AUC ∆H2 = area under the H2 curve above baseline; Peak ∆H2 = highest H2 concentration after milk ingestion, minus baseline concentration (ppm); H2 = hydrogen; HBT = hydrogen breath test.

    • Notes: End-alveolar air samples collected before and at 12 consecutive 20-minute intervals after ingestion of 473 mL (16 oz) of milk. All data for 2 participants who did not undergo the day-8 HBT during one of the milk phases were omitted from the day-8 analysis (n = 14). In the analysis comparing days 1 and 8, all data were omitted for 1 participant in the R phase and 1 participant in the P phase analyses who did not complete the day-8 HBT in each respective phase (n = 15).

    • ↵a Group differences were tested by repeated-measures ANOVA, showing significant differences among the 3 milks in all instances (P <.001). Pairwise differences were subsequently calculated using matched pairs t tests.

    • ↵b AUC ∆H2 calculated by the linear trapezoidal method (ppm · min · 10−2).

    • ↵c Matched pair t test for day 1 vs day 8 for raw milk (n = 15): P = .05.

    • ↵d Matched pair t test for day 1 vs day 8 for raw milk (n = 15): P = .06.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Effect of Raw Milk on Lactose Intolerance: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

    Christopher Gardner , and colleagues

    Background Unpasteurized raw milk consumption has increased in popularity and emerged into a nationwide movement. This pilot study aimed to determine whether raw milk reduces lactose malabsorption and/or lactose intolerance symptoms associated with pasteurized milk.

    What This Study Found Raw milk did not reduce lactose malabsorption or lactose intolerance symptoms when compared with pasturized milk. Data on 16 adults with lactose intolerance and lactose malabsorption who underwent three eight-day milk phases (raw vs 2 controls: pasteurized milk and soy) in randomized order separated by 1-week washout periods were analyzed. Hydrogen breath testing showed higher lactose malabsorption for raw vs pasteurized milk on day 1 and comparable degrees of lactose malabsorption on day 8. Self-reported symptom severities were similar for raw and pasteurized milk on day 7. Compared to soy milk, both dairy milks caused significantly greater degrees of lactose malabsorption and intolerance symptoms.

    Implications

    • The evidence supporting raw milk consumption remains anecdotal, as do other health benefit claims for raw milk. The authors call for larger trials to confirm these findings and examine potential ethnic and racial differences.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 12 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 12 (2)
Vol. 12, Issue 2
March/April 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effect of Raw Milk on Lactose Intolerance: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Effect of Raw Milk on Lactose Intolerance: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
Sarah Mummah, Beibei Oelrich, Jessica Hope, Quyen Vu, Christopher D. Gardner
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2014, 12 (2) 134-141; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1618

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Effect of Raw Milk on Lactose Intolerance: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
Sarah Mummah, Beibei Oelrich, Jessica Hope, Quyen Vu, Christopher D. Gardner
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2014, 12 (2) 134-141; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1618
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Short-Term Dairy Elimination and Reintroduction Minimally Perturbs the Gut Microbiota in Self-Reported Lactose Intolerant Adults
  • In This Issue: Building Blocks for Improving Practice
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Adverse Outcomes Associated With Inhaled Corticosteroid Use in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Family-Based Interventions to Promote Weight Management in Adults: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India
  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Acute illness
    • Chronic illness
    • Disease pathophysiology / etiology
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods

Keywords

  • lactose intolerance
  • dairy products
  • soy milk
  • adult

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine