Article Figures & Data
Tables
Additional Files
In Brief
Frequency and Prioritization of Patient Health Risks from a Structured Health Risk Assessment
Siobhan M. Phillips , and colleagues
Background Because behavioral factors help determine health, it is important to assess patient-reported health behaviors and psychosocial well-being. The My Own Health Report (MOHR) is a new electronic or paper-based health behavior and mental health risk assessment and feedback system. In preparation for integrating the MOHR into practice, this study examined the frequency of patient risk factors, the average number of risk factors per patient, and patients' perceptions of importance, readiness to change and desire to discuss identified risks with clinicians.
What This Study Found Patients reported a consistently high number of health risks, with more than one-half of patients reporting six or more risk factors. Despite the high number of health risks, most patients were not ready to change any risk factors and few wanted to discuss risk factors with their clinicians. The most common risk was poor diet (low fruit and vegetable consumption, frequent fast food consumption or frequent sugary beverage consumption), followed by overweight/obesity. Patients were most ready to change body mass index and depression and most wanted to discuss depression and anxiety or worry.
Implications
- These findings present a challenge, given the small amount of time available for prevention in primary care, and support the need for more integrated care.
- The authors suggest the need for routine administration of health risk assessments in primary care, the importance of real world approaches for implementing their findings and connecting patients and practices to appropriate resources, and the potential added value of including patients' perspective in the allocation of these resources.
Annals Journal Club
Nov/Dec: Frequency and Prioritization of Patient Health Risks from a Structured Health Risk Assessment
The Annals of Family Medicine encourages readers to develop a learning community of those seeking to improve health care and health through enhanced primary care. You can participate by conducting a RADICAL journal club and sharing the results of your discussions in the Annals online discussion for the featured articles. RADICAL is an acronym for Read, Ask, Discuss, Inquire, Collaborate, Act, and Learn. The word radical also indicates the need to engage diverse participants in thinking critically about important issues affecting primary care and then acting on those discussions.1
HOW IT WORKS
In each issue, the Annals selects an article or articles and provides discussion tips and questions. We encourage you to take a RADICAL approach to these materials and to post a summary of your conversation in our online discussion. (Open the article online and click on "TRACK Discussion: Submit a comment.") You can find discussion questions and more information online at: http://www.AnnFamMed.org/site/AJC/.
CURRENT SELECTION
Article for Discussion
- Phillips SM, Glasgow RE, Bello G, et al. Frequency and prioritization of patient health risks from a structured health risk assessment. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(6):505-513.
Discussion Tips
This paper presents useful information on (a) patient priorities in addressing their health behaviors and (b) the frequency of health risks in primary care. Do the data make a compelling case in support of an integrated care approach?
Discussion Questions
- What question is asked by this study and why does it matter?
- How does this study advance beyond previous research and clinical practice on this topic?
- How strong is the study design for answering the question?
- To what degree can the findings be accounted for by:
- How patients were selected or how many chose to participate?
- How the main variables were measured?
- Confounding (false attribution of causality because 2 variables discovered to be associated actually are associated with a 3rd factor)?
- Chance?
- How the findings were interpreted?
- What are the main study findings?
- How comparable is the study sample to similar patients in your practice? What is your judgment about the transportability of the findings?
- What contextual factors are important for interpreting the findings?
- How might this study change your practice? In particular, will the study inform your approach to helping patients identify and address specific health risks?
- How might this study change policy? Education? Research?
- Who the constituencies are for the findings, and how might they be engaged in interpreting or using the findings?
- What researchable questions remain?
References
- Stange KC, Miller WL, McLellan LA, et al. Annals Journal Club: It's time to get RADICAL. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4(3):196-197 http://annfammed.org/content/4/3/196.full.