Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Review ArticleSystematic Reviews

Effectiveness of Psychological Treatments for Depressive Disorders in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Klaus Linde, Kirsten Sigterman, Levente Kriston, Gerta Rücker, Susanne Jamil, Karin Meissner and Antonius Schneider
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2015, 13 (1) 56-68; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1719
Klaus Linde
1Institute of General Practice, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Klaus.Linde@tum.de
Kirsten Sigterman
1Institute of General Practice, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Levente Kriston
2Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerta Rücker
3Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susanne Jamil
1Institute of General Practice, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karin Meissner
1Institute of General Practice, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
4Institute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonius Schneider
1Institute of General Practice, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Author Response to LP Hoelzel
    Klaus Linde
    Published on: 06 February 2015
  • Remarks to "Effectiveness of Psychological Treatments for Depressive Disorders in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" by Klaus Linde et al.
    Lars P. Hoelzel
    Published on: 05 February 2015
  • Published on: (6 February 2015)
    Page navigation anchor for Author Response to LP Hoelzel
    Author Response to LP Hoelzel
    • Klaus Linde, Research Coordinator
    • Other Contributors:

    We thank Dr. Hoelzel for his insightful comment and apologize that our wording might have lead to misinterpretations. The evidence for the effectiveness of psychological depression treatments in primary care is indeed strongly predominated by cognitive-behavioral approaches. Within the analyzed set of trials, effectiveness of the psychological interventions did not seem to vary systematically according to the theoretica...

    Show More

    We thank Dr. Hoelzel for his insightful comment and apologize that our wording might have lead to misinterpretations. The evidence for the effectiveness of psychological depression treatments in primary care is indeed strongly predominated by cognitive-behavioral approaches. Within the analyzed set of trials, effectiveness of the psychological interventions did not seem to vary systematically according to the theoretical background, intensity or delivery modes of the treatments, though most investigated interventions concepts were rather similar and the statistical power to detect such variation was low. We agree that whether our findings can be safely extrapolated to not investigated treatments (including psychodynamic and eclectic approaches), should be target of further research.

    Competing interests: None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (5 February 2015)
    Page navigation anchor for Remarks to "Effectiveness of Psychological Treatments for Depressive Disorders in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" by Klaus Linde et al.
    Remarks to "Effectiveness of Psychological Treatments for Depressive Disorders in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" by Klaus Linde et al.
    • Lars P. Hoelzel, Psychotherapy & Health Services Research Group Leader

    The systematic review by Linde et al. summarizes the evidence on psychological treatments in adult depressed primary care patients - a topic of major importance. In their methodologically sound analyses, the authors found evidence that psychological treatments are effective in depressed primary care patients and no evidence for clear differences in outcome between the investigated treatment concepts.

    Although th...

    Show More

    The systematic review by Linde et al. summarizes the evidence on psychological treatments in adult depressed primary care patients - a topic of major importance. In their methodologically sound analyses, the authors found evidence that psychological treatments are effective in depressed primary care patients and no evidence for clear differences in outcome between the investigated treatment concepts.

    Although the discussion of the results in the article is in general quite well balanced, I would like to question one conclusion the authors drew. They concluded that an "eclectic rather than a dogmatic approach should be favored". This wording might lead to a misinterpretation of the results and might be understood as if we had evidence for all psychological interventions in this setting, or evidence for freely combined different therapeutic approaches. But this is not the case.

    The main body of evidence (a total of 30 studies were included) is based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; 18 studies), problem-solving therapy (PST; 6 studies), and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT; 2 studies). Four studies were categorized as "psychosocial therapies", but there were no studies on psychodynamic or systemic therapies. CBT and PST share many characteristics and PST is sometimes even subsumed under the label of CBT. Moreover, the intervention in one of the studies (that was) categorized as "psychosocial therapy" is described as "psychoeducation", an approach closely linked to CBT and usually part of all CBT manuals.

    Therefore, the evidence for depression treatment in primary care is strongly predominated by CBT-related therapy approaches. We have no rationale to generalize the positive findings to other psychological approaches that have not been investigated.

    As none of the included studies investigated the effects of an eclectic approach, we have no direct evidence for the combination of elements from different approaches. I would therefore conclude that there is evidence for different therapeutic approaches, namely CBT, PST, and IPT. The authors found no evidence for the use of other therapies or an eclectic approach in primary care.

    Of course it is an interesting (but not surprising) finding that different approaches seem equally effective, however, we need a better understanding of common characteristics and therapeutic ingredients of different approaches in order to be able to build heuristics for combining them. To investigate the effects of other therapies or eclectic approaches in primary care might be an interesting target of future research, but these approaches cannot yet be considered evidence based.

    Competing interests: None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (1)
Vol. 13, Issue 1
January/February 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effectiveness of Psychological Treatments for Depressive Disorders in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Effectiveness of Psychological Treatments for Depressive Disorders in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Klaus Linde, Kirsten Sigterman, Levente Kriston, Gerta Rücker, Susanne Jamil, Karin Meissner, Antonius Schneider
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2015, 13 (1) 56-68; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1719

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Effectiveness of Psychological Treatments for Depressive Disorders in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Klaus Linde, Kirsten Sigterman, Levente Kriston, Gerta Rücker, Susanne Jamil, Karin Meissner, Antonius Schneider
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2015, 13 (1) 56-68; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1719
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Strategies for Implementing Integrated Behavioral Health into Health Centers
  • Implementing primary healthcare-based measurement, advice and treatment for heavy drinking and comorbid depression at the municipal level in three Latin American countries: final protocol for a quasiexperimental study (SCALA study)
  • Implementation of e-mental health interventions for informal caregivers of adults with chronic diseases: a protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review with a qualitative comparative analysis
  • Study protocol for a systematic review of evidence for digital interventions for comorbid excessive drinking and depression in community-dwelling populations
  • Brief behaviour change strategies for distressed patients in primary care
  • Mental health specialist video consultations for patients with depression or anxiety disorders in primary care: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial
  • Do psychosocial job stressors influence mental health service use? Evidence from an Australian cohort
  • Depression in primary care: part 2--management
  • Treating Subthreshold Depression in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Behavioral Activation With Mindfulness
  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of interventions for major depression in older persons: protocol for Bayesian network meta-analysis
  • Incentives and disincentives for treating of depression and anxiety in Ontario Family Health Teams: protocol for a grounded theory study
  • Approaches for synthesising complex mental health interventions in meta-analysis
  • Psychological treatments are effective for depression in primary care, study shows
  • Treatment of Depression in Primary Care
  • In This Issue: Policy and Practice
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing Among Older Persons: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
  • Accuracy of Signs and Symptoms for the Diagnosis of Acute Rhinosinusitis and Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis
  • Employment Interventions in Health Settings: A Systematic Review and Synthesis
Show more Systematic Reviews

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Mental health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • POEMs

Keywords

  • depression
  • depressive disorders
  • psychotherapy
  • cognitive therapy
  • therapeutics
  • primary health care
  • review, systematic

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine