Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Health IT–Enabled Care Coordination: A National Survey of Patient-Centered Medical Home Clinicians

Suzanne Morton, Sarah C. Shih, Chloe H. Winther, Aldo Tinoco, Rodger S. Kessler and Sarah Hudson Scholle
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2015, 13 (3) 250-256; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1797
Suzanne Morton
1National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC
MPH, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: morton@ncqa.org
Sarah C. Shih
2Primary Care Information Project, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, New York
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chloe H. Winther
3University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aldo Tinoco
4Evolent Health, Arlington, Virginia
MD, MPH, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rodger S. Kessler
5University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Hudson Scholle
1National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC
MPH, DrPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Author response Re:Misalignment between HIT design / implementation and the existing payment model
    Suzanne Morton
    Published on: 12 June 2015
  • Misalignment between HIT design / implementation and the existing payment model
    Zsolt Nagykaldi
    Published on: 13 May 2015
  • Published on: (12 June 2015)
    Page navigation anchor for Author response Re:Misalignment between HIT design / implementation and the existing payment model
    Author response Re:Misalignment between HIT design / implementation and the existing payment model
    • Suzanne Morton, Senior Health Care Analyst

    We appreciate the comments by Dr. Nagykaldi about the importance of financial incentives to help facilitate increased interoperability among EHR and other health IT systems. Support is needed first to set up these systems of interoperability and then second to encourage its use by all types of medical providers (i.e. physicians, hospitals, labs). Only then will the true benefits of care coordination be achieved.

    ...
    Show More

    We appreciate the comments by Dr. Nagykaldi about the importance of financial incentives to help facilitate increased interoperability among EHR and other health IT systems. Support is needed first to set up these systems of interoperability and then second to encourage its use by all types of medical providers (i.e. physicians, hospitals, labs). Only then will the true benefits of care coordination be achieved.

    We recommend other broader incentive programs than that of a transaction-based system of payment for individual pieces of information. The new CMS chronic care management payment allows for a monthly reimbursement to cover the costs of coordinating care with specialists and facilities and developing comprehensive care plans for patients with two or more chronic conditions.(1) CMS has also instituted a value-based payment modifier. This provides a differential payment to a physician or group of physicians under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) program based quality measures used in the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) and compared to the cost of care.(2)

    Another possible solution is to realign the economic incentives of all parties involved with health information exchanges (HIEs). Dr. Yaraghi presents an interesting business model which suggests generating revenues from HIEs by providing data services to organizations such as accountable care organizations, public health authorities, payers, and pharmaceutical companies.(3) These revenues could then be used to fund a shared savings program in which clinicians and medical data providers receive payments for providing their patients' data to the HIE. This model is similar to that used by the three major credit bureaus in the financial services industry.

    We recommend exploring multiple ways of providing both technical and financial support to practices and possibly other health care entities to learn the best approaches for improving health IT support for care coordination.

    1. Edwards ST, Landon BE. Medicare's chronic care management payment -- payment reform for primary care. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371:2049-2051.

    2. Value-Based Payment Modifier. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Website. http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service- Payment/PhysicianFeedbackProgram/ValueBasedPaymentModifier.html. Updated March 26, 2015. Accessed March 27, 2015.

    3. Yaraghi, N. A Sustainable Business Model for Health Information Exchange Platforms: The Solution to Interoperability in Healthcare IT. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 2015. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2015/01/30- sustainable-business-model-health-information-exchange-yaraghi/hie.pdf Published January 2015. Accessed June 1, 2015.

    Competing interests: I work for NCQA, which recognizes patient-centered medical homes.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (13 May 2015)
    Page navigation anchor for Misalignment between HIT design / implementation and the existing payment model
    Misalignment between HIT design / implementation and the existing payment model
    • Zsolt Nagykaldi, Director of Research

    This is an interesting and thought-provoking paper from Morton et al. It is not the first suggesting issues with how electronic health information systems are designed and implemented. Beyond the limitations of clinician self-report (without the input of office staff) and personal differences in perceptions about importance (clinician, staff and patient), the paper reinforces that there is a notion in healthcare that som...

    Show More

    This is an interesting and thought-provoking paper from Morton et al. It is not the first suggesting issues with how electronic health information systems are designed and implemented. Beyond the limitations of clinician self-report (without the input of office staff) and personal differences in perceptions about importance (clinician, staff and patient), the paper reinforces that there is a notion in healthcare that somehow the principle of "you get what you pay for" may not apply. Other recent studies have also suggested that HIT utilization patterns are closely linked to what types of clinical activities are compensated in general. Many activities that require sophisticated information systems, but reach beyond the walls of the practice (referrals, coordination of care, discharge reports, communication through care-transition) are not well supported and it stands to reason that technology that may facilitate these functions will not be developed and implemented at the same pace compared to those where various aspects of care delivery are better aligned. (See this effect in sub-specialty EHRs where the market is limited.)

    As we continue the arduous work of improving HIT design and implementation, we need to insist that we align technical architectures and use requirements with paying for the right kind of care processes these systems intend to support, perhaps through the use of the same systems (co-facilitating better care and the use of the systems for this care). This is one of the unaddressed issues with MU. One example may be health information exchange that is at the heart of electronic care coordination. In this case, a payment model could be created that would allow payments for the generation and consumption of clinical information as in the telecommunications sector (e.g., a small "transaction charge" could be instituted to create content-specific reimbursement that could be received both by senders and recipients). Support would be commensurate with the amount of work that was needed to generate or consume the information in a clinically relevant manner (e.g., filing a discharge summary in the practice, triggering and responding to clinician alerts, or sending a report to another provider). IF we think that healthcare should be market driven, there are good business models for aligning content, value, incentives, and desired outcomes through technology use.

    Competing interests: None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (3)
Vol. 13, Issue 3
May/June 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Health IT–Enabled Care Coordination: A National Survey of Patient-Centered Medical Home Clinicians
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Health IT–Enabled Care Coordination: A National Survey of Patient-Centered Medical Home Clinicians
Suzanne Morton, Sarah C. Shih, Chloe H. Winther, Aldo Tinoco, Rodger S. Kessler, Sarah Hudson Scholle
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2015, 13 (3) 250-256; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1797

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Health IT–Enabled Care Coordination: A National Survey of Patient-Centered Medical Home Clinicians
Suzanne Morton, Sarah C. Shih, Chloe H. Winther, Aldo Tinoco, Rodger S. Kessler, Sarah Hudson Scholle
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2015, 13 (3) 250-256; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1797
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • "It's Really Overwhelming": Patient Perspectives on Care Coordination
  • Modifying the Measurement Paradigm or Questioning its Very Assumptions
  • In This Issue: A Cry for Balance
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
  • Feasibility and Acceptability of the “About Me” Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Acute illness
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Health services
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Coordination / integration of care
  • Other topics:
    • Health informatics
    • Communication / decision making

Keywords

  • care coordination
  • electronic health records
  • meaningful use
  • patient-centered medical home
  • practice-based research
  • primary care
  • technology

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine