Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

The Cost of Sustaining a Patient-Centered Medical Home: Experience From 2 States

Michael K. Magill, David Ehrenberger, Debra L. Scammon, Julie Day, Tatiana Allen, Andreu J. Reall, Rhonda W. Sides and Jaewhan Kim
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2015, 13 (5) 429-435; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1851
Michael K. Magill
1University of Utah, School of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Michael.Magill@hsc.utah.edu
David Ehrenberger
2Integrated Physician Network, Louisville, Colorado
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Debra L. Scammon
1University of Utah, School of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
3University of Utah, David Eccles School of Business, Department of Marketing, Salt Lake City, Utah
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Day
4University of Utah Medical Group, Salt Lake City, Utah
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tatiana Allen
1University of Utah, School of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
CRC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreu J. Reall
3University of Utah, David Eccles School of Business, Department of Marketing, Salt Lake City, Utah
MBA Candidate
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rhonda W. Sides
5Crosslin and Associates, Nashville, Tennessee
CPA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jaewhan Kim
1University of Utah, School of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Characteristics of Study Practices (N = 20)

    CharacteristicUtah PracticesColorado Practices
    Number and type8 university-owned primary care7 private primary care practices5 FQHC network practices
    Medical home modelCare by Design (medical home)NCQA PCMH 2011 (Level III)NCQA PCMH 2011 (Level III)
    Number of annual primary care visits/practice, range12,912–38,0767,206–29,88010,433–47,777
    Number of primary care physicians/practice, range3–132–82–7
    Number of primary care physician assistants and nurse practitioners/practice, range1–41–62–12
    Number of care managers, range1–20–11.5–6
    PayersPrimarily commercial insurance; 2 practices with ≥30% MedicaidPrimarily commercial insurance≥69% Medicaid, Medicare, SCHIP
    Urgent care and/or extended hours2 evening/weekend urgent careWeekend and after hoursWeekend and after hours
    3 extended hours
    Context3 suburban, 3 urban, 2 rural4 suburban, 3 urbanUrban and suburban
    • FQHC = Federally Qualified Health Center; NCQA = National Committee for Quality Assurance; PCMH = patient-centered medical home; SCHIP = State Children’s Health Insurance Program.

    • Notes: Study practices in Utah were primary care practices including family medicine, internal medicine, and internal medicine/pediatrics. Colorado practices were full-spectrum family medicine practices; 6 did not include obstetrics. Colorado FQHC practices were full-spectrum family medicine practices and included obstetrics, pediatrics, and geriatrics. They also included on-site behavioral health and dental care and hospital care.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Cost Ratios, Staffing Ratios, and Practice Staff by State and Practice

    OutcomeValue
    Utah practicesABCDEFGHMean
    Cost ratios
     Cost per clinician FTE, $8,3665,0018,5689,0667,2478,4235,0795,1767,698
     Cost per encounter, $30.0430.3633.0131.8630.3174.0225.7223.8332.71
     Cost PMPM, $5.022.504.404.053.654.213.062.593.85
    Staffing ratios
     MA per physician FTE2.351.351.712.333.241.811.942.522.16
     Other staff per physician FTE1.150.641.191.620.950.730.420.980.96
     NP or PA per physician FTE0.340.110.080.330.610.080.480.140.27
    Practice staff
     Physician FTE8.79.36.311.24.512.48.57.28.5
     NP and PA FTE3.01.00.53.72.81.04.11.02.1
     Resident FTE03.600003.600.9
     Nurse (PRN or manager) FTE2.02.01.05.31.04.02.51.02.5
     MA FTE22.612.610.826.014.622.516.518.017.7
     Care manager FTE1.01.01.02.01.01.01.01.01.1
     Other support staff FTE10.04.06.014.55.05.04.26.06.8
    Colorado practicesABCDEFGHMean
    Cost ratios
     Cost per clinician FTE, $7,5295,43713,05510,19013,9299,2956,5587,4649,658
     Cost per encounter, $34.1219.6550.0636.3259.3437.1823.5719.0436.68
     Cost PMPM, $3.802.716.084.966.964.653.283.734.83
    Staffing ratios
     MA per physician FTE2.001.763.161.674.983.084.003.002.96
     Other staff per physician FTE3.251.508.972.973.852.131.722.923.41
     NP or PA per physician FTE1.500.631.020.201.300.462.601.651.17
    Practice staffa
     Physician FTE2.08.022.53.03.01.31.52.03.6
     NP and PA FTE3.05.023.00.64.00.64.03.33.7
     Resident FTE000000000
     Nurse (PRN or manager) FTE04.621.0000002.1
     MA FTE4.014.071.05.015.04.06.06.010.4
     Care manager FTE1.0021.01.01.00.401.02.1
     Other support staff FTE8.512.4205.58.514.53.06.68.022.3
    • FTE = full-time equivalent; MA = medical assistant; NP = nurse practitioner; PA = physician assistant; PMPM = per member per month; PRN = pro re nata.

    • ↵a Weighted means.

    • Note: Key cost and staffing ratios are presented for individual study practices with averages calculated for each state. Numbers of staff by category are presented by practice with averages calculated for each state. Clinicians include physicians, residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. Other support staff include nurses, nurse managers, care managers, front desk staff, call center staff, information technology developers, and dieticians.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Annual Cost Per PCMH Standard Per FTE Clinician

    PCMH Standards and ElementsAnnual Cost per FTE Clinician, $
    Utah PracticesColorado PracticesAll Study Practices
    1. Enhance Access and Continuity25,65830,05928,076
     After-hours, same-day access, urgent care, electronic access, practice care team
    2. Identify and Manage Populations5,6035,6885,646
     Comprehensive health assessment, proactive outreach, use data/registries for population management
    3. Plan and Manage Care31,93538,43135,248
     Previsit planning/huddles, implement evidence-based guidelines, identify high-risk patients, care management, medication reconciliation
    4. Provide Self-Care Support and Community Resources5,71014,12410,172
     Support self-care processes (self-management, activation, education), provide referrals to community resources
    5. Track and Coordinate Care10,50318,60214,663
     Referral and test tracking, follow-up, care transitions/coordination
    6. Measure and Improve Performance12,8848,99010,994
     Measure, report performance; measure patient, family experience; implement continuous quality improvement; report externally
    Total annual cost per clinician FTE92,293115,894104,799
    • FTE = full-time equivalent; PCMH = patient-centered medical home.

    • Notes: Not all practices reported costs for each of the Factors for each of the Standards. Because average cost calculations are sensitive to the denominator used, in computing the average cost at the NCQA Standard level we excluded Factors for which no costs were reported to ensure that only actual practice costs incurred in support of each Standard were reflected in the results. Annual costs per FTE clinician for all study practices are therefore not means of Utah and Colorado practices.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Appendix

    Supplemental Appendix

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental data: Appendix - PDF file
  • The Article in Brief

    The Cost of Sustaining a Patient-Centered Medical Home: Experience From 2 States

    Michael K. Magill , and colleagues

    Background Transformation of a practice to a patient-centered medical home (PCMH) requires many changes, including new workflows, systems to improve patient access and manage patient health, and potentially added staff to perform new services. This study examines personnel costs necessary to deliver PCMH functions in a diverse group of practices in 2 states.

    What This Study Found Even partial PCMH implementation costs approximately $105,000 per full time equivalent (FTE) physician annually. PCMH costs per physician FTE were $7,691 in Utah and $9,658 in Colorado, and PCMH incremental costs per patient encounter were $32.30 and $36.68, respectively. For an assumed panel of 2,000 patients, average estimated costs per member per month were $3.85 in Utah and $4.83 in Colorado.

    Implications

    • Maintenance and ongoing support of PCMH functions require additional time and new skills, which may be provided by existing staff, additional staff or both.
    • The authors conclude that adequate compensation for ongoing and substantial incremental costs is critical for practices to sustain PCMH functions. Payment reform, they assert, is essential for primary care practices to sustain medical home services.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 13 (5)
Vol. 13, Issue 5
September/October 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Cost of Sustaining a Patient-Centered Medical Home: Experience From 2 States
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Cost of Sustaining a Patient-Centered Medical Home: Experience From 2 States
Michael K. Magill, David Ehrenberger, Debra L. Scammon, Julie Day, Tatiana Allen, Andreu J. Reall, Rhonda W. Sides, Jaewhan Kim
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2015, 13 (5) 429-435; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1851

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
The Cost of Sustaining a Patient-Centered Medical Home: Experience From 2 States
Michael K. Magill, David Ehrenberger, Debra L. Scammon, Julie Day, Tatiana Allen, Andreu J. Reall, Rhonda W. Sides, Jaewhan Kim
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2015, 13 (5) 429-435; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1851
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Impact of Alternative Payment Methodology on Primary Care Visits and Scheduling
  • Shifting Implementation Science Theory to Empower Primary Care Practices
  • The Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Framing Typology for Understanding the Structure, Function, and Outcomes of PCMHs
  • Costs of Transforming Established Primary Care Practices to Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMHs)
  • The Challenges of Measuring, Improving, and Reporting Quality in Primary Care
  • Medical Home Implementation in Small Primary Care Practices: Provider Perspectives
  • Effects of New Funding Models for Patient-Centered Medical Homes on Primary Care Practice Finances and Services: Results of a Microsimulation Model
  • Combined Regional Investments Could Substantially Enhance Health System Performance And Be Financially Affordable
  • Are We Learning More about Patient-centered Medical Homes (PCMHs), or Learning More about Primary Care?
  • In This Issue: Generalist Care Around the World
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Proactive Deprescribing Among Older Adults With Polypharmacy: Barriers and Enablers
  • Artificial Intelligence Tools for Preconception Cardiomyopathy Screening Among Women of Reproductive Age
  • Family Physicians in Focused Practice in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Level Study of Trends From 1993/1994 Through 2021/2022
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Health services
  • Other topics:
    • Patient-centered medical home

Keywords

  • patient-centered care
  • medical home
  • primary health care
  • costs and cost analysis
  • health services research

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine