Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Those Left Behind From Voluntary Medical Home Reforms in Ontario, Canada

Tara Kiran, Alexander Kopp and Richard H. Glazier
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2016, 14 (6) 517-525; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2000
Tara Kiran
1Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
2Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
3Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
MD, MSc, CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tara.kiran@utoronto.ca
Alexander Kopp
3Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard H. Glazier
1Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
2Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
3Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
4Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
5Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
MD, MPH, CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1A–D
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1A–D
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1A–D
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1A–D
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1A–D

    Percentage of patients receiving chronic disease management and prevention between 2001 and 2011 stratified by whether patient is attached to a medical home or a fee-for-service physician in 2011.

    Note: Dashed lines represent 95% confidence intervals.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Characteristics of Patients Attached to Physicians Not Practicing in a Medical Home Compared With Those Attached to a Medical Home Physician, March 31, 2011

    CharacteristicPatients Left Behind From Medical Home Reforms Patients Attached to a Medical HomeAll Ontarians
    No Primary Care Physician Visit in Past 2 YearsNoncomprehensive Fee-for-Service PhysicianComprehensive Fee-for-Service Physiciana
    Number of patients1,054,448550,329771,47110,785,68713,161,935
    Male, No. (%)656,710 (62)286,997 (52)397,770 (51)5,125,358 (48)6,466,459 (49)
    Age-group, No. (%)
     <19 y232,239 (22)283,970 (52)166,776 (22)2,230,356 (21)2,913,341 (22)
     19–44 y494,016 (47)135,814 (25)297,521 (39)3,719,174 (34)4,646,525 (35)
     45–64 y247,697 (24)86,032 (16)208,895 (27)3,192,778 (30)3,735,402 (28)
     ≥65 y80,496 (8)44,513 (8)98,279 (13)1,643,379 (15)1,866,667 (14)
    Income quintile, No. (%)
     Quintile 1 (low)258,599 (25)111,222 (20)180,884 (24)1,934,979 (18)2,485,684 (19)
     Quintile 2212,289 (20)101,052 (18)168,022 (22)2,076,000 (19)2,557,363 (19)
     Quintile 3191,687 (18)100,145 (18)154,164 (20)2,178,988 (20)2,624,984 (20)
     Quintile 4189,541 (18)112,437 (20)144,285 (19)2,326,973 (22)2,773,236 (20)
     Quintile 5 (high)192,037 (18)121,154 (22)120,968 (16)2,234,612 (21)2,668,771 (20)
     Missing data10,295 (1)4,319 (1)3,148 (<1)34,135 (<1)51,897 (<1)
    Immigration, No. (%)
     Immigrated in past 10 y101,520 (10)29,100 (5)85,024 (11)704,975 (7)920,619 (7)
     Other newcomer in past 10 y96,072 (9)17,730 (3)37,621 (5)302,996 (3)454,419 (3)
     Long-term resident856,856 (81)503,499 (92)648,826 (84)9,777,716 (91)11,786,897 (90)
    Rurality index, No. (%)
     Major urban746,503 (71)438,036 (80)643,812 (84)7,716,288 (72)9,544,639 (73)
     Nonmajor urban178,345 (17)72,985 (13)83,451 (11)2,197,486 (20)2,532,267 (19)
     Rural101,439 (10)30,984 (6)40,436 (5)800,973 (7)978,832 (7)
     Missing data28,161 (3)8,324 (2)3,772 (1)70,940 (1)111,197 (1)
    Resource Utilization Band (mean, SD)0.63 (1.11)2.71 (0.95)2.74 (0.91)2.71 (1.07)2.54 (1.20)
    ADG, No. (%)
     No utilization759,650 (72)7,573 (1)2,109 (0.3)535,415 (5)1,304,747 (10)
     1–4 (low comorbidity)266,013 (25)297,807 (54)412,041 (53)5,093,469 (47)6,069,330 (46)
     5–925,599 (2)208,188 (38)298,763 (39)4,241,021 (39)4,773,571 (36)
     >10 (high comorbidity)3,186 (<1)36,761 (7)58,558 (8)915,782 (8)1,014,287 (8)
    Chronic disease prevalence, No. (%)
     Hypertension68,855 (7)64,829 (12)149,588 (19)2,406,287 (22)2,690,300 (20)
     Congestive heart failure7,381 (1)6,714 (1)10,878 (1)196,300 (2)221,121 (2)
     Acute myocardial infarction4,112 (<1)3,907 (1)7,560 (1)132,664 (1)148,730 (1)
     COPD22,249 (2)21,518 (4)38,882 (5)660,084 (6)743,649 (6)
     Asthma88,574 (8)94,602 (17)106,000 (14)1,569,317 (15)1,858,465 (14)
     Mental illness19,613 (2)93,776 (17)158,383 (21)2,253,130 (21)2,524,459 (19)
     Diabetes and age >40 y26,822 (3)25,888 (5)60,549 (8)952,721 (9)1,065,721 (8)
    Eligible for cancer screening, No. (%)
     Cervical cancer134,717 (12.8)54,166 (10)136,071 (18)2,240,498 (21)2,565,452 (20)
     Breast cancer55,890 (5)27,053 (5)67,099 (9)1,126,105 (10)1,276,147 (10)
     Colorectal cancer172,997 (16)72,317 (13)175,023 (23)2,741,778 (25)3,162,115 (24)
    • ADG = Aggregated Diagnosis Group; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    • ↵a Comprehensive primary care indicates working at least 1 day per week, more than 50% of services or payments are for core primary care, and had billings in 7 or more activity areas.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Characteristics of Primary Care Physicians Not Practicing in a Medical Home Compared With Those Practicing in a Medical Home, March 31, 2011

    CharacteristicPhysicians Left Behind From Medical Home Reforms Physicians Practicing in a Medical HomeAll Ontario Primary Care Physicians
    Noncomprehensive Fee-for-Service PhysicianComprehensive Fee-for-Service Physiciana
    Overall, No.3,8301,2297,19312,253
    Male, No. (%)2,262 (59)717 (58)4,244 (59)7,223 (59)
     Missing data105 (3)0 (0)≤5 (<1)110 (1)
    Age-group, No. (%)
     <40 y912 (24)277 (23)1,199 (17)2,388 (20)
     40–64, y2,117 (55)666 (54)5,208 (72)7,991 (65)
     ≥65, y606 (16)283 (23)781 (11)1,670 (14)
     Missing data195 (5)≤5 (<1)≤5 (<1)204 (2)
    Canadian medical graduate, No. (%)2,754 (72)814 (66)5,376 (75)8,944 (73)
     Missing data195 (5)≤5 (<1)≤ 5 (<1)204 (2)
    Panel size, median (IQR)28 (5–118)394 (132–872)1,403 (962–1,938)879 (100–1,584)
    Panel size, No. (%)
     0–6493,605 (94)802 (65)783 (11)5,190 (42)
     650–999104 (3)163 (13)1,176 (16)1,443 (12)
     1,000–1,49969 (2)137 (11)2,017 (28)2,223 (18)
     1,500–1,99932 (1)69 (6)1,568 (22)1,669 (14)
     2,000–2,3997 (<1)20 (2)815 (11)842 (7)
     ≥2,40013 (<1)38 (3)834 (12)886 (7)
    • IQR = interquartile range.

    • ↵a Comprehensive primary care indicates working at least 1 day per week, more than 50% of services or payments are for core primary care, and had billings in 7 or more activity areas.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Quality of Care for Those Left Behind From Medical Home Reforms Compared With Those Attached to a Medical Home, March 31, 2011

    Quality of Care MeasureCrude Rate % (No.)Unadjusted RRa (95% CI)RR Adjusted for Patient Demographicsb and Comorbidityc (95% CI)
    Recommended testing for diabetes
     Comprehensive fee for service25 (12,799)0.74 (0.72–0.75)0.74 (0.73–0.75)
     Noncomprehensive fee for service23 (5,022)0.68 (0.66–0.69)0.68 (0.67–0.70)
     Attached to a medical home34 (273,789)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
    Cervical cancer screening
     Comprehensive fee for service52 (67,963)0.78 (0.77–0.78)0.79 (0.79–0.79)
     Noncomprehensive fee for service50 (26,096)0.75 (0.74–0.75)0.76 (0.75–0.76)
     Attached to a medical home66 (1,460,364)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
    Breast cancer screening
     Comprehensive fee for service58 (38,078)0.79 (0.78–0.79)0.80 (0.80–0.81)
     Noncomprehensive ffee for service60 (15,762)0.81 (0.80–0.82)0.81 (0.81–0.82)
     Attached to a medical home73 (815,225)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
    Colorectal cancer screening
     Comprehensive fee for service44 (74,929)0.70 (0.70–0.71)0.72 (0.71–0.72)
     Noncomprehensive fee for service45 (31,831)0.72 (0.72–0.73)0.73 (0.72–0.74)
     Attached to a medical home62 (1,673,652)1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
    • RR = relative risk.

    • ↵a Based on log binomial models.

    • ↵b Adjustment for the following patient demographics: age, income quintile, immigration, rurality.

    • ↵c Adjustment for the following patient comorbidities: acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, mental illness, diabetes mellitus (excluded when assessing recommended testing for diabetes), Resource Utilization Band.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Those Left Behind From Voluntary Medical Home Reforms in Ontario, Canada

    Tara Kiran , and colleagues

    Background Seeking to improve health outcomes and reduce costs, more than three-quarters of family physicians in Ontario, Canada, voluntarily transitioned from traditional fee-for-service practices to medical homes over the past decade. However, approximately one in six Ontarians are still enrolled in fee-for service practices. This study seeks to understand the characteristics and quality of care of patients who did not participate in the voluntary transition to medical homes.

    What This Study Found Patients who did not participate in the voluntary transition to medical homes, are more likely to be poor, urban, and have immigrated in the last 10 years, and less likely to receive recommended screening services, compared to patients in medical homes. Those patients with a fee-for-service physician are less likely to receive recommended testing for diabetes and less likely to receive screening for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer, compared to patients with a medical home physician. (The authors note these differences in quality of care preceded medial home reforms.) Physicians who chose not to transition to a medical home were more likely to be older, to be international medical graduates and have smaller panel sizes.

    Implications

    • The authors call for strategies to improve care for patients left behind by medical home reforms in Ontario through improved connection to primary care or improved services with their existing physician.
  • Supplemental Tables 1-3

    Supplemental Appendix, Tables 1-3

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental data: Tables 1-3 - PDF file
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 14 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 14 (6)
Vol. 14, Issue 6
November/December 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Those Left Behind From Voluntary Medical Home Reforms in Ontario, Canada
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Those Left Behind From Voluntary Medical Home Reforms in Ontario, Canada
Tara Kiran, Alexander Kopp, Richard H. Glazier
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2016, 14 (6) 517-525; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Those Left Behind From Voluntary Medical Home Reforms in Ontario, Canada
Tara Kiran, Alexander Kopp, Richard H. Glazier
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2016, 14 (6) 517-525; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2000
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Characteristics of walk-in clinic physicians and patients in Ontario: Cross-sectional study
  • Physician continuity of care in the last year of life in community-dwelling adults: retrospective population-based study
  • Characteristics of Walk-In Clinic Physicians and Patients in Ontario, Canada: A Cross-Sectional Study
  • Trends in attachment to a primary care provider in Ontario, 2008-2018: an interrupted time-series analysis
  • Walk-in clinic patient characteristics and utilization patterns in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional study
  • Characteristics and practice patterns of family physicians who provide home visits in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional study
  • Relational Continuity, Physician Payment, and Team-Based Primary Care in the Canadian Health Care System
  • Who gets access to an interprofessional team-based primary care programme for patients with complex health and social needs? A cross-sectional analysis
  • Family Physicians Stopping Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ontario, Canada
  • Physician home visits in Ontario: a cross-sectional analysis of patient characteristics and postvisit use of health care services
  • Characteristics and healthcare use of patients attending virtual walk-in clinics: a cross-sectional analysis
  • Cohort study of team-based care among marginalized people who use drugs in Ottawa
  • Alternative payment models: A path forward
  • Modes de remuneration alternatifs: Une voie a suivre
  • Did the COVID-19 pandemic result in more family physicians stopping practice? Results from Ontario, Canada
  • Primary care reform and funding equity for mental health disorders in Ontario: a retrospective observational population-based study
  • Association of physician payment model and team-based care with timely access in primary care: a population-based cross-sectional study
  • Use of the health care system by Ontario First Nations people with diabetes: a population-based study
  • Attachment to primary care and team-based primary care: Retrospective cohort study of people who experienced imprisonment in Ontario
  • Quality of primary care among individuals receiving treatment for opioid use disorder
  • Engaging primary care physicians in care coordination for patients with complex medical conditions
  • Trends in Providing Out-of-Office, Urgent After-Hours, and On-Call Care in British Columbia
  • Emergency Department Use and Enrollment in a Medical Home Providing After-Hours Care
  • Advancing Primary Care Through Alternative Payment Models: Lessons from the United States & Canada
  • Focused policy is needed to reduce inequities in primary health care access for children
  • In This Issue: Social Context; Disease Causes
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family-Based Interventions to Promote Weight Management in Adults: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India
  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
    • Prevention
  • Person groups:
    • Vulnerable populations
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy

Keywords

  • primary health care
  • access to health care
  • health care delivery
  • health care disparities
  • health policy

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine