Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Health Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Asymptomatic Screening for Hypertension and High Cholesterol and Aspirin Counseling for Primary Prevention

Steven P. Dehmer, Michael V. Maciosek, Amy B. LaFrance and Thomas J. Flottemesch
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2017, 15 (1) 23-36; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2015
Steven P. Dehmer
HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: steven.p.dehmer@healthpartners.com
Michael V. Maciosek
HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy B. LaFrance
HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas J. Flottemesch
HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Key Model Parameters

    ParameterValueSensitivity RangeaSource
    Aspirin for primary prevention of CVD and colorectal cancer
    Colorectal cancer incidence >10 y, RR0.600.76/0.47Chubak27,28
    Cardiovascular disease death, RR1.001.00/0.97Guirguis-Blake29,30
    Gastrointestinal bleed, RR1.581.95/1.29Whitlock31,32
    Hemorrhagic stroke, RR1.271.68/1.00Whitlock31,32
    Ischemic stroke, nonfatal, RR0.860.98/0.76Guirguis-Blake29,30
    Myocardial infarction, nonfatal, RR0.830.94/0.74Guirguis-Blake29,30
    Cost per screening, $29.23± 25%See text
    Treatment cost, annual, $18.23± 25%See text
    Cholesterol screening
    High-density lipoprotein, median treatment efficacy, mg/dL+1.6Not considered4S,33 Downs,34 Holdaas,32 Sever,33 Knopp,37 MRC/BHF,38 LIPID,39 Shepherd40,41
    Low-density lipoprotein, median treatment efficacy, mg/dL−49.9Not considered4S,33 Downs,34 Holdaas,32 Sever,33 Knopp,37 MRC/BHF,38 LIPID,39 Shepherd40,41
    Cost per screening, $55.56± 25%See text
    Treatment and management cost, annual, $528.00± 25%See text
    Hypertension screening
    Systolic blood pressure, median treatment efficacy, mm Hg−6.5Not consideredLiu,42 Beckett,43 MRC,44 MRC,45 PROGRESS,46 SHEP,47 Dahlof,48 Liu,49 Staessen50
    Cost per screening, $29.23± 25%See text
    Treatment and management annual cost, $278.52± 25%See text
    All services
    Aspirin use rate, primary/secondary prevention, %77/86± 10% pointsNHIS51
    Blood pressure and lipid medication use rates, primary/secondary prevention, %
     Age 18–39 y62/77± 10% pointsNHANES52–56
     Age 40–64 y84/89± 10% pointsNHANES52–56
     Age >65 y94/97± 10% pointsNHANES52–56
    Myocardial infarction cost, 1st y/ongoing, $37,095/2,490± 25%AHRQ/MEPS57
    Myocardial infarction QALY decrement, 1st y/ongoing0.3 (3 mo)/0.0± 0.1 QALYMaciosek58
    Screening and counseling acceptance rate, %90± 10% pointsAssumed
    Stroke cost, 1st y/ongoing, $18,192/5,389± 25%AHRQ/MEPS57
    Stroke QALY decrement, 1st y/ongoing0.4/0.4± 0.1 QALYMaciosek58
    Treatment effectiveness, %70± 10% pointsCalibrated assumption
    • 4S = Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study; AHRQ = Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; CVD = cardiovascular disease; MEPS = Medical Expenditure Panel Survey; NCEP = National Cholesterol Education Program; NCHS = National Center for Health Statistics; NHANES = National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; QALY = quality-adjusted life years; RR = relative risk; SHEP = Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program.

    • ↵a The sensivity range indicates the lower and upper bounds (ie, worst case/best case) used in the deterministic sensitivity analysis.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Baseline ModelHealth: CVD Risk and Event Prevalence

    VariableTotal, %Men, %Women, %Non-Hispanic White, %Non-Hispanic Black, %Hispanic %
    Hypertension
     ModelHealth: CVD29.230.028.426.145.027.5
     NHANES (2007–2010)7229.630.528.628.641.327.7
    Elevated lipid levels (LDL ≥130)
     ModelHealth: CVD29.827.831.629.629.930.2
     NHANES (2009–2012)531.731.032.030.732.235.3
    Coronary heart disease
     ModelHealth: CVD6.58.64.76.37.26.7
     BRFSS (2010)736.07.84.65.86.56.1
    Stroke
     ModelHealth: CVD2.52.62.42.34.12.3
     BRFSS (2010)742.62.72.62.43.92.5
    • BRFSS = Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System; CVD = cardiovascular disease; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; NHANES = National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

    • Note: Risk factor and event prevalence rates are age-adjusted. ModelHealth: CVD data are generated from a birth cohort starting at age 18 years.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Predicted Lifetime Health and Cost Outcomes of CVD Clinical Preventive Services in US Population Groups

    Preventive ServiceUS AdultsMenWomen
    Non-Hispanic WhiteNon-Hispanic BlackHispanicNon-Hispanic WhiteNon-Hispanic BlackHispanic
    Aspirin for primary prevention
    Health impact, QALY2,2002,7006,8002,3003005,000100
    Cost-effectiveness, $31 saved pp50 saved pp166 saved pp47 saved pp16,700/QALY14 saved pp60,200/QALY
    CVD events, No.−530−750−2,030−840−20−530−20
     MI events−300−470−930−530−20−190−10
     Stroke events−100−110−420−110Longevitya−240−10
     CVD deaths−80−110−340−150−10−100−10
    CRC cases, No.−280−370−860−390−80−370−20
    Persons treated for primary prevention, No.15,60022,00039,20027,5002,30021,0002,200
    Total costs, $ million−3.1−5.0−16.6−4.70.8−1.41.1
     Disease costs−5.5−7.9−21.7−8.3−0.3−4.8−0.2
     Screening costs1.11.11.11.30.81.11.1
     Treatment costs1.41.84.02.30.22.30.2
    Cholesterol screening
    Health impact, QALY14,30017,50025,60019,7007,90014,2009,100
    Cost-effectiveness, $/QALY33,80029,40022,90025,60056,50042,10048,900
    CVD events, No.−3,960−5,090−6,630−5,320−2,150−3,520−2,940
     MI events−1,500−2,150−2,860−2,070−700−960−930
     Stroke events−40−150Longevitya−40Longevitya−130−20
     CVD deaths−1,010−1,120−1,450−1,220−820−1,120−630
    Persons treated for primary prevention, No.40,10043,30051,40045,50032,50043,10036,000
    Total costs, $ million80.189.0106.490.161.390.965.1
     Disease costs−36.3−51.5−76.4−58.8−12.1−22.6−21.9
     Screening costs16.117.718.618.513.118.214.4
     Treatment and management costs100.3122.8164.3130.360.295.472.5
    Hypertension screening
    Health impact, QALY15,60011,80017,00014,90016,50024,70016,300
    Cost-effectiveness, $/QALY48,50052,20060,60040,80048,30042,10049,500
    CVD events, No.−4,000−3,460−3,740−4,060−3,920−5,930−4,610
     MI events−750−880−970−860−600−630−690
     Stroke events−1,020−680−860−720−1,100−2,250−1,180
     CVD deaths−1,010−780−1,080−1,040−1,070−1,480−1,080
    Persons treated for primary prevention, No.53,40046,20058,90047,90056,70064,70059,000
    Total costs, $ million122.9105.7184.6102.7119.7176.4121.6
     Disease costs−34.8−33.6−37.5−31.6−30.7−58.2−38.0
     Screening costs33.834.227.434.435.428.834.9
     Treatment and management costs124.0105.1194.799.9115.0205.9124.8
    • CRC = colorectal cancer; CVD = cardiovascular disease; MI = myocardial infarction; pp = per person; QALY = quality-adjusted life year.

    • Note: All outcomes are standardized for comparison purposes to reflect the lifetime of a 100,000 person US-representative birth cohort within each respective group starting at age 18 years. Cost-effectiveness is expressed in terms of incremental costs per QALY, unless a preventive service is cost-saving overall, in which case, it is expressed in terms of costs saved per person. All costs are expressed in 2012 US dollars.

    • ↵a Population rates in the outcome are projected to stay the same or increase slightly due to increases in life expectancy attributable to the clinical preventive service.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Relative Value of Clinical Preventive Services for CVD, by Outcome, for US Population Group

    OutcomeUS AdultsMenWomen
    Non-Hispanic WhiteNon-Hispanic BlackHispanicNon-Hispanic WhiteNon-Hispanic BlackHispanic
    Largest health impact (QALY)Hypertensiona (15,600)Cholesterol (17,500)Cholesterol (25,600)Cholesterol (19,700)Hypertension (16,500)Hypertension (24,700)Hypertension (16,300)
    Cholesterolb (14,300)Hypertension (11,800)Hypertension (17,000)Hypertension (14,900)Cholesterol (7,900)Cholesterol (14,200)Cholesterol (9,100)
    Aspirinc (2,200)Aspirin (2,700)Aspirin (6,800)Aspirin (2,300)Aspirin (300)Aspirin (5,000)Aspirin (100)
    Highest cost-effectiveness ($ saved pp, or $ per QALY)Aspirin (31 pp)Aspirin (50 pp)Aspirin (166 pp)Aspirin (47 pp)Aspirin (16,700/QALY)Aspirin (14 pp)Cholesterol (48,900/QALY)
    Cholesterol (33,800/QALY)Cholesterol (29,400/QALY)Cholesterol (22,900/QALY)Cholesterol (25,600/QALY)Hypertension (48,300/QALY)Cholesterol (42,100/QALY)Hypertension (49,500/QALY)
    Hypertension (48,500/QALY)Hypertension (52,200/QALY)Hypertension (60,600/QALY)Hypertension (40,800/QALY)Cholesterol (56,500/QALY)Hypertension (42,100/QALY)Aspirin (60,200/QALY)
    Most prevented myocardial infarctions (No.)Cholesterol (1,500)Cholesterol (2,150)Cholesterol (2,860)Cholesterol (2,070)Cholesterol (700)Cholesterol (960)Cholesterol (930)
    Hypertension (750)Hypertension (880)Hypertension (970)Hypertension (860)Hypertension (600)Hypertension (630)Hypertension (690)
    Aspirin (300)Aspirin (470)Aspirin (930)Aspirin (530)Aspirin (20)Aspirin (190)Aspirin (10)
    Most prevented strokes (No.)Hypertension (1,020)Hypertension (680)Hypertension (860)Hypertension (720)Hypertension (860)Hypertension (2,250)Hypertension (1,180)
    Aspirin (100)Cholesterol (150)Aspirin (420)Aspirin (110)Aspirin (longevityd)Aspirin (240)Cholesterol (20)
    Cholesterol (40)Aspirin (110)Cholesterol (longevityd)Cholesterol (40)Cholesterol (longevityd)Cholesterol (130)Aspirin (10)
    • CVD = cardiovascular disease; pp = per person; QALY = quality-adjusted life year.

    • Note: Preventive services are aspirin counseling, hypertension screening, and cholesterol screening. All outcomes are for the lifetime of a 100,000-person US-representative birth cohort within each respective group starting at age 18 years. Cost-effectiveness is expressed in terms of incremental costs per QALY, unless a preventive service is cost saving overall, in which case, it is expressed in terms of costs saved per person. All costs expressed in 2012 US dollars.

    • ↵a Hypertension screening and management in adults.

    • ↵b Lipid disorder screening and management in adults.

    • ↵c Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and colorectal cancer.

    • ↵d Population rates in the outcome are projected to stay the same or increase slightly because of increases in life expectancy attributable to the clinical preventive service.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Sensitivity to Key Parameter Changes

    ParameterHealth Impact QALYCost-Effectiveness $Cardiovascular Disease Event, No.Total Cost $ Million
    Aspirin for primary prevention
    Base case2,20031 saved pp−530−3.1
    Treatment efficacy
     Low20091,700/QALY−502.5
     High4,00068 saved pp−910−6.8
    Treatment effectiveness
     −10% (60% effectiveness)1,80018 saved pp−370−1.8
     +10% (80% effectiveness)2,60045 saved pp−720−4.5
    Disease costs
     −25%2,20017 saved pp−530−1.7
     +25%2,20045 saved pp−530−4.5
    Screening and medication costs
     Screening (clinic) costs, −25%2,20032 saved pp−530−3.2
     Screening (clinic) costs, +25%2,20030 saved pp−530−3.0
     Bulk aspirin (−35%), $11.93/y2,20036 saved pp−530−3.6
     Name brand aspirin (+32%), $24.04/y2,20027 saved pp−530−2.7
     No patient time cost2,20037 saved pp−530−3.7
    QALY decrements
     −0.10 QALY2,10031 saved pp−530−3.1
     +0.10 QALY2,30031 saved pp−530−3.1
    Cholesterol screening
    Base case14,30033,800/QALY−3,96080.1
    Treatment effectiveness
     −10% (60% effectiveness)12,40035,100/QALY−3,51071.8
     +10% (80% effectiveness)18,30027,200/QALY−5,14081.9
    Disease costs
     −25%14,30037,600/QALY−3,96089.2
     +25%14,30030,000/QALY−3,96071.0
    Screening, management, and medication costs
     Screening and management (clinic) costs, −25%14,30030,800/QALY−3,96073.0
     Screening and management (clinic) costs, +25%14,30036,800/QALY−3,96087.2
     Discount generic medications (−91%), $36.70/y14,3005,300/QALY−3,96012.6
     Name brand medications (+804%), $3,818.73/y14,300284,800/QALY−3,960675.1
     No patient time cost14,30028,000/QALY−3,96066.4
    QALY decrements
     −0.10 QALY13,40037,400/QALY−3,96080.1
     +0.10 QALY15,00031,400/QALY−3,96080.1
    Hypertension screening
    Base case15,60048,500/QALY−4,000122.9
    Treatment effectiveness
     −10% (60% effectiveness)11,80060,300/QALY−3,060115.7
     +10% (80% effectiveness)19,80039,700/QALY−5,100127.1
    Disease costs
     −25%15,60052,000/QALY−4,000131.6
     +25%15,60045,100/QALY−4,000114.2
    Screening, management, and medication costs
     Screening and management (clinic) costs, −25%15,60044,400/QALY−4,000112.5
     Screening and management (clinic) costs, +25%15,60052,500/QALY−4,000133.1
     Discount generic medications (−82%), $36.70/y15,60026,200/QALY−4,00066.5
     Name brand medications (+1,973%), $4,216.16/y15,600584,600/QALY−4,0001,481.0
     No patient time cost15,60034,200/QALY−4,00086.6
    QALY decrements
     −0.10 QALY14,90052,300/QALY−4,000122.9
     +0.10 QALY15,70046,800/QALY−4,000122.9
    • CE = cost-effectiveness; CVD = cardiovascular disease; pp = per person; QALY = quality-adjusted life years.

    • Note: Cost-effectiveness is expressed in terms of incremental costs per QALY, unless a preventive service is cost-saving overall, in which case, it is expressed in terms of costs saved per person. Sources for the sensitivity ranges for medication costs are described in the Supplemental Appendix (Supplemental Appendix http://www.annfammed.org/content/15/1/23/suppl/DC1). All costs are expressed in 2012 US dollars.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Appendix

    Supplemental appendix

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental data: Appendix - PDF file
  • The Article in Brief

    Health Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Asymptomatic Screening for Hypertension and High Cholesterol and Aspirin Counseling for Primary Prevention

    Steven P. Dehmer , and colleagues

    Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death and one of the greatest causes of illness in the United States today. Total direct and indirect costs are estimated to exceed $300 billion annually and total direct medical costs are projected to triple by 2030. This study updates estimates of the health and economic impact of three services recommended for preventing CVD: cholesterol screening, lipid screening, and aspirin counseling.

    What This Study Found All three services continue to rank highly among recommended preventive services for U.S. adults in primary care. Health impact is highest for hypertension screening and treatment, closely followed by cholesterol screening and treatment. Aspirin counseling has lower health impact but is cost saving. Outcomes for subgroups of the population sometimes diverge in meaningful ways from the population average. For example, findings favor hypertension over cholesterol screening for women, and opportunities to reduce disease burden across all services are greatest for the non-Hispanic black population.

    Implications

    • Clinical services to prevent CVD can avert substantial disease burden and save costs. Such services should remain among the top prevention priorities for adults in primary care.
    • Individual priorities should be tailored by taking a patient's demographic characteristics and clinical objectives into account.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (1)
Vol. 15, Issue 1
January/February 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Health Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Asymptomatic Screening for Hypertension and High Cholesterol and Aspirin Counseling for Primary Prevention
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 14 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Health Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Asymptomatic Screening for Hypertension and High Cholesterol and Aspirin Counseling for Primary Prevention
Steven P. Dehmer, Michael V. Maciosek, Amy B. LaFrance, Thomas J. Flottemesch
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2017, 15 (1) 23-36; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Health Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Asymptomatic Screening for Hypertension and High Cholesterol and Aspirin Counseling for Primary Prevention
Steven P. Dehmer, Michael V. Maciosek, Amy B. LaFrance, Thomas J. Flottemesch
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2017, 15 (1) 23-36; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2015
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Characteristics of participants who take up screening tests for diabetes and lipid disorders: a systematic review
  • Why and when to screen for cardiovascular disease in healthy individuals
  • Strategies to Prioritize Clinical Options in Primary Care
  • In This Issue: Powerful Ideas for Action
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
  • Feasibility and Acceptability of the “About Me” Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Prevention
  • Person groups:
    • Older adults
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Health services

Keywords

  • cardiovascular diseases
  • cost-effectiveness
  • aspirin
  • cholesterol
  • lipid disorders
  • hypertension
  • blood pressure, high
  • mass screening
  • primary prevention

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine