Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Uninsured Primary Care Visit Disparities Under the Affordable Care Act

Heather Angier, Megan Hoopes, Miguel Marino, Nathalie Huguet, Elizabeth A. Jacobs, John Heintzman, Heather Holderness, Carlyn M. Hood and Jennifer E. DeVoe
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2017, 15 (5) 434-442; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2125
Heather Angier
1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan Hoopes
2OCHIN, Inc, Portland, Oregon
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miguel Marino
1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathalie Huguet
1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth A. Jacobs
3University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
MD, MAPP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Heintzman
1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heather Holderness
1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: holdernh@ohsu.edu
Carlyn M. Hood
2OCHIN, Inc, Portland, Oregon
MPA, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer E. DeVoe
1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
MD, DPhil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Rates of payment type for primary care visits by race and and ethnicity.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Payment visit type after ACA implementation by race and ethnicity.

    ACA = Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; DD = difference-in-difference; DDD = difference-in-difference-in-difference. NH = non-Hispanic.

    a Statistically significant DDD estimates, minority vs NH white between expansion status (reference: pre-ACA, NH white, nonexpansion states), P <0.05.

    b All DD estimates between expansion status within racial/ethnic group (reference: pre-ACA, nonexpansion states) were significant, P <0.05.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Demographic Characteristics in 6 Nonexpansion and 10 Expansion States by Racial and Ethnic Group (2013–2015)

    Nonexpansion StatesaExpansion Statesb
    CharacteristicNH WhiteHispanicNH BlackNH WhiteHispanicNH Black
    Primary care visits per year, No.
     2013157,315176,816141,747430,373252,80995,034
     2014153,551179,038137,438460,003272,46495,155
     2015140,857182,242129,934434,072281,93894,030
     Patients, No. (%)113,119 (30.5)142,546 (38.5)92,626 (25.0)247,546 (49.5)153,453 (30.7)54,348 (10.9)
    Sex, No. (%)
     Female68,408 (60.5)90,759 (63.7)57,868 (62.5)137,750 (55.6)90,291 (58.8)29,035 (53.4)
     Male44,705 (39.5)51,783 (36.3)34,756 (37.5)109,537 (44.2)63,113 (41.1)25,274 (46.5)
     Other/unknown6 (<0.1)4 (<0.1)2 (<0.1)259 (0.1)49 (<0.1)39 (0.1)
    Age-group as of January 1, 2014, No. (%)
     19–26 y16,884 (14.9)20,329 (14.3)16,710 (18.0)38,727 (15.6)26,493 (17.3)9,309 (17.1)
     27–39 y31,881 (28.2)44,079 (30.9)26,320 (28.4)74,722 (30.2)52,973 (34.5)15,933 (29.3)
     40–64 y64,354 (56.9)78,138 (54.8)49,596 (53.5)134,097 (54.2)73,987 (48.2)29,106 (53.6)
    Primary language, No. (%)
     English112,056 (99.1)53,878 (37.8)89,794 (96.9)239,022 (96.6)62,034 (40.4)47,212 (86.9)
     Spanish0 (0)87,959 (61.7)0 (0)0 (0)90,684 (59.1)0 (0)
     Other/unknown1,063 (0.9)709 (0.5)2,832 (3.1)8,524 (3.4)735 (0.5)7,136 (13.1)
    FPL (last recorded), No. (%)
     ≥138%80,786 (71.4)115,994 (81.4)72,067 (77.8)144,784 (58.5)106,914 (69.7)42,088 (77.4)
     >138%15,061 (13.3)17,061 (12.0)11,154 (12.0)43,110 (17.4)18,045 (11.8)3,750 (6.9)
     Unknown17,272 (15.3)9,491 (6.7)9,405 (10.2)59,652 (24.1)28,494 (18.6)8,510 (15.7)
    • CHC=community health center; FPL=federal poverty level; NH=non-Hispanic.

    • Note: Wisconsin included as an expansion state because, although they did not expand Medicaid to 138% FPL, they opened enrollment to adults with eligibility criteria of 100% FPL and therefore behaved more like an expansion state than a nonexpansion state. Montana included as a nonexpansion state because they did not expand Medicaid until after our study period (expanded January 1, 2016).

    • ↵a Florida, Kansas, Missouri, North Carolina, Montana, and Texas.

    • ↵b California, Hawaii, Maryland, Minnesota, New Mexico, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington, and Wisconsin.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Primary Care Visit Rates by Payment Type and Race and Ethnicity: Expansion States

    Payment TypePre-ACA RatePost-ACA RatePost- vs Pre-ACA Within-Race RR (95% CI)Post- vs Pre-ACA Between Race DD (95% CI)
    Medicaid-insured
     NH white34.2554.761.60 (1.44–1.78)a1 [Reference]
     Hispanic21.9638.911.77 (1.56–2.02)a1.11 (0.96–1.28)
     NH black42.9560.261.40 (1.23–1.61)a0.88 (0.75–1.03)
    Uninsured
     NH white23.957.730.32 (0.25–0.42)a1 [Reference]
     Hispanic46.6130.540.66 (0.58–0.74)a2.03 (1.53–2.70)b
     NH black28.1211.460.41 (0.35–0.48)a1.26 (0.92–1.73)
    Privately insured
     NH white19.5318.940.97 (0.84–1.12)1 [Reference]
     Hispanic12.3314.991.22 (1.05–1.41)a1.25 (1.04–1.51)b
     NH black10.3111.701.14 (0.91–1.42)1.17 (0.91–1.51)
    • ACA = Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; DD = difference-in-difference; NH = non-Hispanic; RR = rate ratio.

    • Note: Generalized estimating equation models were adjusted for facility-level demographic distributions (sex, age, and federal poverty level) and state-level factors (marketplace type, 2014 minimum wage and unemployment rates, and 2013 uninsured rate), clustered by facility to account for within-facility correlation. Visit rates presented per 1,000 patients per month. DD estimates compare change between racial and ethnic groups (reference = NH white) within expansion states before and after ACA Medicaid expansion.

    • ↵a Statistically significant change post- vs pre-ACA RR, P <.05.

    • ↵b Statistically significant DD estimates (reference: pre-ACA, NH white), P <.05.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Primary Care Visit Rates by Payment Type and Race and Ethnicity: Nonexpansion States

    Payment TypePre-ACA RatePost-ACA RatePost- vs Pre-ACA Within Race RR (95% CI)Post- vs Pre-ACA Between Race DD (95% CI)
    Medicaid-insured
     NH white35.6133.640.95 (0.84–1.07)1 [Reference]
     Hispanic20.1920.000.99 (0.89–1.10)1.05 (0.92–1.20)
     NH black38.7037.590.97 (0.90–1.05)1.03 (0.91–1.17)
    Uninsured
     NH white31.7525.360.80 (0.73–0.87)a1 [Reference]
     Hispanic43.1434.050.79 (0.71–0.87)a0.99 (0.89–1.10)
     NH black31.5725.360.80 (0.69–0.94)a1.01 (0.87–1.17)
    Privately insured
     NH white12.7023.351.84 (1.46–2.32)a1 [Reference]
     Hispanic5.5220.053.63 (2.73–4.83)a1.97 (1.43–2.72)b
     NH black11.4320.571.80 (1.40–2.32)a0.98 (0.78–1.23)
    • ACA = Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; DD = difference-in-difference; NH = non-Hispanic; RR = rate ratio.

    • Note: Generalized estimating equation models were adjusted for facility-level demographic distributions (sex, age, and federal poverty level) and state-level factors (marketplace type, 2014 minimum wage and unemployment rates, and 2013 uninsured rate), clustered by facility to account for within-facility correlation. Visit rates presented per 1,000 patients per month. DD estimates compare change between racial and ethnic groups (reference = NH white) within nonexpansion states before and after ACA Medicaid expansion.

    • ↵a Statistically significant change post- vs pre-ACA RR, P <.05.

    • ↵b Statistically significant DD estimates (reference: pre-ACA, NH white), P <.05.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Uninsured Primary Care Visit Disparities Under the Affordable Care Act

    Heather Holderness , and colleagues

    Background Historically, racial and ethnic minorities in the United States have been significantly less likely to have insurance coverage than non-Hispanic whites. The Affordable Care Act was designed, in part, to reduce health disparities. This study aimed to assess changes in insurance coverage at community health center visits by race and ethnicity after Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion.

    What This Study Found Expansion of Medicaid coverage under the Affordable Care Act has contributed to sizeable decreases in medical visits in which people were uninsured. This is true across all racial and ethnic groups, although disparities remain. Using electronic health record data from 10 states that expanded Medicaid and six states that did not, the study examined 359 community health centers and 870,319 patients with more than four million visits. Rates of Medicaid-insured visits increased in expansion states for all racial/ethnic groups immediately following ACA Medicaid expansion, whereas no significant change was observed for Medicaid-insured visits for any racial/ethnic group in non-expansion states. Rates of uninsured visits decreased for all racial/ethnic groups in both expansion and non-expansion states, but the declines were more immediate and pronounced in expansion states. Specifically, rates of Medicaid-insured visits in expansion states increased 60 percent from before the Affordable Care Act to after its implementation among non-Hispanic whites, 77 percent for Hispanics, and 40 percent for non-Hispanic blacks. The most notable changes in non-expansion states were in private insurance visit rates: all racial/ethnic groups increased significantly in the post-implementation period, with Hispanics utilizing community health centers with private coverage at 3.6 times their rate prior to the ACA. This suggests that fewer Hispanic patients were eligible for Medicaid and therefore sought private coverage to comply with the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate. In spite of these improvements, disparities remain. For example, Hispanic patients had the highest uninsured visit rates before Medicaid expansion and, after Medicaid expansion, a significantly smaller decline in rates of uninsured visits than non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic blacks. Thus, gaps in Medicaid coverage appear to have continued for Hispanic patients while disparities have been reduced for non-Hispanic blacks.

    Implications

    • These findings suggest the need for continued and more equitable insurance expansion efforts to eliminate health insurance disparities.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (5)
Vol. 15, Issue 5
September/October 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Uninsured Primary Care Visit Disparities Under the Affordable Care Act
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Uninsured Primary Care Visit Disparities Under the Affordable Care Act
Heather Angier, Megan Hoopes, Miguel Marino, Nathalie Huguet, Elizabeth A. Jacobs, John Heintzman, Heather Holderness, Carlyn M. Hood, Jennifer E. DeVoe
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2017, 15 (5) 434-442; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2125

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Uninsured Primary Care Visit Disparities Under the Affordable Care Act
Heather Angier, Megan Hoopes, Miguel Marino, Nathalie Huguet, Elizabeth A. Jacobs, John Heintzman, Heather Holderness, Carlyn M. Hood, Jennifer E. DeVoe
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2017, 15 (5) 434-442; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2125
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Affordable Care Act: Effects of Insurance on Diabetes Biomarkers
  • Health Care Expenditures Among Adults With Diabetes After Oregons Medicaid Expansion
  • Prevalence of Pre-existing Conditions Among Community Health Center Patients Before and After the Affordable Care Act
  • The Impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid Expansion on Visit Rates for Diabetes in Safety Net Health Centers
  • In This Issue: Tools to Help Focus on What is Valuable
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Neighborhood Determinants of Primary Care Access in Virginia
  • Proactive Deprescribing Among Older Adults With Polypharmacy: Barriers and Enablers
  • Artificial Intelligence Tools for Preconception Cardiomyopathy Screening Among Women of Reproductive Age
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Vulnerable populations
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Health services
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Access
  • Other topics:
    • Disparities in health and health care

Keywords

  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
  • Medicaid
  • health policy
  • health insurance
  • health care disparities

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine