Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Exploring Attributes of High-Value Primary Care

Melora Simon, Niteesh K. Choudhry, Jim Frankfort, David Margolius, Julia Murphy, Luis Paita, Thomas Wang and Arnold Milstein
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2017, 15 (6) 529-534; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2153
Melora Simon
1Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Niteesh K. Choudhry
2Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jim Frankfort
3QuintilesIMS, Durham, North Carolina
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Margolius
4Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julia Murphy
1Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luis Paita
3QuintilesIMS, Durham, North Carolina
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Wang
1Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arnold Milstein
1Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: amilstein@stanford.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Characteristics of Visited Practice Sites Other Than Care Delivery Attributes

    High-Value Cohort (n=12)Average-Value Cohort (n=4)
    No. (%) Independently owned4 (33)1 (25)
    No. (%) Multi-specialty group practices6 (50)1 (25)
    No. of physicians per practice, mean (SD)7 (5)17 (27)
    No. of primary care physicians with attributed patients, mean (SD)5 (6)7 (8)
    No. of attributed patients per primary care physician, mean (SD)46 (405)599 (507)
    Case mix index, mean (SD)1.3 (0.5)1.1 (0.2)
    Allowed cost clinical risk group-adjusted O/E spending ratio, mean (SD)0.66 (0.11)0.94 (0.01)
    Mean number of quality measures applicable to each practice24 (6)33 (10)
    Weighted quality composite index O/E ratio, mean (SD)1.14 (0.04)0.99 (0.00)
    No. (%) by census region
     Midwest2 (17)1 (25)
     Northeast3 (25)1 (25)
     South3 (25)1 (25)
     West4 (33)1 (25)
    • O/E=Observed vs expected.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Per-Patient Per-Month Spending Details by Practice Cohort

    PPPM Spending, Mean (SD) $High-Value CohortAverage-Value Cohort
    Total inpatient42 (27)63 (19)
    Inpatient maternity3 (5)1 (3)
    Inpatient medical21 (15)16 (14)
    Inpatient surgical19 (18)46 (6)
    Emergency department20 (13)21 (3)
    Outpatient hospital/ambulatory surgery center48 (16)73 (39)
    Office41 (8)39 (9)
    Diagnostics44 (13)49 (13)
    Laboratory20 (6)25 (5)
    Imaging24 (9)24 (10)
    Prescription medicationsa78 (20)111 (7)
    Other20 (9)35 (18)
    • PPPM=per-patient-per-month.

    • ↵a Prescription medications includes both prescription claims and office/outpatient-administered medications/injections/infusions.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Attributes More Frequently in High-Value Practices Relative to Average-Value Practicesa

    AttributeDescription
    Expanded accessPractices offer same-day appointments and accommodate walk-ins, extend evening and weekend hours, and often take their own after-hours calls with access to their patients’ electronic medical records.
    Decision support for evidence-based medicineaThe care team ensures that patients receive all evidence-based care and treatment, often by making guideline-based reminders available to clinicians in the electronic medical record. Some practice office managers regularly run reports to identify care gaps to alert the care team to take action—such as a list of patients overdue for colorectal cancer screening. Physicians consciously avoid ordering tests that would not change management.
    Risk-stratified care managementaEach patient receives support that is matched to his or her unique needs. High-risk patients are monitored and advised by a care manager, scheduled for longer office visits, receive frequent phone checks by office staff, or in some cases, clinician home visits.
    Shared decision-making and advanced care planningWhen diagnostic and treatment options substantially differ in their consequences and cost such as care near the end of life, clinicians walk patients through likely scenarios and tradeoffs.
    Complaints are goldComplaints from patients are perceived to be as valuable as compliments, if not more so. Practices take every opportunity to encourage patient feedback.
    Comprehensive primary careClinicians practice within the full scope of their expertise, including services that primary care clinicians often refer out, such as skin biopsies, suturing, insulin initiation and stabilization, joint injections, and IUD placement. In some cases, such as treadmill testing, practices arrange training and supervision by specialists.
    Careful selection of specialistsaWhen services outside the scope of the primary care practice are necessary, primary care clinicians rely on a carefully selected list of specialists with whom they trust to follow evidence-based guidelines and remain in close contact as treatment plans develop.
    Coordinated careaCare teams monitor patients outside of primary care visits. They ensure patients complete referrals to specialists and schedule timely follow-up after unexpected hospitalizations. In some cases, they track medication adherence by communicating with pharmacies or counting refills.
    Upshifted staff rolesPhysicians are supported by a team of medical assistants, front desk staff, and in some cases, nurses and advanced practice clinicians who practice near the full potential of their education, skills, and licensure. As a result, physicians devote more time to the most complex patients.
    Standing orders and protocolsaPractices develop standing orders and protocols for uncomplicated acute illnesses and chronic disease management. Nonclinician team members use these standardized workflows to care for patients without requiring direct clinician intervention.
    Shared work spacesCare teams including clinicians and nonclinicians work together in a common work area, enabling face-to-face communication that facilitates problem-solving in real-time.
    Balanced compensationaPhysician salary is linked to value instead of only volume. Compensation reflects performance on at least one of the following components: (1) quality of care, (2) patient experience, (3) resource utilization, and (4) contribution to practice-wide improvement activities.
    Low overhead space and equipmentPractices rent modest offices and typically invest in laboratory, imaging, and other equipment only if it allows clinicians to provide care more efficiently than referring to outside services. Some practices partner with other practices to jointly operate imaging equipment at a lower cost per study.
    • IUD=intrauterine device.

    • ↵a Attributes with a statistically significant association with high-value practices compared with average-value practices.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Attribute Score Comparison–Ordinally Scored Attributesa

    AttributeHigh-Value Cohort Median (IQR)Average-Value Cohort Median (IQR)P (Mann-Whitney)
    Expanded access4 (1)3 (0.75).065
    Decision support for evidence-based medicine4 (2)3 (0.5).020
    Risk-stratified care management4 (1.125)2 (0.25).012
    Shared decision making and advanced care planning4 (0.25)3 (0.5).056
    Complaints are gold3.5 (3)2.5 (1).709
    Comprehensive care4 (0.25)3.5 (1.5).590
    Careful selection of specialists4 (1.25)3 (0.25).013
    Coordinated care4 (2)2 (0.25).006
    Upshifted staff roles5 (1)2.5 (1.5).058
    Standing orders and protocols3.5 (1)1.5 (1.25).020
    • ↵a A 5 indicated fullest implementation of the attribute; 1 indicated no implementation of the attribute.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Attribute Presence Comparison–Yes/No

    AttributeHigh-Value Cohort (n=12)Average-Value Cohort (n=4)P (Fisher’s Exact Score)
    Shared work spaces42%0.245
    Balanced compensation92%25%.027
    Low overhead on space and equipment100%50%.05

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Exploring Attributes of High-Value Primary Care

    Arnold Milstein , and colleagues

    Background To address criticisms that the US health system rewards service volume rather than value, Medicare and some private payers are defining and rewarding high value. However, little is known about what physicians can do to attain low per capita spending and favorable quality scores for Medicare and non-Medicare populations. This study set out to identify care delivery attributes associated with value as defined by payers.

    What This Study Found Six attributes of primary care delivery are associated with high value: decision support for evidence-based medicine, risk-stratified care management, careful selection of specialists, coordination of care, standing orders and protocols, and balanced physician compensation. Researchers analyzed commercial health insurance claims data from 2009 to 2011 for more than 40 million PPO patients and 53,000 primary care practice sites and found that the six statistically significant attributes relate to three themes: the need for "care traffic control" to help patients with complex conditions navigate the fragmented US health care system (risk-stratified care management, careful selection of specialists, and coordination of care), the need for tools to ease the cognitive burden of physicians and staff (decision support for evidence-based medicine and standing orders and protocols), and the importance of reimbursement based on value rather than volume (balanced compensation).

    Implications

    • According to the authors, awareness of care delivery attributes associated with high value may help physicians respond successfully to incentives from Medicare and private payers intended to lower health care spending and improve quality of care.
  • Supplemental Appendixes

    Supplemental Appendixes

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental data: Appendixes - PDF file
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (6)
Vol. 15, Issue 6
November/December 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Exploring Attributes of High-Value Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 19 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Exploring Attributes of High-Value Primary Care
Melora Simon, Niteesh K. Choudhry, Jim Frankfort, David Margolius, Julia Murphy, Luis Paita, Thomas Wang, Arnold Milstein
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2017, 15 (6) 529-534; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2153

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Exploring Attributes of High-Value Primary Care
Melora Simon, Niteesh K. Choudhry, Jim Frankfort, David Margolius, Julia Murphy, Luis Paita, Thomas Wang, Arnold Milstein
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2017, 15 (6) 529-534; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2153
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Exploring Care Attributes of Nephrologists Ranking Favorably on Measures of Value
  • In This Issue: Tech, Touch, & Templates for Understanding and Improving Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Neighborhood Determinants of Primary Care Access in Virginia
  • Proactive Deprescribing Among Older Adults With Polypharmacy: Barriers and Enablers
  • Artificial Intelligence Tools for Preconception Cardiomyopathy Screening Among Women of Reproductive Age
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Health services
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Access
    • Continuity
    • Comprehensiveness
    • Coordination / integration of care
  • Other topics:
    • Quality improvement

Keywords

  • primary health care
  • patient care team
  • health care costs
  • patient-centered care
  • guideline adherence
  • chronic disease
  • referral and consultation
  • decision making
  • specialization
  • standing orders

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine