Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Brief

Perceptions of Primary Care Notes by Patients With Mental Health Diagnoses

Jared W. Klein, Sue Peacock, Judith I. Tsui, Stephen F. O’Neill, Catherine M. DesRoches and Joann G. Elmore
The Annals of Family Medicine July 2018, 16 (4) 343-345; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2287
Jared W. Klein
1Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sue Peacock
1Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith I. Tsui
1Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen F. O’Neill
2Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine M. DesRoches
2Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joann G. Elmore
3David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jelmore@mednet.ucla.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

There are concerns regarding whether patients with mental illness should be provided with access to their electronic medical records. This study compared perceptions of patients with (n = 400) and without (n = 2,134) a mental health diagnosis regarding access to primary care clinic notes through secure online portals. Eligible participants viewed at least 1 clinic note during a 12-month period. Administrative data were used to stratify patients by mental health diagnosis. As we hypothesized, patients with and without mental health diagnoses had similar perceptions about online access to notes.

Key words
  • electronic health records
  • mental health
  • patient paticipation
  • patient portals

INTRODUCTION

Primary care providers deliver a substantial proportion of mental health care in the United States.1,2 Over the past decade, increasing numbers of primary care practices have been making electronic medical records, including clinical notes, available to patients via secure patient portals. A growing body of evidence suggests this access could help patients be more engaged in their health care.3,4 Despite the purported benefits, mental health clinicians5 and others have lingering concerns about sharing clinic notes with certain patients, specifically those with psychiatric comorbidities. We hypothesize that patients with mental health diagnoses will have similar opinions about the potential impact of reading primary care clinic notes online compared with patients without mental illness.

METHODS

In this study we analyzed data from the original OpenNotes study, which provided patients with access to their full electronic medical record, including doctors’ clinic notes, at 3 health care systems.6 Following implementation of OpenNotes, patients completed a survey regarding their perceptions of reading doctors’ notes online.6 Survey questions were developed from prior qualitative analyses.3,6 For simplification of analysis and presentation of results, 4-point Likert scale responses were dichotomized as either agree/somewhat agree or disagree/somewhat disagree.

Our analysis was restricted to patients at a single site where clinical diagnosis data were available. Eligible subjects were adult primary care patients with at least 1 clinic visit during the intervention period who reported reading at least 1 clinic note online. Mental health diagnoses were determined based on documented International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes (Supplemental Appendix 1, http://www.annfammed.org/content/16/4/343/suppl/DC1). We compared the perceptions of patients with and without mental health diagnoses following the implementation of OpenNotes.

Comparisons were initially made using the χ2 statistic for categorical dependent variables, then multivariate regression was performed to control for possible confounders. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc). The institutional review boards of the University of Washington and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center approved the study procedures.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 2,534 patients who reported reading at least 1 of their clinic notes (n = 400 with mental health diagnoses and n = 2,134 without), representing a response rate of 37%. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Most patients had positive perceptions about OpenNotes (Table 2). Patients with mental health diagnoses were significantly more likely to report worry compared with other patients (8.2% vs 5.3%; P <.029), however, after adjustment for variables independently associated with mental health diagnoses (sex, race, education, and employment) there were no differences in perceptions about access to online notes between patients with or without mental health diagnoses (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Patient Characteristics

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Comparison of Patients With and Without a Mental Health Diagnosis Who Agree/Somewhat Agree With Perception Statements Regarding OpenNotes

DISCUSSION

Compared with patients without mental health diagnoses, primary care patients with mental health diagnoses were similarly enthusiastic about the utility of reading their doctors’ notes online. Giving patients with mental illness access to their clinic notes may help them engage more actively in their treatment.7 Additionally, opportunities for improved communication between patient and care provider may enhance trust,8 which is particularly important given the stigma surrounding mental illness. Providing patient access to notes could also stimulate clinicians to craft notes that are nonjudgmental, another step in strengthening the patient-doctor relationship.9

As with any intervention, the risks of access to certain clinical information in doctors’ notes could at times outweigh the potential benefit. While we noted that patients with mental illness were more likely to worry than patients without mental illness, this association was not significant after adjusting for possible confounders. Ensuring that note contents correspond with visit conversations might reassure apprehensive patients and could even engender greater patient-doctor trust.10 Patients at imminent risk of self-harm, with profoundly decompensated mental illness, or suffering from intimate partner violence might need to have particular notes blocked from the online portal for safety reasons. Most health systems have protocols for blocking part or all of clinic notes from the patient portal, although HIPAA protects patients’ right to view their medical records with few restrictions.7

A primary limitation of this study is that the original OpenNotes study was not specifically designed to investigate the perceptions of patients with mental health disorders. Administrative data was used to identify patients with mental health problems and a broad array of mental health diagnoses was included. There was likely extensive variability in how mental health diagnoses were addressed in clinic notes. Mental illness can be under-recognized and less severe in the primary care setting compared with behavioral health practices.11 It is not known if patients’ perceptions would be different if they read psychiatrists’ or behavioral health providers’ detailed notes rather than primary care providers’ notes. Small numbers in some of the perception categories limit the interpretation of our multivariate analyses. Finally, perceptions were self-reported and gathered from early experiences of patients using secure web portals to access their medical records.

In conclusion, we found that patients with mental health diagnoses had similar perceptions about reading their primary care clinic notes as other patients. Providing online access to all patients, including those with mental illness, might contribute to greater adherence to treatment plans and patient-doctor trust, and potentially help to destigmatize mental illness. However, we need to more fully understand the spectrum of benefits and risks of clinic note access in patients with mental health problems and identify interventions to mitigate potential adverse effects of this new tool.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: authors report none.

  • Funding support: The authors gratefully acknowledge support from The Commonwealth Fund, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Peterson Center on Healthcare, and Cambia Health Foundation.

  • Supplementary Materials: Available at http://www.AnnFamMed.org/content/16/4/343/suppl/DC1/.

  • Received for publication August 8, 2017.
  • Revision received January 5, 2018.
  • Accepted for publication February 14, 2018.
  • © 2018 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Regier DA,
    2. Narrow WE,
    3. Rae DS,
    4. Manderscheid RW,
    5. Locke BZ,
    6. Goodwin FK
    . The de facto US mental and addictive disorders service system. Epidemiologic catchment area prospective 1-year prevalence rates of disorders and services. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993; 50(2): 85–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Abed Faghri NM,
    2. Boisvert CM,
    3. Faghri S
    . Understanding the expanding role of primary care physicians (PCPs) to primary psychiatric care physicians (PPCPs): enhancing the assessment and treatment of psychiatric conditions. Ment Health Fam Med. 2010; 7(1): 17–25.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Delbanco T,
    2. Walker J,
    3. Bell SK,
    4. et al
    . Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157(7): 461–470.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Wolff JL,
    2. Darer JD,
    3. Berger A,
    4. et al
    . Inviting patients and care partners to read doctors’ notes: OpenNotes and shared access to electronic medical records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017; 24(e1) e166–e172.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Dobscha SK,
    2. Denneson LM,
    3. Jacobson LE,
    4. Williams HB,
    5. Cromer R,
    6. Woods S
    . VA mental health clinician experiences and attitudes toward OpenNotes. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016; 38: 89–93.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Leveille SG,
    2. Walker J,
    3. Ralston JD,
    4. Ross SE,
    5. Elmore JG,
    6. Delbanco T
    . Evaluating the impact of patients’ online access to doctors’ visit notes: designing and executing the OpenNotes project. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012; 12: 32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Kahn MW,
    2. Bell SK,
    3. Walker J,
    4. Delbanco T
    . A piece of my mind. Let’s show patients their mental health records. JAMA. 2014; 311(13): 1291–1292.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bell SK,
    2. Mejilla R,
    3. Anselmo M,
    4. et al
    . When doctors share visit notes with patients: a study of patient and doctor perceptions of documentation errors, safety opportunities and the patient-doctor relationship. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017; 26(4): 262–270.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Klein JW,
    2. Jackson SL,
    3. Bell SK,
    4. et al
    . Your patient is now reading your note: opportunities, problems, and prospects. Am J Med. 2016; 129(10): 1018–1021.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Cromer R,
    2. Denneson LM,
    3. Pisciotta M,
    4. Williams H,
    5. Woods S,
    6. Dobscha SK
    . Trust in mental health clinicians among patients who access clinical notes online. Psychiatr Serv. 2017; 68(5): 520–523.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Vermani M,
    2. Marcus M,
    3. Katzman MA
    . Rates of detection of mood and anxiety disorders in primary care: a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2011; 13(2): 13.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 16 (4)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 16 (4)
Vol. 16, Issue 4
July/August 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Perceptions of Primary Care Notes by Patients With Mental Health Diagnoses
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Perceptions of Primary Care Notes by Patients With Mental Health Diagnoses
Jared W. Klein, Sue Peacock, Judith I. Tsui, Stephen F. O’Neill, Catherine M. DesRoches, Joann G. Elmore
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2018, 16 (4) 343-345; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2287

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Perceptions of Primary Care Notes by Patients With Mental Health Diagnoses
Jared W. Klein, Sue Peacock, Judith I. Tsui, Stephen F. O’Neill, Catherine M. DesRoches, Joann G. Elmore
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2018, 16 (4) 343-345; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2287
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Patients, clinicians and open notes: information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice
  • The Benefits and Harms of Open Notes in Mental Health: A Delphi Survey of International Experts
  • Helping clinicians and patients navigate electronic patient portals: ethical and legal principles
  • In This Issue: Teachable Moments for Patients, Practices, and Systems
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family Physicians Stopping Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ontario, Canada
  • Communication Gaps Persist Between Primary Care and Specialist Physicians
  • The Provincial Spread and Scale of the Ontario eConsult Service: Evaluation of the First 2 Years
Show more Research Brief

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • electronic health records
  • mental health
  • patient paticipation
  • patient portals

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine