Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Predicting Opioid Use Following Discharge After Cesarean Delivery

Jacqueline A. Carrico, Katharine Mahoney, Kristen M. Raymond, Shannon K. McWilliams, Lena M. Mayes, Susan K. Mikulich-Gilbertson and Karsten Bartels
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2020, 18 (2) 118-126; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2493
Jacqueline A. Carrico
1Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katharine Mahoney
1Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristen M. Raymond
2Department of Psychiatry, Division of Substance Dependence, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shannon K. McWilliams
2Department of Psychiatry, Division of Substance Dependence, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lena M. Mayes
1Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan K. Mikulich-Gilbertson
2Department of Psychiatry, Division of Substance Dependence, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
3Department of Biostatistics & Informatics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karsten Bartels
1Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
2Department of Psychiatry, Division of Substance Dependence, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: karsten.bartels@ucdenver.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Flow chart of study enrollment and follow-up.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Comparison of Patient, Procedural, and Perioperative Characteristics by Self-Reported Postdischarge Opioid Use (N = 203)

    CharacteristicLow Use (n = 90)High Use (n = 113)P Value
    Age, mean (SD) [median], y32.4 (5.7) [32]31.4 (5.3) [31].22
    Race, No. (%).93
     American Indian or Alaskan Native2 (2.2)0 (0)
     Asian4 (4.4)7 (6.2)
     Black or African American8 (8.9)5 (4.4)
     Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander1 (1.1)0 (0)
     White65 (72.2)81 (71.7)
     More than 1 race3 (3.3)6 (5.3)
     Other7 (7.8)12 (10.6)
     Unknown0 (0)2 (1.8)
     Would rather not answer0 (0)0 (0)
    Ethnicity, No. (%).83
     Hispanic18 (20)24 (21.2)
    Type of insurance, No. (%).72
     Medicare0 (0)0 (0)
     Medicaid25 (27.8)34 (30.1)
     Commercial insurer (Cigna, Aetna, Anthem, etc)63 (70.0)73 (64.6)
     Tri-Care or other government insurance2 (2.2)6 (5.3)
     Self-pay0 (0)0 (0)
     Other0 (0)0 (0)
     Unknown0 (0)0 (0)
    Preoperative opioid use, No. (%)<.02
     Yes0 (0)5 (4.4)
     No90 (100)108 (95.6)
    Preoperative benzodiazepine use, No. (%).87
     Yes1 (1.1)1 (0.9)
     No89 (98.9)112 (99.1)
    ASA physical status class, No. (%)a.70
     I0 (0)0 (0)
     II69 (76.7)84 (74.3)
     III21 (23.3)29 (25.7)
     IV0 (0)0 (0)
     V0 (0)0 (0)
    Emergency procedure, No. (%).72
     Yes6 (6.7)9 (8.0)
     No84 (93.3)104 (92.0)
    Surgery duration, mean (SD) [median], min59.5 (25.0) [57.0]55.7 (21.9) [51.0].24
    Cesarean order, No. (%).83
     Repeat42 (46.7)51 (45.1)
     Primary48 (53.3)62 (54.9)
    Associated procedure, No. (%).90
     Tubal ligation18 (20.0)18 (15.9)
     Salpingo-oophorectomy5 (5.6)11 (9.7)
     Hysterectomy0 (0)2 (1.8)
     Other3 (3.3)3 (2.7)
     None67 (74.4)85 (75.2)
    Opioids in 24 h before discharge, mean (SD) [median], MME33.0 (28.5) [30]59.3 (26.3) [60]<.001
    Any acetaminophen in 24 h before discharge, No. (%)<.001
     Yes72 (80.0)109 (96.5)
     No18 (20)4 (3.5)
    NSAIDs in 24 h before discharge, No. (%).43
     Yes88 (97.8)112 (99.1)
     No2 (2.2)1 (0.9)
    Gabapentin or pregabalin in 24 h before discharge, No. (%).70
     Yes1 (1.1)2 (1.8)
     No89 (98.9)111 (98.2)
    Discharge opioid prescribed, No. (%).54
     Oxycodone15 (16.7)19 (16.8)
     Acetaminophen-hydrocodone2 (2.2)5 (4.4)
     Acetaminophen-oxycodone69 (76.7)88 (77.9)
     Tramadol0 (0)1 (0.9)
     Other0 (0)0 (0)
     None4 (4.4)0 (0)
    Discharge opioid prescription amount, mean (SD) [median], MME195.0 (117.8) [225.0]216.8 (71.3) [225.0].28
    • ASA = American Society of Anesthesiology; MME = morphine milligram equivalent; NSAID = non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

    • a Higher class indicates poorer physical status.

    • Notes: Low use defined as ≤75 MMEs; high use defined as >75 MMEs. Comparisons of high vs low use groups were made with separate binomial regressions. Characteristics with multiple categorical variables were collapsed for statistical comparison as follows: race (white vs all other categories), type of insurance (Medicaid vs all other categories), ASA physical status (III vs II), associated procedure (any vs none), type of discharge opioid prescription (acetaminophen-hydrocodone and acetaminophen-oxycodone vs all other opioids).

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Comparison of Patient-Reported Use of Opioids and OTC Analgesics, and Pain Over Time

    MeasureWeek 1 (N = 203)Week 2 (N = 202)Week 3 (N = 201)Week 4 (N = 201)Interaction P Valuea
    Low Use (n = 90)High Use (n = 113)Low Use (n = 89)High Use (n = 113)Low Use (n = 89)High Use (n = 112)Low Use (n = 89)High Use (n = 112)
    Opioids taken,20.1146.02.732.10.9321.60.9315.9.72b
     mean (SD)(23.9)(87.5)(6.6)(53.5)(3.5)(71.2)(3.9)(52.1)
     [median], MMEs[13.1][140.0][0][7.5][0][0][0][0]
    Opioids left over,102.874.694.257.089.456.783.354.1.95
     mean (SD)(114.4)(66.6)(108.9)(63.8)(103.9)(75.3)(103.0)(91.0)
     [median], MMEs[80.6][60.0][75.0][37.5][67.5][30.0][45.0][15.0]
    OTC analgesics taken, No. (%)
     Acetaminophen21 (23.3)25 (22.1)15 (16.9)26 (23.0)14 (15.7)27 (24.1)9 (10.1)18 (16.1).11
     NSAIDs57 (63.3)72 (63.7)51 (57.3)c88 (77.9)c35 (39.3)c69 (61.6)c26 (29.2)c58 (51.8)c.03
     Both17 (18.9)16 (14.2)12 (13.5)21 (18.6)11 (12.4)19 (17.0)6 (6.7)13 (11.6).08
    PROMIS pain, T score (SE)d
     Pain intensity47.2 (5.6)51.7 (5.7)42.9 (6.5)46.9 (6.6)38.6 (6.6)43.8 (7.4)36.5 (6.6)40.5 (7.1).18b
     Pain interference58.5 (6.8)63.7 (6.1)53.0 (7.4)57.0 (7.5)48.7 (7.7)53.3 (8.2)46.0 (7.2)50.1 (8.3).36b
    • MME = milligram morphine equivalent; NSAID = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; OTC = over the counter; PROMIS = Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.

    • Notes: Low use defined as ≤75 MMEs; high use defined as >75 MMEs. Associations between high vs low self-reported opioid use and each predictor were evaluated with separate binomial regressions accounting for repeated measures.

    • ↵a Interaction of predictor by time.

    • ↵b Measures for which a modified Poisson regression approach for clustered data was implemented. Significant predictor-by-week interactions were followed with post hoc tests between groups at each week.

    • ↵c Significant (P <.002) group differences.

    • ↵d A T score of 50 is the average for the US general population, with a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate greater intensity or interference.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Patient-Reported Leftover Opioids and Storage and Disposal

    OutcomeWeek 1 (N = 203)Week 2 (N = 202)Week 3 (N = 201)Week 4 (N = 201)
    Reason for not taking any opioid pain pills, No. (%)
     My pain was controlled without taking opioid pain pills29 (14.3)96 (47.5)138 (68.7)144 (71.6)
     Side effects were too strong7 (3.4)11 (5.4)11 (5.5)11 (5.5)
     I was concerned about becoming addicted6 (3.0)4 (2.0)7 (3.5)5 (2.5)
     I was concerned because I was breastfeeding12 (5.9)21 (10.4)18 (9.0)21 (10.4)
     I had no opioid pain pills left2 (1.0)16 (7.9)27 (13.4)27 (13.4)
     Other1 (0.5)4 (2.0)8 (4.0)4 (2.0)
    Storage location of leftover opioid pain pills, No. (%)
     Cupboard or wardrobe43 (21.2)46 (22.8)45 (22.4)45 (22.4)
     Medicine cabinet/other box97 (47.8)80 (39.6)80 (39.8)67 (33.3)
     Refrigerator0 (0)1 (0.5)1 (0.5)0 (0)
     Other8 (3.9)10 (5.0)4 (2.0)4 (2.0)
     Leftover pills were disposed of11 (5.4)6 (3.0)8 (4.0)6 (3.0)
     Don’t have any leftover pain pills1 (0.5)3 (1.5)1 (0.5)1 (0.5)
    Locked storage location, No. (%)a32 (15.8)31 (15.3)26 (12.9)23 (11.4)
    Opioid disposal location, No. (%)
     Household garbage1 (0.5)1 (0.5)2 (1.0)2 (1.0)
     Sink or toilet5 (2.5)2 (1.0)5 (2.5)3 (1.5)
    Returned to pharmacy1 (0.5)1 (0.5)0 (0)0 (0)
     Returned to other medication take-back program2 (1.0)2 (1.0)1 (0.5)0 (0)
     Other2 (1.0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (0.5)
    • Note: subsamples used where appropriate.

    • a Among the subsample with any opioid pain pills leftover; denominator was 148 in week 1, 137 in week 2, 130 in week 3, 116 in week 4.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Predictors of High Opioid Use Postdischarge

    Sample and PredictorAdjusted RR (95% CI)Standard ErrorP Value
    All patients (N = 203)
     Opioid use in 24 h before discharge: per 7.5 MMEsa1.09 (1.06-1.13)0.02<.001
     Predischarge acetaminophen use2.16 (0.93-5.02)0.93.07
    Patients completing study (N = 201)
     Opioid use in 24 h before discharge: per 7.5 MMEsa1.09 (1.06-1.13)0.02<.001
     Predischarge acetaminophen use2.16 (0.93-5.01)0.93.07
    Patients reporting no preoperative opioid use (N = 198)
     Opioid use in 24 h before discharge: per 7.5 MMEsa1.10 (1.06-1.14)0.02<.001
     Predischarge acetaminophen use2.07 (0.90-4.80)0.89.09
    • MME = milligram morphine equivalent; RR = risk ratio.

    • Note: Poisson regression models that estimate adjusted risk ratios for predicting high opioid use postdischarge (>75 MMEs, equivalent to 10 oxycodone 5-mg tablets, taken over 4 weeks).

    • ↵a Equivalent to the MME of 1 oxycodone 5-mg tablet taken in the 24 hours before discharge.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Predicting Opioid Use Following Discharge After Cesarean Delivery

    Karsten Bartels , and colleagues

    Background Women who take less opioid pain medication in the 24-hour period before being discharged from the hospital after a cesarean delivery also use less opioid medication during the four weeks following discharge. Doctors prescribe opioids to most C-section patients, though the total milligram morphine equivalents they prescribe vary widely, which can unintentionally result in overprescribing pain medication. While persistent opioid use after C-section is rare, overprescribing creates a pool of uncontrolled opioids in the community, which poses a potential risk for non-medical use.

    What This Study Found A team of researchers at the University of Colorado who conducted a prospective cohort study of 203 C-section patients found that those reporting low opioid intake after discharge took on average 44% less opioids in the 24-hours prior to discharge compared with those reporting higher usage. Researchers also learned that most of the patients in the study did not properly dispose of leftover opioids.

    Implications

    • Quantifying the amount of opioids taken during the last day of hospitalization may help better inform prescribing practices for the continuation of pain medication during recovery. The researchers recommend further study to evaluate the impact of implementing such measures on prescribing practices, pain, and functional outcomes.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 18 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 18 (2)
Vol. 18, Issue 2
March/April 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predicting Opioid Use Following Discharge After Cesarean Delivery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Predicting Opioid Use Following Discharge After Cesarean Delivery
Jacqueline A. Carrico, Katharine Mahoney, Kristen M. Raymond, Shannon K. McWilliams, Lena M. Mayes, Susan K. Mikulich-Gilbertson, Karsten Bartels
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2020, 18 (2) 118-126; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2493

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Predicting Opioid Use Following Discharge After Cesarean Delivery
Jacqueline A. Carrico, Katharine Mahoney, Kristen M. Raymond, Shannon K. McWilliams, Lena M. Mayes, Susan K. Mikulich-Gilbertson, Karsten Bartels
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2020, 18 (2) 118-126; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2493
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Women's health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other topics:
    • Quality improvement
    • Clinical practice guidelines

Keywords

  • pain
  • postoperative
  • pain management
  • analgesia
  • obstetrical
  • cesarean section
  • opioids
  • controlled substances
  • analgesics
  • non-narcotic
  • practice-based research

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine