Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Continuity of Cancer Care and Collaboration Between Family Physicians and Oncologists: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Michèle Aubin, Lucie Vézina, René Verreault, Sébastien Simard, Éveline Hudon, Jean-François Desbiens, Lise Fillion, Serge Dumont, André Tourigny and Serge Daneault
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2021, 19 (2) 117-125; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2643
Michèle Aubin
MD, PhD, CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: michele.aubin@mfa.ulaval.ca
Lucie Vézina
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
René Verreault
MD, PhD, CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sébastien Simard
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Éveline Hudon
MD, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-François Desbiens
RN, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lise Fillion
RN, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Serge Dumont
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
André Tourigny
MD, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Serge Daneault
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Patient flow diagram.

    FP = family physician; IUCPQ = Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Effect of the intervention on the global assessment of interprofessional collaboration between family physician and the oncology team.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Family physician pattern of care at baseline and at the end of the study.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Effect of the intervention on patient distress based on HADS.

    HADS = Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Baseline Patient Characteristics

    CharacteristicExperimental (n = 104)Control (n = 102)P Value
    Age, mean (SD), y64.2 (9.0)64.6 (8.4).73
    Male, No. (%)
    Working status, No. (%)
    61 (58.7)58 (56.9).79
    .62
        Full-time34 (32.7)28 (27.5)
        Part-time10 (9.6)13 (12.7)
        Not working60 (57.7)61 (59.8)
    Type of lung cancer, No. (%).32
        Squamous cell carcinoma14 (13.5)22 (21.6)
        Adenomatous carcinoma53 (51.0)47 (46.1)
        Small cell carcinoma24 (23.1)23 (22.5)
        Other non-small cell carcinoma13 (12.5)10 (9.8)
    Treatment, No. (%).74
        Chemotherapy36 (34.6)43 (42.2)
        Radiation5 (4.8)4 (3.9)
        Chemotherapy and radiation57 (54.8)50 (49.0)
        No treatment6 (5.8)5 (4.9)
    Metastasis, No. (%)49 (47.1)53 (52.0).58
    TNM classification, No. (%).57
        Stage 1 and 27 (6.7)3 (2.9)
        Stage 334 (32.7)30 (29.4)
        Stage 436 (34.6)43 (42.2)
        Unclassifieda27 (26.0)26 (25.5)
    Functional status, No. (%)b.11
        Active56 (53.8)41 (40.2)
        Ambulatory but bothered by symptoms33 (31.7)36 (35.3)
        <50% bedridden11 (10.6)12 (11.8)
        ≥50% bedridden4 (3.8)12 (11.8)
        Always bedridden0 (0)1 (1.0)
    • TNM = TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors.

    • ↵aMost patients had small cell carcinoma, for which there is no TNM classification.

    • ↵bFunctional status according to Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group scale.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Baseline Patient Outcome Measures

    Outcome MeasureExperimental (n = 104)Control (n = 102)P Value
    Interprofessional collaboration, mean (SD)a3.2 (1.0)3.2 (1.0).77
    Relational continuity, mean (SD)b
        Knowledge of patient3.6 (0.8)3.5 (0.8).93
        Partnership and confidence3.9 (0.6)3.8 (0.8).17
    Pattern of care, No. (%).04
        Sequentialc13 (12.5)24 (23.5)
        Paralleld66 (63.5)48 (47.1)
        Sharede25 (24.0)30 (29.4)
    Distress, No. (%)f6 (5.8)10 (9.8).28
    Good informational continuity, No. (%)g18 (32.7)21 (36.2).7
    Good management continuity, No. (%)g43 (78.2)47 (81.0).71
    • FP = family physician.

    • ↵aScore range 1-5; a higher score indicates a better perception of interprofessional collaboration.

    • ↵bScore range 1-5; a higher score indicates a better perception of relational continuity.

    • ↵cFPs not involved when specialists are involved.

    • ↵dFPs involved with health problems unrelated to cancer.

    • ↵eFPs and oncology team both involved in cancer care.

    • ↵fDistress based on Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale. Patients with a score ≥15 (range 0-42) considered to have clinically significant distress.

    • ↵gResponses given only by patients who had seen their FP (Nexperimental = 55, Ncontrol = 58); patients with a score ≥ 4 (range 1-5) perceived good continuity.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Tables & Figures

    Supplemental Tables & Figures

    • Aubin_Supp_Tables_Figs.pdf
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (2)
Vol. 19, Issue 2
March/April 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Continuity of Cancer Care and Collaboration Between Family Physicians and Oncologists: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Continuity of Cancer Care and Collaboration Between Family Physicians and Oncologists: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
Michèle Aubin, Lucie Vézina, René Verreault, Sébastien Simard, Éveline Hudon, Jean-François Desbiens, Lise Fillion, Serge Dumont, André Tourigny, Serge Daneault
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2021, 19 (2) 117-125; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2643

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Continuity of Cancer Care and Collaboration Between Family Physicians and Oncologists: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
Michèle Aubin, Lucie Vézina, René Verreault, Sébastien Simard, Éveline Hudon, Jean-François Desbiens, Lise Fillion, Serge Dumont, André Tourigny, Serge Daneault
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2021, 19 (2) 117-125; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2643
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • What helps or hinders the communication of poor prognosis between secondary and primary care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Acute illness
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Continuity
    • Coordination / integration of care

Keywords

  • continuity of care
  • interprofessional collaboration
  • lung cancer
  • oncology care
  • family physician
  • randomized clinical trial

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine