Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Drivers of Scope of Practice in Family Medicine: A Conceptual Model

Amy Russell, Jill Fromewick, Brittney Macdonald, Stephen Kimmel, Kara Franke, Kimberly Leach and Kathy Foley
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2021, 19 (3) 217-223; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2669
Amy Russell
1HCA Healthcare, Asheville, North Carolina
2University of North Carolina (UNC) Health Sciences at MAHEC, Asheville, North Carolina
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: amy.russell2@hcahealthcare.com
Jill Fromewick
2University of North Carolina (UNC) Health Sciences at MAHEC, Asheville, North Carolina
ScD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brittney Macdonald
1HCA Healthcare, Asheville, North Carolina
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Kimmel
1HCA Healthcare, Asheville, North Carolina
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kara Franke
3ToxStrategies, Asheville, North Carolina
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kimberly Leach
2University of North Carolina (UNC) Health Sciences at MAHEC, Asheville, North Carolina
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathy Foley
2University of North Carolina (UNC) Health Sciences at MAHEC, Asheville, North Carolina
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Scope of practice of focus group participants (N = 32).

    MA = medical assistance; OB = obstetrics; OBOT = office-based opioid treatment.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Conceptual model of factors that influence desired and actual scope of practice.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Conceptual model with details of factors that influence desired and actual scope of practice.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Focus Group Participants (N = 32)

    CharacteristicsNo. (%)
    Physicians
      Female18 (56.3)
      Male14 (43.8)
    Preceptor26 (83.9)
    Type of practice
      Health system6 (18.8)
      Teaching group6 (18.8)
      Community health center5 (15.6)
      Indian health service4 (12.5)
      Health system/rural health center4 (12.5)
      Private group4 (12.5)
      Solo practice1 (3.1)
      Academic medical center1 (3.1)
      Non-clinical public health1 (3.1)
    Current primary practice locationa
      Rural14 (43.8)
      Semirural 2 (6.0)
      Urban16 (50.0)
    State of current practice
      North Carolina25 (78.1)
      Non-NC (CA, Washington DC, KS, MI, OH, VA, WI) 7 (11.9)
    • CA = California; DC = District of Columbia; KS = Kansas; MI = Michigan; NC = North Carolina; OH = Ohio; VA = Virginia; WI = Wisconsin.

    • ↵a Rural status is based on zip code of practice as provided by each focus group participant. Rural designation was defined by Federal Office of Rural Health Policy requirements and semi-rural designation was based on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Rural Health Clinics definition.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Modifiable Stressors with Support

    CategoryModifiable StressorsSupports Needed
    PersonalGaps in skills or lack of prior training for unique population needsMentorship
    Fellowships
    Access to continuing medical education
    WorkplaceOperational challenges Siloed systems of careWorkforce training
    Workplace and leadership culture bias toward specializationPhysician and organizational leadership development
    EnvironmentIsolation, lack of provider backupFellowships designed to prepare a physician for a specific community
    Health system support with partnership, networking, and clinical back up.
    Challenges associated with travel and weatherTelephonic access to support and broad system support
    PopulationComplex patient needs and social barriers to careTraining
    Team-based care including use of care managers, behavioral health, and pharmacy
    Patient and community bias for specialist careOrganizational culture that supports and advocates for full-scope practice

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Drivers of Scope of Practice in Family Medicine: A Conceptual Model


    Amy Russell , and colleagues

    Background Although new family medicine graduates intend to provide a broader scope of practice than their senior counterparts, individual family physicians’ scope of practice has been decreasing, with fewer family physicians providing basic primary care services, such pediatric and prenatal care.


    What This Study Found Russell et al conducted a study to explore family medicine graduates’ attitudes and perspectives on modifiable and non-modifiable factors that influenced their scope of practice and career choices. The authors conducted five focus group discussions with 32 family physicians and explored their attitudes and perspectives on their desired and actual scope of practice. Using a conceptual framework to understand the influences on practice scope, the authors found that personal factors played a role on desired scope while workplace, environmental and population factors influenced actual practice scope. Stressors that occurred in these four categories often caused family physicians to narrow their scope of practice. Understanding personal, environmental, workplace and population factors that influence practice scope can inform specific interventions that create desirable jobs for family physicians and improve their ability to meet changing population needs. Supportive factors of a broader-scope practice include training and access to additional medical education after training; access to mentors; strong organizational leadership; and team-based care.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (3)
Vol. 19, Issue 3
1 May 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • The Issue In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Drivers of Scope of Practice in Family Medicine: A Conceptual Model
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Drivers of Scope of Practice in Family Medicine: A Conceptual Model
Amy Russell, Jill Fromewick, Brittney Macdonald, Stephen Kimmel, Kara Franke, Kimberly Leach, Kathy Foley
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2021, 19 (3) 217-223; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2669

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Drivers of Scope of Practice in Family Medicine: A Conceptual Model
Amy Russell, Jill Fromewick, Brittney Macdonald, Stephen Kimmel, Kara Franke, Kimberly Leach, Kathy Foley
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2021, 19 (3) 217-223; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2669
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians
  • Scope of practice of Japanese primary care physicians and its associated factors: a cross-sectional study
  • Factors that influence scope-of-practice decisions of early-career family physicians: Focus group study in Canada
  • Variation in Practice Patterns of Early- and Later-Career Family Physicians
  • Factors influencing practice choices of early-career family physicians in Canada: A qualitative interview study
  • The Association of Practice Type and the Scope of Care of Family Physicians
  • Why Warfarin Should Be Managed in Primary Care
  • Intentionality Required to Equip a Diverse Physician Workforce with Tools and Infrastructure to Deliver Comprehensive Care
  • Resident and early-career family physicians focused practice choices in Canada: a qualitative study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family-Based Interventions to Promote Weight Management in Adults: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India
  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Qualitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Professional practice
  • Other topics:
    • Organizational / practice change
    • Social / cultural context

Keywords

  • family
  • rural
  • scope of practice
  • workforce

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine