Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Brief

Shared Medical Appointments and Prediabetes: The Power of the Group

Aphrodite Papadakis, Elizabeth R. Pfoh, Bo Hu, Xiaobo Liu, Michael B. Rothberg and Anita D. Misra-Hebert
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2021, 19 (3) 258-261; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2647
Aphrodite Papadakis
1Department of Family Medicine Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
2Center for Value-Based Care Research Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: papadaa@ccf.org
Elizabeth R. Pfoh
2Center for Value-Based Care Research Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bo Hu
3Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaobo Liu
3Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael B. Rothberg
2Center for Value-Based Care Research Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anita D. Misra-Hebert
2Center for Value-Based Care Research Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
3Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Shared medical appointments, which allow greater access to care and provide peer support, may be an effective treatment modality for prediabetes. We used a retrospective propensity-matched cohort analysis to compare patients attending a prediabetes shared medical appointment to usual care. Primary outcome was patient’s weight change over 24 months. Secondary outcomes included change in hemoglobin A1c, low density lipoprotein, and systolic blood pressure. The shared medical appointments group lost more weight (2.88 kg vs 1.29 kg, P = .003), and achieved greater reduction in hemoglobin A1c (−0.87% vs +0.87%, P = .001) and systolic blood pressure (−4.35 mmHg vs +0.52 mmHg, P = .044). The shared medical appointment model can be effective in treating prediabetes.

Key words:
  • insulin resistance
  • metabolic syndrome
  • prediabetic state
  • shared medical appointments

INTRODUCTION

More than 1 in 3 adults have prediabetes, and nearly three-quarters of these will progress to diabetes.1,2 Diabetic complications such as microvascular dysfunction may already be present in patients with prediabetes.3 Treatment of prediabetes, primarily weight loss, is effective, yet only 23% of patients with prediabetes are treated.4

Patients may be undertreated due to lack of physician awareness, lack of resources, and lack of time. Shared medical appointments have the potential to reach more patients and provide additional resources, including peer support. Shared medical appointments are group visits that combine a medical visit with education and discussion around a common condition.5 In type 2 diabetes, shared medical appointments have been shown to improve glycemic control and/or slow disease progression, in some cases more than usual care.3,5-7 Only 1 study, by Cole et al, has evaluated a shared medical appointment for prediabetes; both groups lost weight at 3 months, and regained some at 1 year. The weight loss difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant.8

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of shared medical appointments for prediabetes compared with a matched cohort of patients receiving usual care. We hypothesized that patients in the shared medical appointment group would lose more weight than controls. The success of shared medical appointments in diabetic patients, perhaps because of group support, led us to this hypothesis. Secondarily, we assessed the impact of attending a shared medical appointment vs usual care on gly-cosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure (SBP).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical record data of patients who had at least 2 office visits during the study period with an internist, family physician, or nurse practitioner at 1 suburban primary care practice in the Cleveland Clinic Health System from June 2012 through December 2016.

The shared medical appointment patients had an initial shared medical appointment (index visit) during the study period. This appointment lasted 90 minutes, included 8-10 patients, and was facilitated by a family physician and diabetes educator. During this initial appointment each patient received 10-15 minutes of individual discussion with the cofacilitators. Pertinent laboratory test results were reviewed with the group and personal goals were set.

Our control population consisted of patients with prediabetes who were seen for either a wellness exam (International Classification of Diseases [ICD 9/10] V70.0/Z00.00), prediabetes (790.21-.22/R73.02, 790.29/R73.03), or weight management (783.21/Z71.3, 278.00/E66.9-E66.01) within 1 month of the index visit. All patients had a HbA1c of 5.7% to 6.4% result from up to 90 days before the index visit and were excluded if they were aged <18 years, pregnant, had a prescription for any weight loss medication, or had a diagnosis of diabetes before their first HbA1c test during the study period.

We used descriptive statistics (Pearson’s χ2 test and 2 sample t-tests) to compare the unmatched shared medical appointment and control groups and 2:1 propensity matching to create comparable groups. We included baseline age, race, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, statin use, metformin use, HbA1c, and zip code (to estimate median income) in the propensity score. After propensity matching, general linear mixed effects regression models were performed to identify the effect of the shared medical appointment group on changes in weight, HbA1c, LDL, and SBP. All tests were performed at a significance level of 0.05. SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc) was used for analyses. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Cleveland Clinic.

RESULTS

A total of 2,440 controls and 69 shared medical appointment patients were eligible for matching. Before matching, the shared medical appointment group had fewer White participants than the control group (52% vs 65%, P = .006). There were no differences in age, baseline weight, BMI, HbA1c, LDL, SBP, or smoking status. More patients in the shared medical appointment group were prescribed a statin (8.7% vs 2.9%, P = .006) and metformin (2.9% vs 0.25%, P <.001) before their first visit (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Baseline Demographics

The matched cohort included 135 control patients and 68 shared medical appointment patients (Table 1). Figure 1A-D shows the baseline through 24-month outcomes based upon the linear mixed effect model. Over 24 months, shared medical appointment patients lost more weight than controls (2.88 kg vs 1.29 kg, P = .003). Control patients’ HbA1c increased by 0.87% vs a decline of 0.87% in the shared medical appointment group (P = .001). By the conclusion of the study period, 25% of shared medical appointment patients and 16% of control group patients had been prescribed metformin (P = .14). The SBP increased by 0.52 mmHg for controls and decreased by 4.35 mmHg for shared medical appointment patients (P = .04). LDL declined by 5.72 mg/dl in the control group vs 0.9 mg/dl in the shared medical appointment group (P = .63).

Figure 1 A-D.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1 A-D.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1 A-D.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1 A-D.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1 A-D.

Outcomes of matched cohorts based on linear mixed effects model.

HbA = hemoglobin A ; LDL = low density lipoprotein; SBP = systolic blood pressure; SMA = shared medical appointment.

DISCUSSION

Over a 24-month period, patients with prediabetes participating in our shared medical appointment group lost more weight and had greater reductions in HbA1c and SBP than control patients. The weight loss and HbA1c reduction were not solely attributable to medication effect, even though some patients in both groups were eventually prescribed metformin. These results differed from Cole et al’s randomized trial in which both groups lost weight at 3 months and partially regained some weight at 1 year, but the weight loss difference was not statistically significant.8

Our patient population is similar to Cole’s study of patients with prediabetes who attended shared medical appointments in terms of age (60 years vs 58 years), BMI (32 vs 31) and baseline HbA1c (6.0% vs 5.9%). A higher percentage of our patients were women (74% vs 46%). In Cole’s study the control group attended 1 counseling session with a dietician while the shared medical appointment group participated in 3 nutrition-based appointments. Our control group received usual medical care which typically does not include substantial nutrition counseling. Importantly, Cole’s study had a smaller sample size (34 shared medical appointment participants and 31 controls) which may have been underpowered to detect 1 kg of weight loss at 2 years. Our retrospective observational design leaves room for confounding variables, though we did attempt to control for this using propensity matching and conducted further analyses to determine if prescriptions started during the study could have accounted for the differences.

Our study limitations include the retrospective design, the single site of care, and possible selection bias in that patients attending a shared medical appointment may have different motivations.

In conclusion, shared medical appointments may provide an effective mode of treatment for patients diagnosed with prediabetes. The group support seems to be an important ingredient to continued progress in lifestyle modifications. As the prediabetes epidemic grows, more research is needed to determine how to best implement this option within health care systems.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: Dr Misra-Hebert reports funding from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality K08 HS024128 and reports grants from NHLBI, Novo Nordisk Inc, Merck Inc, and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc outside the submitted work. No other conflicts of interest reported by the other authors.

  • To read or post commentaries in response to this article, go to https://www.AnnFamMed.org/content/19/3/258/tab-e-letters.

  • Previous presentations: Preliminary analysis of SMA and control cohort baseline data presented at SGIM Midwest Regional Meeting; September 14, 2017; Chicago, Illinois.

  • Received for publication November 25, 2019.
  • Revision received June 9, 2020.
  • Accepted for publication June 29, 2020.
  • © 2021 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ligthart S,
    2. van Herpt TT,
    3. Leening MJ, et al.
    Lifetime risk of developing impaired glucose metabolism and eventual progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016; 4(1): 44-51.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    . CDC 2017 Diabetes Report Card. Diabestes data and statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/index.html
  3. 3.↵
    1. Sörensen BM,
    2. Houben AJ,
    3. Berendschot TT, et al.
    Prediabetes and type 2 diabetes are associated with generalized microvascular dysfunction: the Maastricht Study. Circulation. 2016; 134(18): 1339-1352.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Mainous AG III.,
    2. Tanner RJ,
    3. Baker R.
    Prediabetes diagnosis and treatment in primary care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016; 29(2): 283-285.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Trento M,
    2. Passera P,
    3. Tomalino M, et al.
    Group visits improve metabolic control in type 2 diabetes: a 2-year follow-up. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24(6): 995-1000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.
    1. Kirsh S,
    2. Watts S,
    3. Pascuzzi K, et al.
    Shared medical appointments based on the chronic care model: a quality improvement project to address the challenges of patients with diabetes with high cardiovascular risk. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007; 16(5): 349-353.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Watts SA,
    2. Strauss GJ,
    3. Pascuzzi K, et al.
    Shared medical appointments for patients with diabetes: glycemic reduction in high-risk patients. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2015; 27(8): 450-456.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Cole RE,
    2. Boyer K,
    3. Spanbauer SM,
    4. Sprague D,
    5. Bingham M.
    Effectiveness of pre-diabetes nutrition shared medical appointments: prevention of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2013; 39(3): 344-353.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 19 (3)
Vol. 19, Issue 3
1 May 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • The Issue In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Shared Medical Appointments and Prediabetes: The Power of the Group
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Shared Medical Appointments and Prediabetes: The Power of the Group
Aphrodite Papadakis, Elizabeth R. Pfoh, Bo Hu, Xiaobo Liu, Michael B. Rothberg, Anita D. Misra-Hebert
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2021, 19 (3) 258-261; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2647

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Shared Medical Appointments and Prediabetes: The Power of the Group
Aphrodite Papadakis, Elizabeth R. Pfoh, Bo Hu, Xiaobo Liu, Michael B. Rothberg, Anita D. Misra-Hebert
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2021, 19 (3) 258-261; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2647
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Genital Tucking Practices in Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients
  • Update to Gabapentinoid Use in the United States, 2002-2021
  • Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Family Medicine Residency Programs
Show more Research Brief

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
    • Prevention
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
    • Professional practice

Keywords

  • insulin resistance
  • metabolic syndrome
  • prediabetic state
  • shared medical appointments

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine