Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Problems throughout the process of care.
* Typology codes:
Access breakdown, difficulty contacting office, involving telephone system, telephone not answered, and excessive time on hold.
Relationship breakdown, intermediary imposed on communication with clinician; and access breakdown, no return of telephone call.
Relationship breakdown, disrespect or insensitivity, evident in interpersonal communication, rude behavior.
Inefficiency of care, duplicative registration.
Access breakdown, excessive office waiting time.
Relationship breakdown, disrespect or insensitivity, evident in patient flow in the office, prioritizing patients based on race.
Relationship breakdown, inadequate time with provider.
Technical error, deficiency in history, incomplete history of medications.
Relationship breakdown, disrespect or insensitivity, evident in interpersonal communication, patient advice ignored.
Technical error, deficiency in treatment or follow-up, results of investigations not shared with patient.
Relationship breakdown, disrespect or insensitivity, evident in interpersonal communication, patient preferences not respected.
Tables
Number of Unique Reports Unique Events 1st 2nd 3rd Note: taxonomy is ordered from general to specific. Coding actually went to a fourth order of specificity; 3 orders are shown. 1. Access breakdown 63 1.1. Difficulty initiating contact with office by telephone 10 1.2. Excessive delay in obtaining appointment with clinician 10 1.3. Excessive delay in obtaining referral to specialist 1 1.4. Excessive delay in / no return of telephone call 7 1.5. Excessive office waiting time 17 1.6. Service not covered 11 1.6.1. Medications not covered 2 1.6.2. Family member excluded from practice 1 1.6.3. Specialty services limited 8 1.7. Service not available 7 1.7.1. Lack of telephone care 4 1.7.2. Lack of acute care 2 1.7.3. Lack of evaluation before referral 1 2. Communication breakdown 17 2.1. Within office 8 2.1.1. Insurance information not recorded 1 2.1.2. Insurance information not updated 1 2.1.3. Payment not posted 1 2.1.4. Appointment improperly scheduled 3 2.1.5. Wrong chart used for patient 2 2.2. Between office and outside entity other than patient 9 2.2.1. Referrals not done 4 2.2.2. Improper coding of service 1 2.2.3. Medication refill not called to pharmacy 2 2.2.4. Records not transferred to requesting clinician 2 3. Relationship breakdown 82 3.1. Inadequate time with clinician 9 3.2. Intermediary imposed on communication with clinician 6 3.3. Care by other than usual clinician 4 3.4. Disrespect or insensitivity 63 3.4.1. Evident in interpersonal communication 38 3.4.2. Evident in patient flow in office 20 3.4.3. Evident in office environment 5 4. Technical error 54 4.1. Deficiency in history 4 4.1.1. Incomplete history of present illness 2 4.1.2. Incomplete history of medications 1 4.1.3. Incomplete past history 1 4.2. Deficiency in physical examination 1 4.2.1. Incomplete physical examination 1 4.3. Deficiency in investigations 1 4.3.1. Artifact introduced in x-ray 1 4.4. Deficiency in diagnosis 11 4.4.1. Failure to appreciate severity/acuity of problem 1 4.4.2. Wrong diagnosis 4 4.4.3. Dismissing selected symptoms 2 4.4.3. Perceived failure to make any diagnosis 4 4.5. Deficiency in treatment and follow up 35 4.5.1. Poor injection technique 1 4.5.2. Results of investigations not shared with patient 6 4.5.3. Inadequate patient education reprocedure, diagnosis or treatment 18 4.5.4. Premature recommendation for hysterectomy 1 4.5.5. Perceived polypharmacy 1 4.5.6. Wrong medication dose 2 4.5.7. No treatment for pain 2 4.5.8. Inadequate follow up care 4 4.6. Deficiency in business practice 2 4.6.1. Requiring patient to pay before insurance company 1 4.6.2. Balance billing by participating clinician 1 5. Inefficiency of care 5 5.1. Excessive data elements for registration 1 5.2. Duplicative registration 2 5.3. Unnecessary office visit 2 - Table 2.
Preventable Harms (N = 170) Reported by Respondents, by Number of Unique Instances
Harm Number Psychological 119 Anger and related emotions Anger 31 Upset 8 Irritated 4 Frustrated 17 Personal worth Belittled 15 Sense of violation 3 Sense of betrayal 1 Relationship effects Diminished trust in clinician 11 Diminished relationship with clinician 7 Anxiety about health 10 Related to opportunity cost Wasted time 6 Anxiety about other responsibilities 2 Anxiety about bills 2 Forget important issue Other emotions Disappointed 1 Confused 1 Mood swing 1 Physical 39 Pain Not otherwise specified 12 Abdominal pain 2 Low back pain 1 Bruising 4 Related to medication effects Hypoglycemia 2 Somnolence 1 Drug interactions 1 Worsening problem Asthma 3 Hypertension 1 Cellulitis 1 Flank abscess 1 Uterine bleeding 1 Undertreated, untreated conditions Hyperlipidemia 1 Diabetes 1 Sjögren’s syndrome 1 Other Weakness 2 “Sick” 2 Dizziness 1 Fever 1 Economic, other 12 Avoidable personal medical expense 9 Threat to credit rating 1 Lost work time, pay 1 End of sports career 1
Supplemental Appendix
Additional Illustrative Quotes Assembled by Steven H. Woolf, MD, MPH
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Supplemental data: Appendix - PDF file, 8 pages, .23 MB
The Article in Brief
Thirty-eight patients were interviewed about problems they experienced in the primary care office setting. Most of the problems they identified related to difficulties in their relationships with doctors or others in the medical office (for example, many felt that they were treated with disrespect or insensitivity), or problems in getting access to the doctor or the office (such as delays in getting appointments or long waiting times). Patients described more psychological and emotional harms than physical harms.
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Safety-netting strategies for primary and emergency care: a codesign study with patients, carers and clinicians in Sweden
- Primary care teams reported actions to improve medication safety: a qualitative study with insights in high reliability organising
- Explaining the negative effects of patient participation in patient safety: an exploratory qualitative study in an academic tertiary healthcare centre in the Netherlands
- Ambulatory Medication Safety in Primary Care: A Systematic Review
- Nature and type of patient-reported safety incidents in primary care: cross-sectional survey of patients from Australia and England
- Multimorbidity and patient-reported diagnostic errors in the primary care setting: multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan
- Can patients contribute to safer care in meetings with healthcare professionals? A cross-sectional survey of patient perceptions and beliefs
- The Evaluation of Physicians Communication Skills From Multiple Perspectives
- Frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from the patients perspective with clinician review: a population-level survey in Great Britain
- Dynamics of dignity and safety: a discussion
- Development and piloting of a survey to estimate the frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from a UK patients perspective
- Patients evaluations of patient safety in English general practices: a cross-sectional study
- Pilot study on identification of incidents in healthcare transitions and concordance between medical records and patient interview data
- How safe is primary care? A systematic review
- Tip of the iceberg: patient safety incidents in primary care
- Emotional harm from disrespect: the neglected preventable harm
- Patient and carer identified factors which contribute to safety incidents in primary care: a qualitative study
- Relationship continuity: when and why do primary care patients think it is safer?
- MAXimising Involvement in MUltiMorbidity (MAXIMUM) in primary care: protocol for an observation and interview study of patients, GPs and other care providers to identify ways of reducing patient safety failures
- Learning soft skills
- Do older patients' perceptions of safety highlight barriers that could make their care safer during organisational care transfers?
- Safety incidents in family medicine
- Information Chaos in Primary Care: Implications for Physician Performance and Patient Safety
- Speaking up about safety concerns: multi-setting qualitative study of patients' views and experiences
- Patient report on information given, consultation time and safety in primary care
- Safety learning system development--incident reporting component for family practice
- Adverse events in hospitals: the patient's point of view
- The challenge of improving patient safety in primary care
- Patient Error: A Preliminary Taxonomy
- The Medical Home: Growing Evidence to Support a New Approach to Primary Care
- "Every error counts": a web-based incident reporting and learning system for general practice
- Impact of patient communication problems on the risk of preventable adverse events in acute care settings
- Mitigation of patient harm from testing errors in family medicine offices: a report from the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network
- Patient safety events reported in general practice: a taxonomy
- Patients use an internet technology to report when things go wrong
- Rural Community Members' Perceptions of Harm from Medical Mistakes: A High Plains Research Network (HPRN) Study
- Stopping the error cascade: a report on ameliorators from the ASIPS collaborative
- Errors and adverse events in family medicine: Developing and validating a Canadian taxonomy of errors
- How Experiencing Preventable Medical Problems Changed Patients' Interactions With Primary Health Care
- The Break-Even Point: When Medical Advances Are Less Important Than Improving the Fidelity With Which They Are Delivered
- Networks For New Knowledge In Family Medicine
- Questions, Interpretation, Exhortation
- Why Isn't It Better?
- A String of Mistakes: The Importance of Cascade Analysis in Describing, Counting, and Preventing Medical Errors
- In This Issue: Practice Change and Patient Safety