Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleMethodology From PBRNS

Opportunities, Challenges, and Lessons of International Research in Practice-Based Research Networks: The Case of an International Study of Acute Otitis Media

Larry A. Green, George E. Fryer, Paul Froom, Larry Culpepper and Jack Froom
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2004, 2 (5) 429-433; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.224
Larry A. Green
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George E. Fryer Jr
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Froom
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Larry Culpepper
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jack Froom
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Authors Respond to Comments: If There Were Another WONCA Research Conference ...
    Larry A Green
    Published on: 02 November 2004
  • From joint frustrations to shared perspectives: building on the experience of the international otitis media study
    Chris van Weel
    Published on: 29 October 2004
  • Lessons for international collaboration on research
    Jonathan P Graffy
    Published on: 22 October 2004
  • Not for the Faint Hearted.
    Ann C. Macaulay
    Published on: 14 October 2004
  • Published on: (2 November 2004)
    Page navigation anchor for Authors Respond to Comments: If There Were Another WONCA Research Conference ...
    Authors Respond to Comments: If There Were Another WONCA Research Conference ...
    • Larry A Green, Washington, DC

    Professor van Weel ups the ante for family physician researchers, and for good reasons, including the United States' National Institute of Health's "Roadmap" initiative, now seeking to enhance clinical research by establishing research networks in various fields. Standardized ethical review processes for such networks, as mentioned by Dr. van Weel, would be an example of help in reducing barriers to more practice-based res...

    Show More

    Professor van Weel ups the ante for family physician researchers, and for good reasons, including the United States' National Institute of Health's "Roadmap" initiative, now seeking to enhance clinical research by establishing research networks in various fields. Standardized ethical review processes for such networks, as mentioned by Dr. van Weel, would be an example of help in reducing barriers to more practice-based research involving people in different states and countries.

    I remain optimistic that careful observational research in primary care research networks will emerge as a valid source of knowledge, especially about the EFFECTIVENESS (vs mere efficacy)of interventions in primary care. It is conceivable that populations receiving care (not just a sample) can be incorporated into primary care network research. When one knows whether the population cared for was better or worse after intervention A, and the favorable experience is reduced or absent when intervention A is not done, and the favorable experience is replicated in another population exposed to intervention A --what would we clinicians be prepared to conclude? Would we prefer to rely on and wait for an RCT involving a few randomly chosen but selected patients to define evidence- based care for our patients? Is there something beyond the RCT that is needed to complete medical knowledge? Could these questions be part of the agenda for the next WONCA research conference?

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (29 October 2004)
    Page navigation anchor for From joint frustrations to shared perspectives: building on the experience of the international otitis media study
    From joint frustrations to shared perspectives: building on the experience of the international otitis media study
    • Chris van Weel, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Unless primary care will disappear overnight from the international research agenda, the otitis media study [1] will in all likelihood for later generations be looked upon as a landmark event. International variation in primary care performance has been analyzed extensively and in depth before. But here for one of the first times, the international setting of primary care with all its variations, was used to analyze tre...

    Show More

    Unless primary care will disappear overnight from the international research agenda, the otitis media study [1] will in all likelihood for later generations be looked upon as a landmark event. International variation in primary care performance has been analyzed extensively and in depth before. But here for one of the first times, the international setting of primary care with all its variations, was used to analyze treatment and outcome of a common condition in primary care. Due to this international setting it was possible to overcome restricted treatment options imposed by national standard setting.

    Given the fact that the potential of international primary care research is thriving [2] the analysis of the otitis media study experience presents valuable ‘behind-the-scenes’ experience. This is experience the international primary care research community could learn from and build upon and for that reason I would like to pursue the implications of this paper from an international perspective.

    The first point is directed at methodology: it is an interesting model that an international framework presented a natural experiment – through variation of treatment routines for otitis media – that could serve as an alternative for a randomized controlled trial (RCT). This was interesting and welcome in this case, but more methodological evidence is needed on the value of this methodological concept in general terms and to what extent international variation in care can replace RCTs. In fact, the international otitis media study [1] was a parallel series of observational studies, and recently the reliability of observational research has been challenged in an in-depth epidemiological debate on the effectiveness and safety of hormone replacement [3]. The concerns of practitioner-prescriber bias in the light of expected treatment outcomes that were raised in that context [4] should not be discarded lightly, and international meta-analysis of study collaborations might be helpful to explore more in-depth their strengths and weakness.

    Technology and lack of international standardization of practice and research equipment came forward as restrictive factors in the otitis media study. Although family medicine has come a long way in standardizing most of its key terms and information [5, 6], such data have to be collected under prevailing health care conditions and this will inevitably account for international variation. Yet, it might be helpful for primary care, to tap into the experiences in other fields of medicine. Cardiology, with its long reputation of large-scale international studies, would come foreword as an interesting party in an analysis of international research experience and research in that field must have encountered some of the challenges of the otitis media study group. . It is obvious that there are discipline-specific driving factors towards international collaboration in research: in primary care the importance to include the rich variation of practitioners’ performance and (national) practice routines, while in other specialties – see the cardiology mega-trials – it is the need of sufficient numbers.

    The most interesting aspect of the otitis media study, though, is in the different ethical appreciations of treatments. It is logical that family physicians’ preference, in case of otitis media, for antibiotics in the US and UK and for the ‘wait-and-see’ approach in Netherlands is grounded in the ethical valuation of their respective national review panel. But it remains difficult to accept, in ethical terms, that national preferences dictate that antibiotics is what patients will get even when wait-and-see is equally good, or patients are put on a wait-and-see approach when antibiotics have added benefits. In other words, the national (or even regional [1]) borders with their ethical views might impede the effectiveness of medical care. For that reason international research advocacy should challenge this and address considerations of ethical review panels in the light of international primary care. In summary, the international study on otitis media heralds an urgent need for a review of primary care research in an international perspective, including experiences of other medical disciplines and taking into account the broad medical and ethical implications. Would this be the theme of a next [2] Wonca-invitational conference?

    Chris van Weel Professor of family medicine Radboud University Medical Centre

    References 1.Froom J, Culpepper L, Grob P, et al. Diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute otitis media: report from International Primary Care Network. Br Med J 1990; 300: 582-586.

    2.van Weel C, Rosser WW. Improving health care globally: A critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2 (suppl. 2): 5s-16s.

    3.Lowlor DA, Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S. Commentary: the hormone replacement-coronary heart disease conondrum: is this the death of observational epidemiology? Int J Epidemiol 2004; 33: 464-467.

    4.Vandenbroucke J. The HRT story: vindication of old epidemiological theory. Int J Epidemiol 2004; 33: 456-457

    5.Wonca International Classification Committee. Internatioal Classification of Primary Care, ICPC-2 . 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    6.Bentzen N. (ed) Wonca Dictionary of General/Family Practice. Copenhagen: Maanedsskrift for Praktisk Laegegering, 2003. Also: http://www.globalfamilydoctor.com

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (22 October 2004)
    Page navigation anchor for Lessons for international collaboration on research
    Lessons for international collaboration on research
    • Jonathan P Graffy, Cambridge, UK

    Green et al tell a good story but fail to answer a key question, “Was it worth the effort?” in their account of international collaboration on otitis media research. Perhaps the more we put into our research, the harder it is to admit defeat. Was their finding that there was little difference in the time children took to recover from otitis media, regardless of the antibiotic regime used in their country, worth the ef...

    Show More

    Green et al tell a good story but fail to answer a key question, “Was it worth the effort?” in their account of international collaboration on otitis media research. Perhaps the more we put into our research, the harder it is to admit defeat. Was their finding that there was little difference in the time children took to recover from otitis media, regardless of the antibiotic regime used in their country, worth the effort?

    If this was the whole story, one might be tempted to dismiss study as a grand but foolhardy mission. But they report lessons that we can all learn from.

    - Different countries really are different, so collaborative projects need to fit the local context.

    - Although eWorld, their data transmission system let them down, the Internet now offers an economical way to transmit data from collaborative studies.

    - Research often takes longer than we anticipate, and we need to build margins of error into our funding bids.

    - This paper also reminds us that researchers must engage in debates about when the regulation of research only serves to stifle it.

    Despite the difficulties that Green et al encountered, globalisation is making it easier to communicate across national boundaries. Both doctors and patients turn to the Internet for information from around the world. As we communicate more it becomes easier to see the differences between the ways in which we work. Indeed opinion leaders often find ideas from abroad more attractive than locally developed solutions when they face up to long-standing problems in the delivery of health services.

    So there is a strong case for more cross-border research. Hopefully this paper will help those embarking on this avoid some of the pitfalls that Green et al encountered.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (14 October 2004)
    Page navigation anchor for Not for the Faint Hearted.
    Not for the Faint Hearted.
    • Ann C. Macaulay, Montreal, Canada

    Thank you for writing this article outlining how you overcame the complexities of international research involving several countries. All researchers should keep this gem close at hand; however many hurdles have arisen in your current research this article will remind you how much worse it could be!

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 2 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 2 (5)
Vol. 2, Issue 5
1 Sep 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • The Issue in Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Opportunities, Challenges, and Lessons of International Research in Practice-Based Research Networks: The Case of an International Study of Acute Otitis Media
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Opportunities, Challenges, and Lessons of International Research in Practice-Based Research Networks: The Case of an International Study of Acute Otitis Media
Larry A. Green, George E. Fryer, Paul Froom, Larry Culpepper, Jack Froom
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2004, 2 (5) 429-433; DOI: 10.1370/afm.224

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Opportunities, Challenges, and Lessons of International Research in Practice-Based Research Networks: The Case of an International Study of Acute Otitis Media
Larry A. Green, George E. Fryer, Paul Froom, Larry Culpepper, Jack Froom
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2004, 2 (5) 429-433; DOI: 10.1370/afm.224
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • OPPORTUNITY
    • CHALLENGES
    • SOME PRACTICAL LESSONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Acute sore throat
  • Data Collection Outcomes Comparing Paper Forms With PDA Forms in an Office-Based Patient Survey
  • The Creation and Development of the Dental Practice-Based Research Network
  • Electronic Data Collection Options for Practice-Based Research Networks
  • In this Issue: The Patient-Clinician Relationship and Practice-Based Network Research
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • How and Why to Study the Practice Content of a Practice-Based Research Network
  • Rapid Assessment of Agents of Biological Terrorism: Defining the Differential Diagnosis of Inhalational Anthrax Using Electronic Communication in a Practice-Based Research Network
Show more Methodology From PBRNS

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Other research types:
    • PBRN research
  • Other topics:
    • Research capacity building
    • Social / cultural context

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine