Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Improving Test Ordering in Primary Care: The Added Value of a Small-Group Quality Improvement Strategy Compared With Classic Feedback Only

Wim H. J. M. Verstappen, Trudy van der Weijden, Willy I. Dubois, Ivo Smeele, Jan Hermsen, Frans E. S. Tan and Richard P. T. M. Grol
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2004, 2 (6) 569-575; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.244
Wim H. J. M. Verstappen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Trudy van der Weijden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Willy I. Dubois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivo Smeele
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Hermsen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frans E. S. Tan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard P. T. M. Grol
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Structure of the 90-minute small-group quality improvement meeting.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Flow of randomized trial. PCP = primary care physician.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Baseline and follow-up measurements in mean total numbers of tests per 6 months at aggregated local practice group level for the 13 intervention and the 14 feedback local practice groups.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Clinical Problems and Associated Tests Used in the Trial

    Clinical ProblemsTests
    BUN = blood urea nitrogen; ECG = electrocardiogram; ALT = alanine aminotransferase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; LDH = lactic dehydrogenase.
    *Tests that are inappropriate according to national evidence-based guidelines on upper abdominal complaints (see Supplemental Appendix).
    Cardiovascular conditionsCholesterol, subfractions, potassium, sodium, creatinine, BUN, ECG (exercise)
    Lower abdominal complaintsProstate-specific antigen, C-reactive protein, ultrasound scan of the kidney, intravenous pyelogram, double-contrast barium enema, sigmoidoscopy
    Upper abdominal complaintsALT, AST,* LDH*, amylase,* γ-glutamyltrans- ferase, bilirubin,* alkaline phosphatase,* ultrasound scan of hepatobiliary tract
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Study Population Characteristics at Individual Primary Care Physician Level

    CharacteristicIntervention ArmFeedback Arm
    * Total practice population for whom the primary care physician is responsible. † Working time factor, full time = 100% = 5 days; each half-day = 10%, so a physician with a part-time factor of 70% works 7 half-day periods.
    Number of physicians85109
    Age, mean (SD), y46.2 (6.6)46.2 (6.6)
    Female, No. (%)14 (16)11 (10)
    Patients per physician, mean No. (SD)*2,587 (641)2,444 (416)
    Patients >65 y, mean % (SD)15 (6.8)15 (6.5)
    Working time factor, % (SD)†91 (15)92 (12)
    Physicians with a solo practice, No. (%)43 (51)44 (40)
    Physicians who use computerized registration system, No. (%)66 (78)75 (69)
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Effects of Strategy on the Mean (SD) Number of Tests and the Coefficient of Variance, per Primary Care Physician and per 6 Months

    Intervention ArmFeedback Arm
    Study SubjectsBaseline Mean (SD)CV*Follow-up Mean (SD)CV*Baseline Mean (SD)CV*Follow-up Mean (SD)CV*β†SE β95% CI P
    Note: analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline number of tests and the regions.
    CV = coefficient of variance; CI = confidence interval.
    * CV = SD / mean.
    † β = intervention effect = the total change between baseline and follow-up of mean numbers of tests in Intervention arm less the total change of numbers between baseline and follow-up of mean numbers of tests in the feedback arm.
    Total number of tests478 (309)0.65422 (235)0.56541 (337)0.62535 (309)0.58−5117.94−87 to −16.005
    Cardiovascular conditions293 (189)0.65276 (157)0.57322 (214)0.66333 (205)0.62−2513.08−51 to 1.056
    Lower abdominal complaints20 (20)1.0018 (19)1.0630 (40)1.4330 (27)0.90−62.18−10 to −2.008
    Upper abdominal complaints165 (125)0.76128 (82)0.64188 (143)0.76171(117)0.68−247.98−40 to −8.003
    Inappropriate upper abdominal tests55 (60)1.0939 (32)0.8260 (63)1.0556 (54)0.96−134.1−22 to −5.2.002

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Appendix and Figure

    Supplemental Appendix. Upper Abdominal Complaints; Supplemental figure. An Example of a Feedback Report.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental data: Appendix - PDF file, 1 page, 46 KB
    • Supplemental data: Figure - PDF file, 1 page, 41 KB
  • The Article in Brief

    Physicians who participate in specially designed meetings with their peers order fewer diagnostic tests than physicians who receive only written reports about test ordering. The small-group meetings were held among primary care physicians in the Netherlands to discuss tests they ordered for patients with cardiovascular conditions (such as high cholesterol levels) and upper and lower abdominal complaints, and to review national guidelines on those topics. Meeting participants ordered fewer tests than physicians who received only written feedback about their test-ordering behavior. This strategy may be an effective way to reduce unnecessary test ordering and is being implemented throughout the Netherlands.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 2 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 2 (6)
Vol. 2, Issue 6
1 Nov 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • [In Brief]
  • [Annual Indexes, 2004]
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improving Test Ordering in Primary Care: The Added Value of a Small-Group Quality Improvement Strategy Compared With Classic Feedback Only
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 16 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Improving Test Ordering in Primary Care: The Added Value of a Small-Group Quality Improvement Strategy Compared With Classic Feedback Only
Wim H. J. M. Verstappen, Trudy van der Weijden, Willy I. Dubois, Ivo Smeele, Jan Hermsen, Frans E. S. Tan, Richard P. T. M. Grol
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2004, 2 (6) 569-575; DOI: 10.1370/afm.244

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Improving Test Ordering in Primary Care: The Added Value of a Small-Group Quality Improvement Strategy Compared With Classic Feedback Only
Wim H. J. M. Verstappen, Trudy van der Weijden, Willy I. Dubois, Ivo Smeele, Jan Hermsen, Frans E. S. Tan, Richard P. T. M. Grol
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2004, 2 (6) 569-575; DOI: 10.1370/afm.244
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Strategies to reduce the use of low-value medical tests in primary care: a systematic review
  • What motivates general practitioners to change practice behaviour? A qualitative study of audit and feedback group sessions in Dutch general practice
  • Quality circles for quality improvement in primary health care: their effectiveness, gaps of knowledge, origins and significance - a scoping review
  • Explaining variations in test ordering in primary care: protocol for a realist review
  • Temporal growth and geographic variation in the use of laboratory tests by NHS general practices: using routine data to identify research priorities
  • Canadian Quality Circle pilot project in osteoporosis: Rationale, methods, and feasibility
  • Effectiveness of a Practice-Based, Multimodal Quality Improvement Intervention for Gastroenteritis Within a Medicaid Managed Care Network
  • "Our community of reflective practitioners will continue its quest informed...."
  • In This Issue: New Model Finances, Systematic Reviews, Patients and Health Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Building a Data Bridge: Policies, Structures, and Governance Integrating Primary Care Into the Public Health Response to COVID-19
  • Adaptation and External Validation of Pathogenic Urine Culture Prediction in Primary Care Using Machine Learning
  • Primary Care Physicians’ and Patients’ Perspectives on Equity and Health Security of Infectious Disease Digital Surveillance
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Professional practice
  • Other topics:
    • Quality improvement

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine