Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial of 2 Federally Recommended Strategies to Reduce Excess Body Fat in Overweight, Low-Income Patients: MyPlate.gov vs Calorie Counting

William J. McCarthy, Melvin Rico, Maria Chandler, Dena R. Herman, Cindy Chang, Thomas R. Belin, Stephanie Love, Evangelina Ramirez and Lillian Gelberg
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2023, 21 (3) 213-219; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2964
William J. McCarthy
1Center for Cancer Prevention & Control Research, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
2Department of Psychology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: wmccarth@ucla.edu
Melvin Rico
3Charles R. Drew University Postgraduate Medical School, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Chandler
4The Children’s Clinic of Long Beach, Long Beach, California
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dena R. Herman
5College of Health and Human Development, California State University-Northridge, Northridge, California
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cindy Chang
1Center for Cancer Prevention & Control Research, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas R. Belin
6Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie Love
4The Children’s Clinic of Long Beach, Long Beach, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evangelina Ramirez
7Kalula Transport, Hemet, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lillian Gelberg
8Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
9Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    CONSORT flow diagram showing reasons for study attrition.

    CONSORT = Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Baseline Marginal Means for Primary Outcome Measures, by Condition, Among 261 Adult Low-Income Primary Care Patients of a Partnering Federally Qualified Health Center

    Outcome MeasureMyPlateCalorie CountingGroup Difference P Value
    Baseline Mean (SE)Baseline Mean (SE)
    Hunger, mm  47.09 (2.16)  50.75 (2.17).30
    Meal satisfaction, mm  66.91 (2.54)  69.31 (2.55).54
    Feeling full, mm  65.96 (2.31)  69.89 (2.32).26
    Waist circumference, cm100.47 (0.81)103.30 (0.81)  .054
    Body weight, kg  80.85 (0.99)  83.03 (1.00).31
    • DASH = Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension.

    • Note: Mean values reflect statistical adjustments for participant age, sex, marital status, educational attainment, race/ethnicity, and DASH score.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Marginal Mean Differences From Baseline to 6 and 12 Months Follow-Up for Primary Outcome Measures, by Condition, Among 261 Adult Low-Income Primary Care Patients of a Partnering Federally Qualified Health Center

    MeasureMyPlateCalorie CountingGroup
    Differenceb
    Group
    Difference
    P Value
    6 Months
    (95% CI)
    12 Months
    (95% CI)
    12-Months
    Difference
    P Value
    6 Months
    (95% CI)
    12 Months
    (95% CI)
    12-Month
    Difference
    P Value
    Hunger, mm−3.76 (−9.41 to 1.89)−6.17 (−11.85 to −0.50)a  .03a−8.29 (−14.22 to −2.36)a−9.64 (−15.41 to −3.87)a  .001a−3.47  .51
    Meal satisfaction, mm12.05 (5.01 to 19.09)a17.13 (10.07 to 24.20)a<.001a9.46 (2.09 to 16.83)a12.80 (5.62 to 20.0)a<.001a  2.59  .69
    Feeling full after meal, mm5.81 (−0.68 to 12.30)12.64 (6.12 to 19.15)a  .001a4.89 (−1.90 to 11.68)8.13 (1.51 to 14.75)a  .016a  4.51  .61
    Waist circumference, cmc−1.42 (−2.75 to −0.08)a−1.86 (−3.26 to −0.46)a  .009a−0.39 (−1.82 to 1.04)−1.71 (−3.16 to −0.26)a  .02a−0.15  .54
    Waist circumference, cmd−2.18 (−3.50 to −0.85)a−3.15 (−4.54 to −1.77)a<.001a−0.94 (−2.36 to 0.47)−2.72 (−4.16 to −1.29)a  .0002a−0.43  .45
    Body weight, kg−0.23 (−1.11 to 0.66)−0.34 (−1.27 to 0.59)  .48−0.55 (−1.50 to 0.41)−0.75 (−1.72 to 0.23)  .13  0.41  .81
    • Note: Mean values reflect statistical adjustments for participant age, sex, marital status, educational attainment, and race/ethnicity. Changes in outcomes observed for participants who participated in 7-11 sessions were greater than changes observed for participants who participated in ≤6 sessions.

    • ↵a Significant change from baseline at the P < .025 for body composition measures (Bonferroni-corrected nominal P value) and at the q =.05 (false-discovery rate) correction for multiplicity of hypothesis testing for the 3 satiety measures.

    • ↵b Group-by-time interaction (group difference in differences from baseline to 12 months follow-up).

    • ↵c Waist circumference not corrected for variation in measurement over clothing.

    • ↵d Waist circumference corrected for variation in measurement over clothing.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS IN PDF FILE BELOW

    • McCarthy_Supp_Tables_1-5.pdf -

      PDF file

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (3)
Vol. 21, Issue 3
May/June 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain-Language Summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial of 2 Federally Recommended Strategies to Reduce Excess Body Fat in Overweight, Low-Income Patients: MyPlate.gov vs Calorie Counting
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial of 2 Federally Recommended Strategies to Reduce Excess Body Fat in Overweight, Low-Income Patients: MyPlate.gov vs Calorie Counting
William J. McCarthy, Melvin Rico, Maria Chandler, Dena R. Herman, Cindy Chang, Thomas R. Belin, Stephanie Love, Evangelina Ramirez, Lillian Gelberg
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2023, 21 (3) 213-219; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2964

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial of 2 Federally Recommended Strategies to Reduce Excess Body Fat in Overweight, Low-Income Patients: MyPlate.gov vs Calorie Counting
William J. McCarthy, Melvin Rico, Maria Chandler, Dena R. Herman, Cindy Chang, Thomas R. Belin, Stephanie Love, Evangelina Ramirez, Lillian Gelberg
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2023, 21 (3) 213-219; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2964
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • New Insights and Future Directions: The Importance of Considering Poverty in Studies of Obesity and Diabetes
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
  • Feasibility and Acceptability of the “About Me” Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
    • Prevention
  • Person groups:
    • Women's health
  • Methods:
    • Mixed methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
  • Other topics:
    • Social / cultural context

Keywords

  • clinical trial
  • obesity treatment
  • nutrition intervention
  • Latiné
  • immigrant

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine