Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Declining Participation in Primary Care Quality Improvement Research: A Qualitative Study

Megan McHugh, Jennifer Heinrich, Sarah Philbin, Dawn Bishop, Justin D. Smith, Jacqueline M. Knapke, Anya Day and Theresa L. Walunas
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2023, 21 (5) 388-394; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3007
Megan McHugh
1Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Megan-mchugh@northwestern.edu
Jennifer Heinrich
2Center for Health Information Partnerships, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Philbin
3Center for Education in Health Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dawn Bishop
4Altarum, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin D. Smith
5Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacqueline M. Knapke
6University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anya Day
4Altarum, Ann Arbor, Michigan
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theresa L. Walunas
2Center for Health Information Partnerships, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Summary of QI Project Characteristics

    CharacteristicQI Projects Focused on Unhealthy Alcohol UseQI Projects Focused on Heart Health
    INSPIRE ProjectMI-SPARC ProjectHH4M ProjectHHOI Project
    Targeted statesWisconsin, IllinoisMichigan, IndianaMichiganOhio
    Recruitment periodFebruary 2020-March 2020; September 2020-April 2022February 2021-September 2022October 2021-August 2022April 2021-May 2022
    Approximate time commitment for practices1 hour per week over 6 months2-hour initial training; 1-2 hours per month over 6 months1-2 hours per month over 12 months4-hour initial training; quarterly 1-hour webinars; 1 hour per month over 12 months
    Compensation per practice, $None≤2,5001,0004,000
    • HH4M = Healthy Hearts for Michigan; HHOI = Heart Healthy Ohio Initiative; INSPIRE = Intervention in Small Primary Care Practices to Implement Reduction in Unhealthy Alcohol Use; MI-SPARC = Michigan Sustained Patient-Centered Alcohol-Related Care; QI = quality improvement.

    • Note: Enrollment rates ranged from approximately 2% to 6% across the 4 projects. Precise rates are unknown because some recruiters used listservs (eg, local medical societies) and the number of practices reached through those channels was estimated. Further, the number of ineligible practices among nonrespondents was unknown.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Data Collection From Practices, by QI Project and Overall

    PracticesQI Projects Focused on Unhealthy Alcohol UseQI Projects Focused on Heart HealthTotal
    INSPIRE ProjectMI-SPARC ProjectHH4M ProjectHHOI Project
    Contacted, No.24353911109
    Responded, No. (%)a  9 (37.4)  7 (20.0)  8 (20.5)  7 (63.6)  31 (28.4)
    Completed interview, No.  3  3  3  7  16
    Completed questionnaire, No.  2  1  0  0    3
    Sent e-mail response, No.  4  3  5  0  12
    • HH4M = Healthy Hearts for Michigan; HHOI = Heart Healthy Ohio Initiative; INSPIRE = Intervention in Small Primary Care Practices to Implement Reduction in Unhealthy Alcohol Use; MI-SPARC = Michigan Sustained Patient-Centered Alcohol-Related Care; QI = quality improvement.

    • ↵a The percentage is the participation rate for this follow-up study.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Key Themes and Representative Quotes on Reasons for Declining Participation in an Evidence-Based QI Project

    ThemeRepresentative Quotes
    Staffing shortages; difficulty just maintaining usual operations (primary theme)“Our staff is not the same either, they’re not the same performers that they were pre-COVID. We’re all seeing that, as I talked to my colleagues around the country.”
    “We are definitely short staffed, and if it required any amount of doing extra, that would have been put on my plate, and I have no extra to give.”
    “It’s been increasingly difficult to keep staff, everybody seems to be short staffed. We can’t seem to find enough people to work and people that are reliable.”
    “COVID has really put a lot of challenges on our health centers from a staffing perspective…no one’s back to where they need to be to pay the bills. I sit in lots of venues where that’s the conversation, and to be able to give people the time they need for these types of initiatives, to do it well and to embrace what is intended, is what we’re all struggling with.”
    Clinicians’ and staff’s lack of time to engage in additional activities (primary theme)“I already take home too much work, which ends up getting done late at night or early in the morning. There are many days when I feel like I’m barely keeping my head above water. This wouldn’t have been a healthy addition.”
    Concern that QI project’s time requirement, although reasonable, would be more than stated (primary theme)“The 1 hour a month or 1 hour a quarter is not that much. It’s not too much. It’s everything in between. Right? It’s the, ‘We’re making a plan, now we want to implement it, now we need to talk about how to do that. Bring in staff. We need to follow up on the action plan and track everything and do the PDSAs.’ That’s where the time commitment is.”
    Confidence in practice’s current ability to care for patient group targeted by QI project (secondary theme)“[The QI project] mirrored the processes that we already have in place, so we were already screening for substance use and utilizing the SBIRT process at our medical sites. It felt like it was an additional screening we were already doing and an additional process that we kind of felt like we were already doing on top of the fact that we are kind of underwater with too much stuff to do.”
    Ongoing changes to EHR; concern that EHR lacked capability to extract necessary performance data (secondary theme)“Our biggest barrier at the time was our transition from one electronic medical record to another. And at that time, we weren’t sure how to pull data from that new system. We didn’t know what access we would have to the data or how we could customize reporting or anything.”
    “We didn’t have the capacity to pull the data in the way they wanted it to be. So we have a lot of pretty sophisticated data functionality. But it was still not what we had the ability to do without going back to our Epic team, and our Epic team is not super keen on building reports, and so that was something that we decided was not going to be beneficial for us.”
    Expectation of compensation for participation in QI projects that take time away from direct patient care (secondary theme)“Right in the middle of all this, I lost my key person that helps manage this data and submit a lot of those data for the programs. Truthfully, my bandwidth was strapped and I think there was $4,000 incentive to get us to do this. It would cost me more than that to do it.”
    • EHR = electronic health record; PDSA = plan-do-study-act; QI = quality improvement; SBIRT = screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Key Themes and Representative Quotes on Recommendations for Improving the Feasibility or Attractiveness of QI Projects

    ThemeRepresentative Quotes
    External QI projects are not well situated to address the staffing and time deficiencies within primary care practices (primary theme)“It’s not fair for you to think there’s something that you could have done differently.”
    “There is not anything that could have changed regarding the program that would have allowed us to participate with the already maxed resources, as serving patients and their needs is our top priority.”
    There are strategies that QI project planners can use to facilitate the recruitment of primary care practices (secondary theme)“Helping them build the team to do this work. Not counting on the primary care provider being the driver of this bus but wrapping that provider with—is it a care manager, is it a social worker, is it some other care team participant—who can take on some of this work?”
    “Maybe tailoring the programs based on regionality or rurality of the organization…having the ability to send people out, coming face to face and actually participating in those meetings and maybe leading some of these meetings that will be meaningful rather than a WebEx.”
    “I used to get 15-20 e-mails a day and now get 50 or more a day. But I just delete most of my e-mails. Bang, bang, bang, bang. Maybe sending a formal letter of some kind would get my attention better.”
    “It’s always good to hear or talk to someone who’s [already] gone through it.”
    Compensation may facilitate enrollment in QI projects for some practices; however, for most practices, it would not have made a difference (secondary theme)“I don’t know if I can give you a number right now, but it would really have to be enough to compensate for the amount of time that I was going to put into it as well as our clinical staff and our data team.”
    “I don’t know. For us, I don’t think [compensation] would have made any difference at all. That’s not why we were really interested in doing it.”
    • QI = quality improvement.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS IN PDF FILE BELOW

    • McHugh_Supp_App.pdf -

      PDF file

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (5)
Vol. 21, Issue 5
September/October 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain-Language Summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Declining Participation in Primary Care Quality Improvement Research: A Qualitative Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Declining Participation in Primary Care Quality Improvement Research: A Qualitative Study
Megan McHugh, Jennifer Heinrich, Sarah Philbin, Dawn Bishop, Justin D. Smith, Jacqueline M. Knapke, Anya Day, Theresa L. Walunas
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2023, 21 (5) 388-394; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3007

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Declining Participation in Primary Care Quality Improvement Research: A Qualitative Study
Megan McHugh, Jennifer Heinrich, Sarah Philbin, Dawn Bishop, Justin D. Smith, Jacqueline M. Knapke, Anya Day, Theresa L. Walunas
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2023, 21 (5) 388-394; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3007
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family-Based Interventions to Promote Weight Management in Adults: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India
  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Qualitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • PBRN research
  • Other topics:
    • Quality improvement
    • Research capacity building

Keywords

  • primary care
  • quality improvement
  • qualitative methods: key informant/in-depth interviewing
  • health workforce
  • recruitment
  • nonrespondents
  • staffing
  • time
  • incentives
  • practice-based research
  • organizational change

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine