Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Patient and Clinician Sociodemographics and Sexual History Screening at a Multisite Federally Qualified Health Center: A Mixed Methods Study

Kelly W. Gagnon, Robert W. S. Coulter, James E. Egan, Ken Ho and Mary Hawk
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2023, 21 (5) 395-402; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3012
Kelly W. Gagnon
1Division of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kgagnon@uabmc.edu
Robert W. S. Coulter
2Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James E. Egan
2Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Ho
3Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Hawk
2Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
DrPH, LSW
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Sociodemographics of Patients (N = 53,246)

    SociodemographicTotala
    (N = 53,246)
    Documentation of Sexual History Screeningb
    Any
    (n = 22,581)
    None
    (n = 30,665)
    P Value
    Age, mean (SD), y        43.1 (15.7)          42.3 (15.6)          43.8 (15.7)<.05
    Race/ethnicity, No. (%)<.001
        White non-Hispanic14,580 (30.3)  5,930 (40.7)  8,650 (59.3)
        Hispanic25,371 (52.8)10,790 (42.5)14,581 (57.5)
        Black non-Hispanic5,607 (11.7)  2,465 (44.0)  3,142 (56.0)
        Asian non-Hispanic1,556 (3.2)     622 (40.0)     934 (60.0)
        Other non-Hispanic945 (2.0)     404 (42.8)     541 (57.3)
    Sexual orientation, No. (%)<.001
        Heterosexual47,243 (95.2)20,722 (43.9)26,521 (56.1)
        Gay and lesbian1,107 (2.2)     555 (50.1)     552 (49.9)
        Bisexual1,029 (2.1)     506 (49.2)     523 (50.8)
        Other230 (0.5)     110 (47.8)     120 (52.2)
    Gender, No. (%)<.001
        Cisgender woman29,059 (58.1)13,236 (45.6)15,823 (54.5)
        Cisgender man20,517 (41.0)  8,641 (42.1)11,876 (57.9)
        Transgender woman227 (0.5)     100 (42.3)     127 (57.7)
        Transgender man220 (0.4)       93 (44.1)     127 (56.0)
    Primary language, No. (%)<.01
        English37,455 (70.3)16,053 (42.9)21,402 (57.1)
        Other15,761 (29.7)  6,528 (41.3)  9,263 (58.7)
    Insurance status, No. (%)
        Uninsured6,692 (12.6)  2,809 (42.0)  3,883 (58.0)
        Medicare4,929 (9.3)  2,129 (43.2)  2,800 (56.8)
        Medicaid31,389 (59.1)13,355 (42.6)18,034 (57.5)
        Private insurance8,865 (16.7)  3,733 (42.1)  5,132 (57.9)
        Other public insurance1,277 (2.4)     513 (42.6)     764 (57.5)
    Medical site, No. (%)<.001
        Site 19,241 (17.4)  2,837 (30.7)  6,404 (69.3)
        Site 28,578 (16.1)  2,571 (30.0)  6,007 (70.0)
        Site 37,446 (14.0)  4,679 (62.8)  2,767 (37.2)
        Site 47,288 (13.7)  2,511 (34.5)  4,777 (65.6)
        Site 53,937 (7.4)  1,681 (42.7)  2,256 (57.3)
        Site 62,939 (5.5)  1,049 (35.7)  1,890 (64.3)
        Site 72,596 (4.9)  1,347 (51.9)  1,249 (48.1)
        Site 82,282 (4.3)  1,207 (52.9)  1,075 (47.1)
        Site 92,146 (4.0)  1,558 (72.6)     588 (27.4)
        Site 102,065 (3.9)  1,510 (72.1)     555 (26.9)
        Site 111,971 (3.7)     609 (30.9)  1,362 (69.1)
        Site 121,602 (3.0)     421 (26.3)  1,181 (73.7)
        Site 131,155 (2.2)     601 (51.9)     554 (48.1)
    • ↵a Percentages total down the column to show the distribution of all patients by sociodemographics.

    • ↵b Percentages total across rows to show the distribution of patients having a given sociodemographic between the sexual history documentation groups.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Sociodemographics of Primary Care Clinicians (N = 56)

    SociodemographicTotal
    (N = 56)
    Age, mean (SD), y      43.5 (12.1)
    Race and ethnicity, No. (%)
        White non-Hispanic    39 (69.6)
        Hispanic    4 (7.1)
        Black non-Hispanic    4 (7.1)
        Asian non-Hispanic    0 (0.0)
        Other non-Hispanic     9 (16.1)
    Sexual orientation, No. (%)
        Heterosexual    54 (94.7)
        Gay and lesbian    1 (1.8)
        Bisexual    0 (0.0)
        Other    1 (1.8)
    Gender identity, No. (%)
        Cisgender woman 39 (68.4)
        Cisgender man    17 (29.8)
        Transgender woman    0 (0.0)
        Transgender man    0 (0.0)
    Years of employment, mean (SD)7.1 (8.4)
    Clinical credential, No. (%)
        Advanced practice registered nurse    35 (61.4)
        Medical doctor    17 (29.8)
        Physician assistant    3 (5.3)
        Doctor of osteopathic medicine    2 (3.5)
    Patient panel size, mean (SD)1,308 (751)
    Years since training landmarks, mean (SD)
        Credentialing degree      12.3 (11.5)
        Postgraduate training      10.4 (12.7)
        Any additional training      15.4 (16.9)
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Association of Patient and Clinician Sociodemographics With the Odds of Sexual History Screening

    Sociodemographic   ORa (95% CI)P Value
    Patients
    Intercept0.52 (0.33-0.82)…
    Age, per year0.99 (0.99-0.99)<.001
    Race/ethnicity
        White non-Hispanic1.00 (referent)…
        Hispanic1.02 (0.95-1.01).52
        Black non-Hispanic1.01 (0.92-1.01).87
        Asian non-Hispanic0.88 (0.76-1.01).07
        Other non-Hispanic1.05 (0.57-1.33).52
    Sexual orientation
        Heterosexual1.00 (referent)…
        Gay or lesbian1.23 (1.04-1.47).02
        Bisexual1.12 (0.94-1.34).22
        Other0.87 (0.57-1.33).52
    Gender
        Cisgender man1.00 (referent)…
        Cisgender woman1.10 (1.04-1.16)<.001
        Transgender man1.07 (0.72-1.60).74
        Transgender woman1.26 (0.86-1.84).23
    Primary language
        English1.00 (referent)…
        Other0.91 (0.85-0.97).006
    Insurance status
        Private insurance1.00 (referent)…
        Uninsured0.95 (0.86-1.05).33
        Medicare1.07 (0.97-1.19).17
        Medicaid1.00 (0.93-1.08).91
        Other public0.9 (0.75-1.07).22
    Clinicians
    Age, per year1.01 (0.98-1.04).60
    Race/ethnicity
        White non-Hispanic1.00 (referent)…
        Black non-Hispanic0.86 (0.37-1.99).72
        Hispanic1.30 (0.51-3.29).58
        Other non-Hispanic0.92 (0.41-1.67).59
    Sexual orientation
        Heterosexual1.00 (referent)…
        Gay or pansexual1.26 (0.07-23.3).88
    Gender identity
        Cisgender man1.00 (referent)…
        Cisgender woman1.80 (1.00-3.21).048
    Years of employment0.98 (0.95-1.02).37
    Clinical credentials
        Advanced practice registered nurse1.00 (referent)…
        Medical doctor0.99 (0.49-2.01).99
        Physician assistant1.07 (0.22-5.22).93
        Doctor of osteopathic medicine1.15 (0.31-4.21).83
    Patient panel size, per patient0.99 (0.99-0.99).02
    • OR = odds ratio.

    • Note: Bold indicates a statistically significant association (P <.05).

    • ↵a Estimated using multilevel crossed random effects logistic regression analysis, with adjustment for patients’ age, race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, primary language, insurance status, and patients’ primary care clinicians’ age, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, years of employment, and clinical credentials while clustering by primary care clinician and medical site.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Sociodemographics of Key Staff Participating in Interviews (N = 21)

    SociodemographicStaff, No. (%)
    (N = 21)
    Primary care clinician16 (76.2)
    Degree
        Advanced practice registered nurse11 (68.8)
        Medical doctor  3 (18.8)
        Doctor of osteopathic medicine  2 (12.5)
        Physician assistant1 (6.3)
        Medical assistant  3 (14.3)
        Clinical leader2 (9.5)
    Gender
        Cisgender woman14 (66.7)
        Cisgender man  7 (33.3)
        Transgender woman0 (0.0)
        Transgender man0 (0.0)
    Sexual orientation
        Heterosexual19 (90.5)
        Gay or lesbian1 (4.8)
        Bisexual0 (0.0)
        Other1 (4.8)
    Race/ethnicity
        White non-Hispanic11 (52.4)
        Hispanic  3 (14.3)
        Black non-Hispanic2 (9.5)
        Asian non-Hispanic2 (9.5)
        Other non-Hispanic  3 (14.3)
    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Summary of Qualitative Results and Key Quotes

    ThemeSummaryQuote
    Patient genderClinicians perceived discomfort from patients when they were not of the same gender.“I’m a woman and the other person is a guy, and then I have to ask a different sexual history, yeah, some young men, they’re a little embarrassed. And some of my older patient are in [their] 50s, when they want to talk about sexual history, they will ask for a male provider even though I’m their primary care physician. So that would be the hard part. But otherwise, that’s patient preference, so that’s fine.” – DO
    Older ageClinicians stated they ask older patients sexual history questions less frequently compared with other patients, often stemming from the assumption that older patients are not having sex or are not at risk of negative sexual health outcomes.“If I’m going to be honest, if it’s an older patient–when I say older, let’s see, like over 50, and if it’s someone I know, pretty stable, straightforward, I really know the person, I’m not going to engage in sexual history with that person unless something comes up or that patient brings it up because you do have some of those patients who are celibate for periods of time. We’re talking about having a new partner, then out of the blue, they come in to see me for routine blood pressure follow-up. ‘Oh, by the way, I have a new partner,’ and then I’ll broach that subject about testing and contraception. That type of thing. If it’s a younger patient, I deliberately will broach the sex history.” – MD
    Relationship statusSexual history screening was less of a priority during visits for patients in long-term relationships, with clinicians assuming they are not at risk or do not have any concerns.“It’s sometimes harder to remember to do it in patients who have long-term partners that I know of. It’s not ideal to assume that they’re monogamous and have no other relationships, but it sometimes kind of falls off the radar if you take care of like a couple who have been together for 10 years.” – APRN
    Culture and religionClinicians held beliefs about patients’ cultures and religions that they perceived to be very conservative, that made it more difficult or prevented them from asking their patients sexual history questions.“Certainly, culture comes into it. I would be very reluctant to ask certain women about sex because I know they’re having sex with their husbands and they’re not going out. Most Pakistani women, Indian women in their 40s, 50s, 60s, […] so I think culture. Now, younger ones, I would, but certainly somebody who immigrated as an adult and is living still a fairly traditional life, it’s less likely.” – APRN
    “I would say a lot of the, I want to say Pakistani, the Muslim faith women that only come in, they will not come into the room without their spouse in there, that can make it difficult.” – APRN
    Adolescent ageClinicians prioritized sexual history screening with adolescent and young adult patients but had to consider parents.“They may have come in with the parents. I mean, I’m not going to ask them about sexual history in front of the parents, but even with the parents outside, sometimes I think they’re a little bit hesitant because what I find is they’re concerned that it may get back to the parents.” – MD
    Sexual and gender minoritiesClinicians noted the importance of sexual history screening for sexual and gender minority patients, with the recognition that this may be difficult for the patient.“If they come in and it’s fairly obvious they’ve made it known in their chart [that] they identify as transgender [sic] or a man who has sex with men, they might feel uncomfortable because their provider might ask them about sex at every visit. And that’s not fair either. Right? I don’t come in just because I’m a man who has sex with men. I might have diabetes; I might have hypertension. So, I think it’s sort of like that. There’s sort of the two extremes, and then there’s a lot in the middle.” – Clinical leader
    Clinician genderClinicians who identified as women more often described using soft skills to navigate hesitation or discomfort from patients during sexual history screening, whereas men described accepting patients’ initial reaction.“I think also for [the patients], it’s a little bit awkward for them to bring it up and I think it’s a little bit easier if I am the one who initiates it. And if they’re okay talking about it, fine, we talk about it, but then there’s some who are a little bit hesitant about it. So I’ll just kind of read into the patient and I go from there.[…] depending on how the conversation is going, then I’ll probe a little bit more.[…] I just try to tell them up front whatever we discuss is between us.” – MD, woman
    “If they don’t want it, they say, ‘No. Don’t want it,’ and if they do they say, ‘Yeah,’ and then we go ahead and do it. There are some patients that get a little bit kind of like, ‘Why are you asking that? We don’t need to talk about that.’” – APRN, man
    • APRN = advanced practice registered nurse; DO = doctor of osteopathic medicine; MD = medical doctor.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS IN PDF FILE BELOW

    • Gagnon_Supp_Table_App.pdf -

      PDF file

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (5)
Vol. 21, Issue 5
September/October 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain-Language Summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patient and Clinician Sociodemographics and Sexual History Screening at a Multisite Federally Qualified Health Center: A Mixed Methods Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Patient and Clinician Sociodemographics and Sexual History Screening at a Multisite Federally Qualified Health Center: A Mixed Methods Study
Kelly W. Gagnon, Robert W. S. Coulter, James E. Egan, Ken Ho, Mary Hawk
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2023, 21 (5) 395-402; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3012

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Patient and Clinician Sociodemographics and Sexual History Screening at a Multisite Federally Qualified Health Center: A Mixed Methods Study
Kelly W. Gagnon, Robert W. S. Coulter, James E. Egan, Ken Ho, Mary Hawk
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2023, 21 (5) 395-402; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3012
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Neighborhood Determinants of Primary Care Access in Virginia
  • Proactive Deprescribing Among Older Adults With Polypharmacy: Barriers and Enablers
  • Artificial Intelligence Tools for Preconception Cardiomyopathy Screening Among Women of Reproductive Age
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Mixed methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Comprehensiveness
    • Relationship
  • Other topics:
    • Social / cultural context

Keywords

  • primary care
  • sexual health
  • sexually transmitted infections
  • medical history taking
  • preventive care
  • preventive health services
  • screening
  • physician-patient relations
  • ethnic and racial minorities
  • vulnerable populations
  • medically underserved area
  • health care disparities
  • semistructured interview
  • mixed methods
  • health services research

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine