Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Seven Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care Electronic Visits: Qualitative Study of Staff and Patient Views

Susan Moschogianis, Sarah Darley, Tessa Coulson, Niels Peek, Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi and Benjamin C. Brown
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2025, 23 (3) 214-222; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.240292
Susan Moschogianis
1School of Health Sciences, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Darley
1School of Health Sciences, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tessa Coulson
2National Health Service Salford Clinical Commissioning Group, Salford, United Kingdom
MBChB, MRes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Niels Peek
3The Healthcare Improvement Institute (THIS), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi
1School of Health Sciences, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
4National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin C. Brown
1School of Health Sciences, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
5Patchs Health, London, United Kingdom
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: benjamin.brown@manchester.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Newly Identified Opportunities for Use of Artificial Intelligence

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Staff Characteristics

    CharacteristicInterviewees (n = 16)
    Age, y
        Mean (SD)51.9 (15.2)
    Sex, male/female, No. (%)8 (50)/8 (50)
    Role, No. (%)
        GP partner5 (31)
        GP registrar4 (25)
        Receptionist/administrator6 (38)
        Advanced nurse practitioner1 (6)
    Length of time in present GP practice, y
        Median, n (IQR)2 (5-1)
    Length of time using eVisit system, mo
        Median, n (IQR)3 (6-2)
    • GP = general practitioner; IQR = interquartile range

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Patient Characteristics

    CharacteristicInterviewees (n = 24)
    Age, y
      Mean (SD)51.9 (15.2)
    Sex, male/female, No. (%)12 (50)/12 (50)
    Ethnicity, No. (%)
      Asian2 (8)
      White British20 (83)
      White European1 (4)
      White (other)1 (4)
    Occupation, No. (%)
      Employed15 (63)
      Unemployed2 (8)
      Retired5 (21)
      Student1 (4)
      Unknown1 (4)
    Number of times used eVisit
      Median, n (IQR)5 (7-2)
    • IQR = interquartile range.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS IN PDF FILE BELOW

    • Moschogianis_Supp_Apps1-3.pdf -

      PDF FILE

  • VISUAL ABSTRACT IN PDF FILE BELOW

    • Moschogianis_VA.pdf -

      PDF file

  • PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

    Original Research 

    Patients and Staff Identify Seven Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence To Decrease Staff Workload and Improve Patient Safety in Primary Care eVisits 

    Background and Goal: Although remote or electronic visits (eVisits) can increase access to health care for certain groups of patients, their use can increase staff workload and patient demand. Artificial intelligence (AI) may mitigate these outcomes. This study explored the views of staff and patients in primary care to inform the development of artificial intelligence (AI) features for eVisits.

    Study Approach:Researchers conducted interviews and focus groups with 16 primary care staff and 37 patients from 14 primary care practices in northwest England and London. Interviewees were asked about their views on the potential uses of AI during eVisits, risks, benefits, and likely challenges to its adoption into clinical practice. Transcripts were thematically analyzed to identify key themes.

    Main Results:         

    • Initial misconceptions and reservations: both groups were unsure what AI could or could not do; patients worried it might diagnose or prescribe without input from their physician, and staff questioned safety.

    • Perceived benefits included faster responses for patients and lighter workload for staff if AI handled routine tasks. Perceived risks included depersonalised care, data‑privacy fears, and the possibility that patients would have to enter symptoms perfectly for AI triage to work safely.

    Seven specific opportunities for AI during eVisits were identified and generally welcomed if they complemented (not replaced) clinician judgment: 

    • Workflow routing – AI could direct each request to the appropriate team member quickly.

    • Directing – It could reroute emergencies to emergency services and send non-urgent issues to pharmacies.

    • Prioritization – Urgent requests could be flagged so clinicians see them first.

    • Follow-up questions – AI could automatically request photos, questionnaires, or clarification after a submission.

    • Writing assistance – It could suggest editable response templates for common concerns like mental health.

    • Self-help information – Trusted educational links could be sent to patients without clinician effort.

    • Face-to-face booking – AI could automatically schedule in-person visits when a physical exam is likely needed.

    Why It Matters: These findings highlight seven AI opportunities, identified by patients and staff, that could decrease staff workload and improve patient safety. The results of this study may serve as guidance for developing and testing AI tools in primary care settings.

    Seven Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care Electronic Visits: Qualitative Study of Staff and Patient Views

    Susan Moschogianis, PhD, et al

    School of Health Sciences, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom 

    Visual Abstract


PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 23 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 23 (3)
Vol. 23, Issue 3
May/June 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain-Language Summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Seven Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care Electronic Visits: Qualitative Study of Staff and Patient Views
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Seven Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care Electronic Visits: Qualitative Study of Staff and Patient Views
Susan Moschogianis, Sarah Darley, Tessa Coulson, Niels Peek, Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi, Benjamin C. Brown
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2025, 23 (3) 214-222; DOI: 10.1370/afm.240292

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Seven Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care Electronic Visits: Qualitative Study of Staff and Patient Views
Susan Moschogianis, Sarah Darley, Tessa Coulson, Niels Peek, Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi, Benjamin C. Brown
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2025, 23 (3) 214-222; DOI: 10.1370/afm.240292
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family Physicians in Focused Practice in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Level Study of Trends From 1993/1994 Through 2021/2022
  • Agile Implementation of a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Dementia in Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • primary health care
  • general practice
  • electronic visits (eVisits)
  • artificial intelligence (AI)
  • qualitative research

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine