Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care

Patrick J. O’Connor, A. Lauren Crain, William A. Rush, JoAnn M. Sperl-Hillen, Jay J. Gutenkauf and Jane E. Duncan
The Annals of Family Medicine July 2005, 3 (4) 300-306; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.327
Patrick J. O’Connor
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Lauren Crain
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William A. Rush
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JoAnn M. Sperl-Hillen
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jay J. Gutenkauf
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane E. Duncan
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • The missing link between diabetes care provided and patient outcomes
    Carry M Renders
    Published on: 19 September 2005
  • We have a way to go!
    Jaan Sidorov
    Published on: 20 August 2005
  • Chronic Care Model
    Glenn R. Singer MD
    Published on: 13 August 2005
  • ACADEMIC DETAILING
    MARY E. ARENBERG
    Published on: 04 August 2005
  • Comment on 'Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care'
    Richard W. Grant
    Published on: 04 August 2005
  • Comments on O�Connor et al.
    Michael M. Engelgau, MD, MS
    Published on: 04 August 2005
  • EHR-work in progress
    Louis Spikol M.D.
    Published on: 02 August 2005
  • Beyond EMR Reminders and Alerts
    Jonathan Betz Brown, MPP, PhD
    Published on: 28 July 2005
  • Comment on 'Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care'
    Lawrence S. Phillips, M.D.
    Published on: 27 July 2005
  • Published on: (19 September 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for The missing link between diabetes care provided and patient outcomes
    The missing link between diabetes care provided and patient outcomes
    • Carry M Renders, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    The study of O’Connor showed improvements in the care provided, but this was not accompanied by favourable patient outcomes. Other studies, also those that involved very intensive and complex interventions, showed comparable results: favourable effects on the process of care but none or only very moderate effects on achieving strict metabolic control(1). This missing link can be explained by two different reasons: 1) Reg...

    Show More

    The study of O’Connor showed improvements in the care provided, but this was not accompanied by favourable patient outcomes. Other studies, also those that involved very intensive and complex interventions, showed comparable results: favourable effects on the process of care but none or only very moderate effects on achieving strict metabolic control(1). This missing link can be explained by two different reasons: 1) Regular review is not an important predictor for good metabolic control, and might therefore not be valid for the assessment of quality of care. 2)There are other factors that influence patient outcomes.

    A quantitative measurement was used as indicator for the process of care: the number of measurements. Perhaps a more qualitative measurement of the process of care predicts good metabolic control in a better way. It might have been possible that a GP did not respond appropriately to the information obtained from these regular measurements. In that case, a qualitative measurement i.e. if the GP had taken the right steps in adjusting the therapy of the patient as a result of the information obtained during the regular review, could be a more appropriate indicator of the process of care. Studies that emphasised individual therapy advice on how to achieve good metabolic control for the individual patient showed improved patient outcomes, although the improvements were moderately (2,3).

    A second reason for the missing link between the process of care and patient outcomes might be found in patient related factors. In diabetes care the patients themselves play an important role, as they have to adhere to life-style changes and often complex therapy regimens for the rest of their life. In general, the adherence of patients to diabetes regimens is reported to be poor (4). This (non-)adherence to therapy is influenced by various interacting patient characteristics, such as knowledge, motivation, attitudes, beliefs, perceptions and personal skills. Although health care providers may provide structured diabetes care in accordance with guidelines and with regular follow-up and give helpful recommendations and advice, the patients will decide which recommendations and advice they put into practice, how readiness and willingness they are to change lifestyle and what role they want to play in their own diabetes management. The consequences of these decisions are experienced and valued by the patients. Although both care-provider and patient determine patient outcomes, their priorities and expectations in diabetes management can differ. To achieve optimal quality care from both perspectives, the priorities and perceptions of both should be taken into account. So maybe next to interventions to improve structured diabetes care with regular review for all patients, more attention should be paid to an approach from behavioural and social science emphasising the patients’ point of view.

    1.Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin S, Wagner EH, Eijk JThM van, Assendelft WJJ. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings. A systematic review. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1821-33.

    2.Cagliero E, Levina EV, Nathan DM. Immediate feedback of HbA1c levels improves glycemic control in type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1999; 22:1785-9.

    3.Renders CM, Valk GD, De Sonnaville JJ, Twisk J, Kriegsman DM, Heine RJ, Van Eijk JT, Van Der Wal G. Quality of care for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus-a long-term comparison of two quality improvement programmes in the Netherlands. Diabet Med. 2003 Oct;20(10):846-852.

    4. Vermeire E, Wens J, Van Royen P, Biot Y, Hearnshaw H, Lindenmeyer A Interventions for improving adherence to treatment recommendations in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD003638. Review.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (20 August 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for We have a way to go!
    We have a way to go!
    • Jaan Sidorov, Danville, PA, USA

    O'Conner & Colleagues are to be commended for an excellent study of the impact of the electronic health record (EHR) on diabetes care. Lacking a prospective, randomized prospective trial, the authors did the next best thing: took advantage of a staggered roll-out of the intervention, using a parallel clinic site that - by System (HealthPartners) and patients - appeared to differ only by the presence or absence of th...

    Show More

    O'Conner & Colleagues are to be commended for an excellent study of the impact of the electronic health record (EHR) on diabetes care. Lacking a prospective, randomized prospective trial, the authors did the next best thing: took advantage of a staggered roll-out of the intervention, using a parallel clinic site that - by System (HealthPartners) and patients - appeared to differ only by the presence or absence of the EHR. This 'real world' study found an association of higher frequency of A1c testing with the EHR but not overall glycemic control. In fact, there was evidence that the implementation of the EHR in the 1st year may have disrupted clinic operations enough to cause a transient increase in the A1c. Combine these findings with the relative dearth of any controlled studies that show the EHR results in greater health care quality, and physicians may begin to wonder if the capital investments required to support an EHR will truly result in any benefit to their patients.

    Is all lost? Probably not:

    Not all clinical operations are predicated on scientific evidence of improvement in clinical outcomes. For example, the EHR may result in certain marketing advantages, better documentation, more accurate coding and more efficient information retrieval by physicians (including consultants) and patients (who may be able to access their information on- line). In other words, there are potential advantages in other health care domains that may make the capital investment worth it. Operative word is potential: we have a long way to go in better understanding this.

    Secondly, the implementation of this EHR in this setting was focused on the physicians. Our colleagues may find that a natural state of affairs, but that paradigm may be stifling. Basically, it makes little difference if the documentation, prompts/reminders and ordering is via paper or keyboard. But what if patients can enter their data themselves PRIOR to seeing the physician, if patients are prompted to ASK what their A1c is and if ordering is automated so that every person with a diagnosis code of 250 is scheduled for an A1c, and A1cs > 7 automatically lead to a suite of 'mass customization' options ranging from an educational email to a face to face appointment with a diabetes educator? The authors hint at this EHR ver 2.0 with discussion about decision support algorithms and patient activation.

    Physicians have probably reconciled themselves to the fact that disruptive information technology is coming to the bedside and their clinic exam rooms. We need to better understand what it can do and can't do. Right now, based on the findings to date, it would appear the EHR by itself is not enough to solve the twin challenges of quality and cost. However, our task is to understand how to solve quality and cost with all tools at hand - including the EHR.

    Jaan Sidorov, MD Medical Director, Care Coordination Geisinger Health Plan Danville PA

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (13 August 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Chronic Care Model
    Chronic Care Model
    • Glenn R. Singer MD, Bakersfield, CA USA

    Your study is a very valuable addition to support the increasing use of EMR, and demonstrating the obvious (process alone is not enough. Your work will help us avoid less than stellar initiatives in the future.

    Have you had any experience with the Chronic Care Model, e.g. Wagner, with a more patient centered focus?

    We are designing a system which will allow MD and patient access to an internet-based por...

    Show More

    Your study is a very valuable addition to support the increasing use of EMR, and demonstrating the obvious (process alone is not enough. Your work will help us avoid less than stellar initiatives in the future.

    Have you had any experience with the Chronic Care Model, e.g. Wagner, with a more patient centered focus?

    We are designing a system which will allow MD and patient access to an internet-based portal. And would like to know about the attempts of others.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (4 August 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for ACADEMIC DETAILING
    ACADEMIC DETAILING
    • MARY E. ARENBERG, PLYMOUTH,WI USA

    It has been shown by others already that simply knowing the guidelines and having an EMR are not enough to "translate research into practice." Academic detailing, in which a staff is brought to common ground of understanding (and accepting) the guidelines, regular reports of progress and, most important in our offices experience, involving and motivating an entire clinic staff results in better performance on clinical b...

    Show More

    It has been shown by others already that simply knowing the guidelines and having an EMR are not enough to "translate research into practice." Academic detailing, in which a staff is brought to common ground of understanding (and accepting) the guidelines, regular reports of progress and, most important in our offices experience, involving and motivating an entire clinic staff results in better performance on clinical benchmarks such as diabetes control. THis generally is a more satisfying experience anyway and usually results in more effective use of the tools that an EMR provides.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (4 August 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Comment on 'Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care'
    Comment on 'Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care'
    • Richard W. Grant, Boston, MA

    This excellent study by O’Connor et al yields at least three very important lessons for investigators engaged in research to translate clinical evidence into clinical practice (the so-called “second translational block”, with the first translational block from bench to bedside)(1):

    First, the day of the “before-and –after” study design for quality improvement in diabetes is over. Studies using informatics appli...

    Show More

    This excellent study by O’Connor et al yields at least three very important lessons for investigators engaged in research to translate clinical evidence into clinical practice (the so-called “second translational block”, with the first translational block from bench to bedside)(1):

    First, the day of the “before-and –after” study design for quality improvement in diabetes is over. Studies using informatics applications or other strategies to improve diabetes management must be performed with simultaneous controls (ideally with the intervention randomly assigned). This study by O’Connor joins an increasing number of well-designed controlled trials that have found little impact of various informatics- based disease management strategies above and beyond temporal changes in care among control groups (2-4).

    Second, interventions that are designed primarily to guide clinical decision-making at the time of a clinic visit (e.g. reminders and computerized decision support) may improve testing rates but rarely have any impact on risk factor levels. This may be a classic example of looking for one’s lost keys under the street lamps: electronic medical records are best suited for providing information, but what we really need are interventions that actually lead to changes in medication prescription. This may require venturing out towards system-level or behaviorally- oriented interventions to change physician practice patterns, particularly in the area of clinical inertia alluded to by Dr. Phillips.

    Third, we need to think beyond the narrow confines of the clinic visit to take a population-based perspective. Simply put, it is very difficult to make medication changes to lower HbA1c for a patient who hasn’t been seen in clinic for 12 months, or who when last seen was primarily concerned with dealing with other more pressing issues. Face-to- face time is brief, so future interventions must also find ways to allow physicians to efficiently monitor and manage their panel of patients that go beyond the traditional clinic visit (5).

    (1) Garfield, SA, Malozowski, S, Chin, MH, Venkat Narayan, KM, Glasgow, RE, Green, LW et al. Considerations for diabetes translational research in real-world settings.Diabetes Care. 2003 Sep;26(9):2670-4.

    (2) Grant RW, Cagliero E, Nathan DM, Singer DE, Chueh H, Meigs JB.et al. A Controlled Trial of Population Management: Diabetes Mellitus - Putting Evidence into Practice. Diabetes Care, 2004 27:2299-2305.

    (3) Murray MD, Harris LE, Overhage JM, Zhou XH, Eckert GJ, Smith FE, et al Failure of computerized treatment suggestions to improve health outcomes of outpatients with uncomplicated hypertension: results of a randomized controlled trial. Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Mar;24(3):324-37.

    (4) Tierney WM, Overhage JM, Murray MD, Harris LE, Zhou XH, Eckert GJ et al. Can computer-generated evidence-based care suggestions enhance evidence-based management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A randomized, controlled trial. Health Serv Res. 2005 Apr;40(2):477-97.

    (5) Lester WT, Grant RW, Barnett GO, Chueh HC. Facilitated Lipid Management Using Interactive E-mail: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Medinfo. 2004;2004:232-6.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (4 August 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Comments on O�Connor et al.
    Comments on O�Connor et al.
    • Michael M. Engelgau, MD, MS, Atlanta, GA

    Diabetes is already a major public health problem in the United States and the future U.S. diabetes burden is expected to increase dramatically. (1) Fortunately, however, several effective treatments to reduce or prevent diabetes-related complications are available (2), and much effort has gone into the development of evidence-base guidelines for delivery of these treatments. However, the existence of a guideline doe...

    Show More

    Diabetes is already a major public health problem in the United States and the future U.S. diabetes burden is expected to increase dramatically. (1) Fortunately, however, several effective treatments to reduce or prevent diabetes-related complications are available (2), and much effort has gone into the development of evidence-base guidelines for delivery of these treatments. However, the existence of a guideline does not ensure delivery of quality care, and in spite of much effort, the quality of diabetes care remains suboptimal in this country (2), regardless of a particular health care system, or population, or geographic location.

    In this issue, O’Connor et al reports on the use an electronic medical record (EMR) intervention to improve the quality of care for persons with diabetes. (3). While the intervention found improvement in the process of accessing risk factor control care, this improvement did not result in better risk factor control (i.e., in lower A1C and lipid levels). There currently is much debate about whether act of measuring a risk factor leads to better risk factor control. Further study is needed.

    The measurement of quality indicators is important, not only because it can help health care systems focus their efforts more efficiently, but also because the process of measuring these indicators and reporting results can draw much needed attention to the quality improvement efforts. The old adage, “what gets measured, gets done” may apply in this case. Quality indicators can also be very useful outcome measures in as the case for O’Connor et al’s study. We have a long way to go toward getting optimal care for persons with diabetes - but interventions that improve the quality of diabetes care will help get us there.

    Michael M. Engelgau, MD, MS, Associate Director, Division of Diabetes Translation, CDC

    Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of CDC.

    1. Engelgau MM, Geiss LS, Saaddine JB, Boyle JP, Benjamin SM, Gregg EW, et al. The evolving diabetes burden in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:945-50.

    2. Narayan KMV, Benjamin E, Gregg EW, Norris SL, Engelgau MM. Diabetes translation research: where are we and where do we want to be? Ann Intern Med 2004;140:958-63.

    3. O’Connor PJ, Crain AL, Rush WA, Sperl-Hillen JM, Gutenkauf JJ, Duncan JE. Impact of electronic medical record on diabetes quality of care. Ann Fam Med 2005;3:300-6.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (2 August 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for EHR-work in progress
    EHR-work in progress
    • Louis Spikol M.D., Allentown, Pa.
    • Other Contributors:

    We were pleased to see that an electronic health record could act effectively as a system for reminding clinicians regarding proper testing as well as proper intervals for testing. As your study so aptly demonstrates, this can work very effectively with an electronic system. We would submit that actually affecting the parameter, in this case hemoglobin A1C is certainly more difficult to achieve and is dependent on man...

    Show More

    We were pleased to see that an electronic health record could act effectively as a system for reminding clinicians regarding proper testing as well as proper intervals for testing. As your study so aptly demonstrates, this can work very effectively with an electronic system. We would submit that actually affecting the parameter, in this case hemoglobin A1C is certainly more difficult to achieve and is dependent on many more factors than just testing frequency. We are optimistic rather than disappointed regarding this result and believe that computerized healthcare information technology solutions still have a long way to go regarding functionality and sophistication. In addition as with any new method of taking care of patients, providers and their offices will gradually come up with very effective ways to improve the quality of patient care.

    With very kind regards,

    Physician Staff at the Center for Health Information Technology David C. Kibbe, MD MBA Louis Spikol, MD Steven Waldren, MD

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (28 July 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Beyond EMR Reminders and Alerts
    Beyond EMR Reminders and Alerts
    • Jonathan Betz Brown, MPP, PhD, Portland Oregon USA

    O’Connor and colleagues address an important and timely topic—do EMR reminders cause clinicians to treat chronic illness more appropriately? Opportunities to observe controlled comparisons of EMR implementation are rare and valuable. O’Connor et al. deserve our thanks for making the most of one such opportunity.

    Despite the technical limitations of O’Connor et al.’s report—very small patient sample size, only...

    Show More

    O’Connor and colleagues address an important and timely topic—do EMR reminders cause clinicians to treat chronic illness more appropriately? Opportunities to observe controlled comparisons of EMR implementation are rare and valuable. O’Connor et al. deserve our thanks for making the most of one such opportunity.

    Despite the technical limitations of O’Connor et al.’s report—very small patient sample size, only quasi-experimental control, just one clinic per treatment arm, and an ADA treatment-threshold recommendation (8.0% HbA1c) that, until 2004, was well above the mean HbA1c in the study sites--I strongly agree with the authors’ conclusion that we need more sophisticated clinical decision support and more potent patient activation applications than crude alerts provide. At Kaiser Permanente Northwest, which has had the Epic system that O’Connor evaluated since 1995, and predecessor systems since the mid-1980s, we are now preparing to pilot a computer simulation-based evidence integrator to calculate the most valuable clinical actions for each individual patient with diabetes. This system also will give clinicians graphic displays of the impacts of treatments that can be shown to patients, plus the capacity to order all associated prescriptions, tests, referrals and messages with a single mouse-click. In a clinical setting in which so many alerts and reminders are now built into the EMR that many clinicians claim to ignore all of them, front-line primary care clinicians view this new approach with genuine enthusiasm. Consistent with O’Connor et al.’s conclusions, what they especially like is its potential to (1) end-run the logjam of alerts, single-purpose guidelines, and hard-to-personalize trial data and (2) get patients to agree to treatment.

    Kaiser Permanente’s inter-regional experience also supports O’Connor’s final observation that, “in the absence of more advanced EMR capabilities, less expensive and less disruptive care-improvement strategies may improve chronic disease care as effectively as EMRs.” At various times, KP regions have made abrupt improvements in HbA1c, lipid levels, retinal screening rates and even “hard” outcomes like cardiovascular event rates using paper records, person-to-person contact, and other non-electronic means. However, data from computer systems were hugely useful in supporting all of these approaches. The limitations of crude electronic alerts and reminders should not blind us to the enormous total value of EMRs, or delay us in achieving what I see as the next big stage of evidence-based medicine, personalized (and ultimately genetically informed) treatment recommendations calculated from data archived by EMRs.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (27 July 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Comment on 'Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care'
    Comment on 'Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care'
    • Lawrence S. Phillips, M.D., Atlanta, USA

    O’Connor et al’s careful analysis yields an important message: if the clinical problem is difficult, improving process measures doesn’t get the job done. Their findings are similar to those of Meigs et al (1), who reported that a web-based decision support tool, the “Disease Management Application”, improved measurement of A1c but had little impact on A1c levels.

    If process measures are insufficient, what sh...

    Show More

    O’Connor et al’s careful analysis yields an important message: if the clinical problem is difficult, improving process measures doesn’t get the job done. Their findings are similar to those of Meigs et al (1), who reported that a web-based decision support tool, the “Disease Management Application”, improved measurement of A1c but had little impact on A1c levels.

    If process measures are insufficient, what should the next focus be?

    Attaining therapeutic targets can be limited by “clinical inertia” – the failure of health care providers to intensify therapy when clinically indicated (2). Diabetes-related clinical inertia has been linked to inadequate glycemic control, and appears to be more common in primary care settings than in specialist practices (3;4). Accordingly, it is possible that use of electronic medical records to help overcome clinical inertia would lower A1c levels.

    Unfortunately, this may not be simple. To be effective, prompts aimed at provider action must be patient-specific and generated in real time, which demands both complex therapeutic algorithms and extensive hardware/software support – presently unavailable in most settings. Moreover, the simple existence of the prompts may be insufficient to alter provider behavior. At Emory, we found that computer-generated hard copy “reminders” to intensify therapy which were timely and patient-specific had little impact on either provider behavior or A1c levels (5;6). In contrast, giving providers feedback on their performance was effective in both domains – but also much more labor-intensive.

    While information management – with or without electronic medical records – will undoubtedly be required to assure good care for patients with diabetes, the ideal application has yet to be demonstrated.

    Lawrence S. Phillips, M.D., Professor of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine

    (1) Meigs JB, Cagliero E, Dubey A, Murphy-Sheehy P, Gildesgame C, Chueh H et al. A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management. Diab Care. 2003;26:250-257.

    (2) Phillips LS, Branch WT, Jr., Cook CB, Doyle JP, El-Kebbi IM, Gallina DL et al. Clinical inertia. Ann Int Med. 2001;135:825-34.

    (3) Grant RW, Buse JB, Meigs JB. Quality of diabetes care in U.S. academic medical centers: low rates of medical regimen change. Diab Care. 2005;28:337-442.

    (4) Shah BR, Hux JE, Laupacis A, Zinman B, van Walraven C. Clinical inertia in response to inadequate glycemic control: do specialists differ from primary care physicians? Diab Care. 2005;28:600-606.

    (5) Phillips LS, Kolm P, Ziemer DC, Cook CB, Gallina DL, Barnes CS et al. An endocrinologist-supported intervention improves provider behavior in the management of type 2 diabetes in the primary care setting. Annual Meeting of the American Diabetes Association, #1189-P (abstract). Diabetes. 2004;53 (Suppl 2):A289-A290.

    (6) Phillips LS, Ziemer DC, Kolm GP, Gallina DL, Cook CB, Barnes CS et al. An endocrinologist-supported intervention aimed at overcoming clinical inertia improves diabetes management in a primary care site. Annual Meeting of the American Diabetes Association, #215-OR (abstract). Diabetes. 2004;53 (Suppl. 2):A50.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 3 (4)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 3 (4)
Vol. 3, Issue 4
1 Jul 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care
Patrick J. O’Connor, A. Lauren Crain, William A. Rush, JoAnn M. Sperl-Hillen, Jay J. Gutenkauf, Jane E. Duncan
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2005, 3 (4) 300-306; DOI: 10.1370/afm.327

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Diabetes Quality of Care
Patrick J. O’Connor, A. Lauren Crain, William A. Rush, JoAnn M. Sperl-Hillen, Jay J. Gutenkauf, Jane E. Duncan
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2005, 3 (4) 300-306; DOI: 10.1370/afm.327
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Primary care teams reported actions to improve medication safety: a qualitative study with insights in high reliability organising
  • Efficiency over thoroughness in laboratory testing decision making in primary care: findings from a realist review
  • Evaluating a post-implementation electronic medical record training intervention for diabetes management in primary care
  • Evaluating Diabetes Outcomes and Costs Within an Ambulatory Setting: A Strategic Approach Utilizing a Clinical Decision Support System
  • Adopting electronic medical records: Are they just electronic paper records?
  • Implementation of electronic medical records: Theory-informed qualitative study
  • Implementation of electronic medical records: Effect on the provision of preventive services in a pay-for-performance environment
  • Impact of Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support on Diabetes Care: A Randomized Trial
  • Outpatient EHR-Based Diabetes Clinical Decision Support That Works: Lessons Learned From Implementing Diabetes Wizard
  • Using Electronic Health Records to Improve Outpatient Diabetes Care: Preface
  • Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home and Preventive Services Delivery
  • Use of electronic medical records: Reminders and decision aids for chronic disease management
  • The Medical Home: Growing Evidence to Support a New Approach to Primary Care
  • Incorporating PDA Use in Diabetes Self-Care: A Central Texas Primary Care Research Network (CenTexNet) Study
  • Improving Outcomes for High-Risk Diabetics Using Information Systems
  • Electronic Medical Records and Diabetes Quality of Care: Results From a Sample of Family Medicine Practices
  • Crossing the Quality Chasm for Diabetes Care: The Power of One Physician, His Team, and Systems Thinking
  • Health Information Technology: Does It Facilitate Or Hinder Rapid Learning?
  • How Can Practice-based Research Contribute to the Elimination of Health Disparities?
  • Use of Chronic Care Model Elements Is Associated With Higher-Quality Care for Diabetes
  • It Ain't Necessarily So: The Electronic Health Record And The Unlikely Prospect Of Reducing Health Care Costs.
  • Impact of Office Systems and Improvement Strategies on Costs of Care for Adults With Diabetes.
  • Physicians, Patients, and the Electronic Health Record: An Ethnographic Analysis
  • Strength from Vulnerability
  • In This Issue: Patient Outcomes, the Process of Care, and the Capacity for Innovation
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family-Based Interventions to Promote Weight Management in Adults: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India
  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
  • Other topics:
    • Health informatics
    • Quality improvement

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine