Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

The Doctor Who Cried: A Qualitative Study About the Doctor’s Vulnerability

Kirsti Malterud and Hanne Hollnagel
The Annals of Family Medicine July 2005, 3 (4) 348-352; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.314
Kirsti Malterud
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hanne Hollnagel
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Strength in vulnerability
    Lucy M. Candib
    Published on: 01 August 2005
  • Compassion and Vulnerability
    Howard Brody
    Published on: 29 July 2005
  • Published on: (1 August 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Strength in vulnerability
    Strength in vulnerability
    • Lucy M. Candib, Worcester, MA, USA

    Kirsti Malterud and Hanne Hollnagel, leading European theorists about gender and health in general practice, are experts in finding the positives in areas where medicine has consistently focused on the negative. Their previous work together has identified those factors that sick patients bring to their health--a patient-centred salutogenetic approach—that identifies their resources, agency, and strength rather than their...

    Show More

    Kirsti Malterud and Hanne Hollnagel, leading European theorists about gender and health in general practice, are experts in finding the positives in areas where medicine has consistently focused on the negative. Their previous work together has identified those factors that sick patients bring to their health--a patient-centred salutogenetic approach—that identifies their resources, agency, and strength rather than their risks and vulnerabilities.(1-5) In this article they address what initially appears to be a weakness—when doctors drop their guard and reveal their feelings and experiences to patients--and again they make clear that an act of apparent vulnerability can actually comprise an area of strength. We are also fortunate to gain an introduction to their relatively spartan methodology in which the participants write about their personal experiences in the third person, generating highly personal material that could then be examined with an objective and critical eye. Experts in the use of paradox, Malterud and Hollnagel, teach us to find health in sick people, find strength in doctors’ vulnerability, and find objective ways to study doctors’ personal experiences. We are fortunate to have their work published in our journal. Hopefully this taste will lead readers to pursue their other research which is fortunately available to us in English.

    Pushing Malterud’s and Hollnagel’s work a step further, my colleague Sara Shields describes in this issue her experience of vulnerability in telling a pregnant woman that her 30 week fetus had died in utero.(6) In an understated way, Shields makes clear that she shared this painful experience with the family practice resident who was actually the patient’s own doctor. Revealing ourselves to our patients at critical moments can be an act of strength that promotes healing. Yet obviously not all forms of self-revelation or sharing are useful or appropriate.(7) Examining this process with residents and helping them discover and use their own vulnerabilities in the service of the patient’s best interest is the next step.

    REFERENCES

    1. Hollnagel H, Malterud K. From risk factors to health resources in medical practice.[see comment]. Medicine, Health Care & Philosophy. 2000;3(3):257-264.

    2. Hollnagel H, Malterud K, Witt K. Men's self-assessed personal health resources: approaching patients' strong points in general practice. Family Practice. 2000;17(6):529-534.

    3. Malterud K, Hollnagel H. Encouraging the strengths of women patients. A case study from general practice on empowering dialogues. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 1999;27(4):254-259.

    4. Malterud K, Hollnagel H. Talking with women about personal health resources in general practice. Key questions about salutogenesis. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 1998;16(2):66-71.

    5. Malterud K, Hollnagel H. Women's self-assessed personal health resources. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 1997;15(4):163- 168.

    6. Shields SG. On This Day of Mothers and Sons. Ann Fam Med. July 1, 2005 2005;3(4):367-368.

    7. Candib LM. Medicine and the Family: A Feminist Perspective. New York: Basic Books; 1995.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (29 July 2005)
    Page navigation anchor for Compassion and Vulnerability
    Compassion and Vulnerability
    • Howard Brody, East Lansing, MI USA

    Malterud and Hollnagel provide valuable material for study, both by exploring physician vulnerability in an open-ended, qualitative fashion, and also by distinguishing spontaneous disclosure of emotion from considered sharing of experience.

    It is useful to explore this material further using an analysis of suffering and compassion created by Warren Reich.(1) Reich's framework is grounded in the etymology of co...

    Show More

    Malterud and Hollnagel provide valuable material for study, both by exploring physician vulnerability in an open-ended, qualitative fashion, and also by distinguishing spontaneous disclosure of emotion from considered sharing of experience.

    It is useful to explore this material further using an analysis of suffering and compassion created by Warren Reich.(1) Reich's framework is grounded in the etymology of compassion, literally, "to suffer with." He reminds us that there can be no compassion without vulnerability. If I am not willing to experience my patient's suffering, and therefore become vulnerable to suffering myself, I can never offer my patient true compassion.

    Reich suggests that compassion can be viewed as having three phases. Silent compassion accepts the fact that the sufferer is usually, at first, simply overwhelmed by the immensity of the suffering and of the loss that caused it; words at this stage are insufficient and bothersome. The compassionate physician must demonstrate a willingness simply to be with the suffering patient. The silent act of handing a weeping patient a Kleenex is perhaps the most common manifestation of this phase of compassion in our everyday office practice.

    Expressive compassion follows later when the sufferer herself is ready to speak about the suffering and to try to explain and to place a meaning upon it. The patient here needs a sensitive interlocutor who will respond in an encouraging way to the patient's search for meaning--for a story to place the suffering in the larger context of one's life and of the cosmos. (2) The patient does not need a physician who will rush in with a handy, prefabricated statement designed to dismiss or minimize the suffering--"it can't be as bad as all that" or "just think of those who have it worse than you."

    The first two phases, silent compassion and expressive compassion, make up the usual, desired clinical intervention. Reich insists that another phase must follow later--new identity in compassion. We cannot be truly open to experience the patient's suffering and yet remain unchanged by the experience. This is what "vulnerability" ultimately entails. The physicians in Malterud and Hollnagel's study were, in effect, processing this final phase of compassion in their joint discussions. The primary application of Reich's phase analysis to the Malterud- Hollnagel distinction is to point out the reason why considered sharing of experience is somewhat more perilous than spontaneous disclosure of emotion.

    Spontaneous disclosure of the physician's emotion may occur readily during silent compassion, and forms an especially meaningful part of silent compassion. Spontaneous displays of real emotion can create a tremendously powerful impression in the patient that the physician has truly opened herself to the patient's experience and that something of the immensity of that experience has been shared between them. As the interview data suggest, patients almost always respond very positively to such disclosure.

    By contrast, considered sharing of experience forms a part of expressive compassion and is open to the danger of imposing a physician- generated meaning. The physician's sense of what counts as a similar or analogous experience of his own might be at odds with the meaning that the patient is in the process of constructing. The physician who tells the patient, "You know, the same thing happened to me when . . ." might generate the response, "Yes, that's exactly how I felt myself." But it is possible that the response will instead be, "No, it wasn't like that for me at all, you really don't understand." Lucy Candib, in the earlier paper cited by Malterud and Hollnagel (3), offers an excellent discussion of how appropriately to share past experiences with carefully selected patients, without inappropriately imposing the physician's own agenda.

    Family physicians naturally desire to offer a compassionate presence to our patients. Malterud and Hollnagel's work, supplementing Candib's earlier writing, continues to deepen our understanding of how to approach this task.

    1. Reich WT. Speaking of suffering: a moral account of compassion. Soundings 1989; 72:83-108.

    2. Brody H. Stories of Sickness, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.

    3. Candib LM. What doctors tell about themselves to patients: implications for intimacy and reciprocity in the relationship. Fam Med 1987; 19:23-30.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 3 (4)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 3 (4)
Vol. 3, Issue 4
1 Jul 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Doctor Who Cried: A Qualitative Study About the Doctor’s Vulnerability
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Doctor Who Cried: A Qualitative Study About the Doctor’s Vulnerability
Kirsti Malterud, Hanne Hollnagel
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2005, 3 (4) 348-352; DOI: 10.1370/afm.314

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
The Doctor Who Cried: A Qualitative Study About the Doctor’s Vulnerability
Kirsti Malterud, Hanne Hollnagel
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2005, 3 (4) 348-352; DOI: 10.1370/afm.314
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Vulnerability, survival and shame in Nina Raines Tiger Country
  • To self-disclose or not self-disclose? A systematic review of clinical self-disclosure in primary care
  • How the Medical Culture Contributes to Coworker-Perpetrated Harassment and Abuse of Family Physicians
  • Toward an Ecosystemic Approach to Chronic Care Design and Practice in Primary Care
  • Effects of a Couple Communication Program on Marital Adjustment
  • Strength from Vulnerability
  • In This Issue: Subtle Clinical Policy
  • In This Issue: Patient Outcomes, the Process of Care, and the Capacity for Innovation
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Performance-Based Reimbursement, Illegitimate Tasks, Moral Distress, and Quality Care in Primary Care: A Mediation Model of Longitudinal Data
  • Adverse Outcomes Associated With Inhaled Corticosteroid Use in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Family-Based Interventions to Promote Weight Management in Adults: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Qualitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Professional practice
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Relationship
  • Other topics:
    • Communication / decision making
    • Mindfulness and reflection

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine