Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief
    • Past Issues in Brief
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
    • Associate Editor Opening
    • Current Opportunities
    • Job Board
  • COVID-19
    • Preprint Collection
    • Casenotes Blog

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief
    • Past Issues in Brief
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
    • Associate Editor Opening
    • Current Opportunities
    • Job Board
  • COVID-19
    • Preprint Collection
    • Casenotes Blog
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

The Inverse Care Law: Clinical Primary Care Encounters in Deprived and Affluent Areas of Scotland

Stewart W. Mercer and Graham C. M. Watt
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2007, 5 (6) 503-510; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.778
Stewart W. Mercer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Graham C. M. Watt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Relationship between psychological distress and comorbidity in high-and low-deprivation areas.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Distribution of clinical encounter duration in areas of high-and low-deprivation.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    GP stress by clinical encounter duration in areas of high-and low-deprivation.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Patient enablement by clinical encounter duration in complex encounters in areas of high-and low-deprivation.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of Patients Visiting General Practitioners in Poor and Affluent Areas of Scotland

    CharacteristicsMost Deprived Areas n (%)Least Deprived Areas n (%)P Value
    * A measure of psychological distress on the General Health Questionnaire – 12,11 with a score of 4 or more.
    Emotional distress Caseness*652 (41.3)273 (28.6)<.001
    Comorbidity: No. of chronic conditions.008
        0485 (24.7)271 (25.2)
        1491 (25.0)320 (29.7)
        2387 (19.7)223 (20.7)
        3 or more599 (30.5)262 (24.3)
    General health<.001
        Very good206 (11.3)166 (16.1)
        Good471 (25.9)375 (36.5)
        Fair665 (36.6)339 (33.0)
        Bad383 (21.1)122 (11.9)
        Very bad94 (5.2)26 (2.5)
    Long-term illness
        Yes975 (53.7)432 (42.1)<.001
    Job status<.001
        Employed651 (37.9)516 (51.8)
        Unemployed (looking)115 (6.7)36 (3.6)
        Unemployed (unable)434 (25.3)103 (10.3)
        School or full-time equivalent76 (4.4)63 (6.3)
        Retired247 (14.4)209 (21.0)
        Caring for home/family170 (9.9)61 (6.1)
    Home<.001
        Owner occupier732 (40.6)833 (81.3)
        Rented981 (54.2)140 (13.6)
        Other92 (5.1)51 (5.0)
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Clinical Encounter Characteristics: Patient Access to a General Practitioner

    CharacteristicsMost Deprived Areas n (%)Least Deprived Areas n (%)P Value
    Scheduled encounter1,612 (83.2)968 (90.6)<.001
    Access, days<.001
        0–3491 (34.0)487 (48.3)
        >31,146 (66.0)521 (51.7)
    Rating<.001
        Very poor106 (6.2)17 (1.8)
        Poor241 (14.2)76 (8.0)
        Fair461 (27.1)202 (21.2)
        Good398 (23.4)242 (25.4)
        Very good290 (17.1)219 (23.0)
        Excellent203 (11.9)198 (20.8)
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Number of Problems to Discuss or Reason for Visiting a General Practitioner

    Problem CharacteristicsMost Deprived Areas n (%)Least Deprived Areas n (%)P Value
    No. of problems<.001
        1712 (47.7)545 (59.0)
        2559 (37.5)309 (33.4)
        >2221 (14.8)224 (7.5)
    Acute or chronic.093
        New problem451 (29.3)304 (29.4)
        Long-standing612 (33.2)393 (38.0)
        Both691 (37.5)336 (32.5)
    Nature of problem<.001
        Physical1127 (65.9)780 (78.2)
        Psychosocial295 (17.3)101 (10.1)
        Physical + psychosocial222 (13.0)94 (9.4)
        Administrative66 (3.9)23 (2.3)
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Characteristics of Clinical Encounters With a General Practitioner (GP) in the Most Deprived and Least Deprived Areas of Scotland, by Type of Consultation

    Consultations for Physical ProblemsConsultations for Psychosocial Problems
    CharacteristicMost Deprived Areas Mean (SD)Least Deprived Areas Mean (SD)P ValueMost Deprived Areas Mean (SD)Least Deprived Areas Mean (SD)P Value
    * Based on the General Health Questionnaire-12 caseness cutoff score of 4 or more.
    † Rated on a scale from 1 to 5, in which 1 = not at all, 5 = very well.
    ‡ Rated on a scale of 1 to 10, in which higher scores indicate higher empathy.
    § Rated on a scale of 1 to 6, in which higher scores indicate more enablement.
    || Rated on a scale from 0 to 10, in which 0 = no stress and 10 = very much stress.
    Age, years45.4 (17.9)47.5 (17.9).01539.5 (14.0)43.7 (14.8).003
    General health score*2.7 (1.0)2.4 (1.0)<.0013.22 (1.0)2.8 (1.0)<.001
    No. of problems1.6 (0.9)1.5 (0.7)<.0012.0 (0.9)1.7 (0.7).003
    Knows doctor†3.6 (1.4)3.5 (1.3).2853.8 (1.3)3.6 (1.2).127
    GP empathy score‡41.1 (0.9)40.6 (0.9).30040.9 (9.1)42.2 (8.6).156
    Consultation duration, minutes8.0 (4.0)8.4 (4.5).0458.9 (4.3)9.6 (4.9).076
    Patient enablement score§4.0 (3.8)3.9 (3.5).5553.3 (3.4)4.1 (3.5).023
    GP stress index||3.8 (2.4)3.3 (1.6)<.0013.9 (2.3)3.3 (1.5)<.001

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Appendix

    Supplemental Appendix. Sample Frame and Reliability of CARE Measure and PEI

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental data: Appendix - PDF file, 3 pages, 108 KB
  • The Article in Brief

    The Inverse Care Law: Clinical Primary Care Encounters in Deprived and Affluent Areas of Scotland

    Stewart W. Mercer, MBChB, PhD , and colleagues

    Background The inverse care law states that good medical care is least available where it is most needed. This study aims to learn more about the inverse care law by examining primary care doctor visits in the most and least deprived areas of Scotland.

    What This Study Found Patients in most deprived areas had more serious psychological problems, more long-term illness, and a greater number of medical conditions than patients in least deprived areas. Although patients in deprived areas had more problems to discuss, their doctor visits were usually shorter than in less deprived areas. General practitioners working in deprived areas were more stressed than those in the least deprived areas.

    Implications

    • The increased burden of ill health and multiple medical conditions in poor communities results in high demands on primary care doctor visits.
    • If the inverse care law is to be reversed, health care policies must address inequalities in public health by focusing on the primary care setting.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 5 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine
Vol. 5, Issue 6
1 Nov 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
  • Annual Indexes
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Inverse Care Law: Clinical Primary Care Encounters in Deprived and Affluent Areas of Scotland
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Inverse Care Law: Clinical Primary Care Encounters in Deprived and Affluent Areas of Scotland
Stewart W. Mercer, Graham C. M. Watt
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2007, 5 (6) 503-510; DOI: 10.1370/afm.778

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
The Inverse Care Law: Clinical Primary Care Encounters in Deprived and Affluent Areas of Scotland
Stewart W. Mercer, Graham C. M. Watt
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2007, 5 (6) 503-510; DOI: 10.1370/afm.778
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • How many medications do doctors in primary care use? An observational study of the DU90% indicator in primary care in England
  • Primary care consultation length by deprivation and multimorbidity in England: an observational study using electronic patient records
  • Seasonal influenza programme expansion
  • Consultation length by multimorbidity and deprivation: observational study using electronic patient records
  • Persistent inequalities in Hospice at Home provision
  • Multimorbidity and GP burnout
  • Influence of patient multimorbidity on GP burnout: a survey and register-based study in Danish general practice
  • Effectiveness of Community-Links Practitioners in Areas of High Socioeconomic Deprivation
  • New alumni EXperiences of Training and independent Unsupervised Practice (NEXT-UP): protocol for a cross-sectional study of early career general practitioners
  • Comorbidity and healthcare use for individuals with CVD in the Ireland: a cross-sectional, population-based study
  • Professional resilience in GPs working in areas of socioeconomic deprivation: a qualitative study in primary care
  • The inverse care law revisited: a continuing blot on the record of the National Health Service
  • Influences of socioeconomic deprivation on GPs decisions to refer patients to cardiology: a qualitative study
  • Effectiveness of a peer-mediated educational intervention in improving general practitioner diagnostic assessment and management of dementia: a cluster randomised controlled trial
  • Delivering a primary care-based social prescribing initiative: a qualitative study of the benefits and challenges
  • Multimorbidity and Socioeconomic Deprivation in Primary Care Consultations
  • International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries
  • General practice and the Sustainability and Transformation imperatives
  • Mining for Deep End GPs: a group forged with steel in Yorkshire and Humber
  • PIPc study: development of indicators of potentially inappropriate prescribing in children (PIPc) in primary care using a modified Delphi technique
  • Accounting for multimorbidity in pay for performance: a modelling study using UK Quality and Outcomes Framework data
  • General Practitioners Empathy and Health Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study of Consultations in Areas of High and Low Deprivation
  • In This Issue: Confronting Constraints on Individual Behavior & Outcomes
  • General practice funding underpins the persistence of the inverse care law: cross-sectional study in Scotland
  • Social equity in health care
  • Discretion is the better part of general practice
  • SurgiCal Obesity Treatment Study (SCOTS): protocol for a national prospective cohort study of patients undergoing bariatric surgery in Scotland
  • Patient-reported areas for quality improvement in general practice: a cross-sectional survey
  • Relationships of Multimorbidity and Income With Hospital Admissions in 3 Health Care Systems
  • Managing patients with multimorbidity in primary care
  • Multimorbidity in a marginalised, street-health Australian population: a retrospective cohort study
  • The influence of socioeconomic deprivation on multimorbidity at different ages: a cross-sectional study
  • Looking beyond "the house of care" for long term conditions
  • The effect of physical multimorbidity, mental health conditions and socioeconomic deprivation on unplanned admissions to hospital: a retrospective cohort study
  • Patient centredness and the outcome of primary care consultations with patients with depression in areas of high and low socioeconomic deprivation
  • Multimorbidity and the inverse care law in primary care
  • Chronic disease detection and access: does access improve detection, or does detection make access more difficult?
  • Multimorbidity in primary care: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies
  • From child health surveillance to child health promotion, and onwards: a tale of babies and bathwater
  • Socio-economic differences in long-term psychiatric work disability: prospective cohort study of onset, recovery and recurrence
  • Resilience among doctors who work in challenging areas: a qualitative study
  • Patient encounters in very deprived areas
  • Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study
  • How useful are clinical guidelines for the management of obesity in general practice?
  • The Problem of Fragmentation and the Need for Integrative Solutions
  • Deprivation, demography, and the distribution of general practice:: challenging the conventional wisdom of inverse care
  • Commentary: What is the NHS for?
  • The NHS at 60: time to end the fairy tale
  • Further observations on enablement
  • No Job Is Finished Until the Electronic Work Is Done
  • In This Issue: Equity Global Theme Issue on Poverty and Human Development
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Medical Practice Variation Among Primary Care Physicians: 1 Decade, 14 Health Services, and 3,238,498 Patient-Years
  • Pregnancy Medicaid Improvements in a Nonexpansion State After the Affordable Care Act
  • Diagnostic Agreement Between Telemedicine on Social Networks and Teledermatology Centers
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
    • Mental health
  • Person groups:
    • Vulnerable populations
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
    • Professional practice
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Access
  • Other topics:
    • Multimorbidity
    • Disparities in health and health care

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Online First

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2021 Annals of Family Medicine