Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

What Drives Prescribing of Asthma Medication to Children? A Multilevel Population-Based Study

Mira G. P. Zuidgeest, Liset van Dijk, Peter Spreeuwenberg, Henriëtte A. Smit, Bert Brunekreef, Hubertus G. M. Arets, Madelon Bracke and Hubert G. M. Leufkens
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2009, 7 (1) 32-40; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.910
Mira G. P. Zuidgeest
PharmD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liset van Dijk
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Spreeuwenberg
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henriëtte A. Smit
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bert Brunekreef
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hubertus G. M. Arets
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Madelon Bracke
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hubert G. M. Leufkens
PharmD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Child Characteristics and Results From the Univariate Analyses

    Child CharacteristicsChildren Without an Asthma Prescription (n = 42,997)Children Prescribed Asthma Medication (n = 3,374)OR (95% CI)
    CI = confidence interval; GP = general practitioner; ICPC = International Classification for Primary Care; OR = odds ratio; URTI = upper respiratory tract infection.
    a Significant values P<.05.
    b Average number of prescriptions issued per patient during 1 year.
    c Average number of contacts with GP during 1 year.
    d Referrals for respiratory complaints/diseases or to a lung specialist.
    e Dichotomous variables of the ICPC codes R02 (shortness of breath/dyspnea), R03 (wheezing), R05 (cough), R74 (acute upper respiratory tract infection), R78 (acute bronchitis/bronchiolitis), R81 (pneumonia), R96 (asthma), and R97 (allergic rhinitis).
    Mean age (SD; range), y9.1 (4.8; 1–17)7.7 (4.9; 1–17)0.94a (0.93–0.95)
    Age <6 y, No. (%)11,948 (25.8)1,386 (41.1)1.82a (1.69–1.96)
    Sex, male, No. (%)21,798 (50.7)1,922 (57.0)1.29a (1.20–1.39)
    Antibiotic prescriptions, No. (SD; range)b0.2 (0.6; 0–13)0.6 (1.0; 0–12)1.85a (1.77–1.93)
    Oral corticosteroid prescriptions, No. (SD; range)b0.003 (0.11 ;0–12)0.046 (0.26;0–5)4.69a (3.59–6.12)
    Contacts with GP, No. (SD; range)c2.1 (2.6; 0–35)5.2 (4.0; 0–34)1.30a (1.29–1.31)
    Children with 0 contacts in registration year, No. (%)13,786 (32.1)129 (3.8)—
    Referrals, No. (%)d93 (0.3)94 (3.6)13.0a (12.2–13.9)
    Registered diseases and complaints,e No. (%)
        Asthma227 (0.5)1,739 (51.5)260a (221–305)
        Shortness of breath/dyspnea92 (0.2)144 (4.3)21.1a (15.9–28.1)
        Wheezing16 (0.0)63 (1.9)55.2a (30.7–99.2)
        Cough2082 (4.8)873 (25.9)6.90a (6.26–7.59)
        Acute bronchitis/ bronchiolitis769 (1.8)622 (18.4)13.5a (11.9–15.3)
        Acute URTI3,267 (7.6)674 (20.0)3.06a (2.78–3.38)
        Pneumonia241 (0.6)133 (3.9)7.24a (5.74–9.15)
        Allergic rhinitis1,029 (2.4)252 (7.5)3.24a (2.78–3.77)
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Prescription of Asthma Medication by Age-Group and Type of Medication

    Age-Groups, Years
    Medication Type1–2 n = 5,2933–5 n = 8,0416–8 n = 8,3359–11 n = 8,35012–14 n = 8,19615–17 n = 8,156Total n = 46,371
    ICS = inhaled corticosteroids; LABA = long-acting β2-agonists; SABA = short-acting β2-agonists.
    a We calculated percentage of children using some sort of asthma medication, not percentage of total population; therapy groups therefore add up to 100%. Therapy groups are defined as follows: SABA = monotherapy with short-acting β2-agonists; ICS = monotherapy with inhaled corticosteroids; SABA+ICS = combination therapy of these 2 medication groups (10.3% of children in this group also received 1 or more other asthma medicines, of which 82% were LABA); other medicines = all other therapies.
    All asthma medication, %10.910.17.06.15.75.27.3
    Medication groups, %
        SABA8.07.04.94.54.53.65.3
        ICS5.97.04.84.03.23.04.5
        LABA0.10.30.50.70.60.60.5
        Cromones0.80.50.10.10.10.10.2
        Montelukast0.00.10.10.10.00.10.1
    Therapy groups, %a
        SABA38.625.729.232.441.939.133.4
        ICS20.724.724.318.715.121.921.3
        SABA+ICS33.243.240.940.436.230.238.1
        Other medicines7.56.55.68.66.88.87.2
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Family Characteristics and Results From the Univariate Analyses

    Family CharacteristicsNo Child With Asthma Medication Within Family (n = 22,456)≥1 Child Within Family With Asthma Prescription (n = 3,081)OR (95% CI)
    CI = confidence interval; ICPC = International Classification for Primary Care; OR = odds ratio; SES = socioeconomic status.
    a Ethnicity based on the country of birth.
    b The highest SES of parent(s) using the International Socio-Economic Index of Occupational Status.
    c At least 1 parent with registered ICPC code for asthma during the study period.
    d Significant values P<.05.
    1 or both parents non-Western cultural background, No. (%)a1,834 (10.6)275 (11.1)1.01 (0.87–1.17)
    Mean SES highest (SD; range)b50.4 (15.5;16–87)49.5 (15.4;16–87)1.00 (0.99–1.00)
    Parental asthma, No. (%)c821 (3.7)256 (8.3)2.33d (1.90–2.85)
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    GP Characteristics and Results From the Univariate Analyses

    GP CharacteristicsGPs Prescribing Asthma Medication Average and Below Average (n = 58)aGPs Prescribing Asthma Medication Above Average (n = 51)aOR (95% CI)
    CI = confidence interval GP = general practitioner; FTE = full-time equivalent; OR = odds ratio.
    a To display the GP characteristics, we divided the GPs into 2 groups: those who prescribed asthma medicaton to the average percentage of children or less, and those who prescribed above average (which, on the GP level, is 7.4%) within their childhood patient population.
    b As classified by Statistics Netherlands on a 5-point scale, in which 1 = high level of urbanizaton and 5 = low urbanization.
    c Full-time or part-time working in number of FTEs.
    d Authorized or required by the Health Authority to provide pharmaceutical services to his/her patients.
    e Total number of patients divided by the number of FTEs per 1,000 patients.
    f Average number of prescriptions issued per patient during 1 year.
    g Significant values P<.05.
    h GPs with 25% or more of their total patient population of children aged 0–17 years.
    Mean age (SD; range), y47.6 (5.7; 36–59)46.2 (6.2; 33–56)1.00 (0.99–1.01)
    Sex, male, No. (%)50 (86.2)37 (72.6)0.83 (0.69–1.00)
    Practice type, solo, No. (%)27 (46.6)20 (39.2)0.88 (0.75–1.02)
    Urban practice location, mean (SD; range)b2.8 (1.4;1–5)3.1 (1.0;1–5)1.03 (0.98–1.10)
    Mean FTE (SD; range)c0.91 (0.15; 0.5–1.0)0.88 (0.17; 0.5–1.0)0.79 (0.48–1.28)
    Dispensing doctor, No. (%)d5 (8.6)3 (5.9)0.97 (0.73–1.29)
    Workload, mean (SD; range)e2.8 (0.7;1.4–5.5)2.6 (0.6;1.3–4.8)0.89 (0.80–1.00)
    Prescribing volume, mean (SD; range)f1.5 (0.5; 0.05–2.7)1.8 (0.5; 0.9–3.2)1.55g (1.38–1.75)
    ≥25% of patients 0–17 y, No. (%)h15 (25.9)6 (11.8)0.77g (0.64–0.93)
    Children with an asthma diagnosis, % (SD; range)3.5 (1.4; 0.8–7.3)5.4 (2.1; 1.9–11.6)1.10g (1.07–1.14)
    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Multilevel Logistic Regression Analyses With 3 Levels: Child, Family, and General Practitioner (GP)

    Explanatory VariablesEmpty Model Intercept (SE)Model 1a Intercept (SE)Model 2a,b Intercept (SE)Model 3a,b Intercept (SE)
    CI = confidence interval; GP = general practitioner; OR = odds ratio; SE = standard error.
    a Model 1 (age-groups), model 2 (age-groups, child characteristics), model 3 (age-groups, child characteristics, family characteristics, GP characteristics).
    b In these models we corrected for the presence of an asthma diagnosis in the child (model 2: OR = 262; 95% CI, 219–312; model 3: OR = 264; 95% CI, 221–315).
    c The variance at the lowest level (children) is not determined because the outcome is dichotomous.
    d Correlation between the variances of the 2 defined age-groups on the GP level.
    e ICC between the 2 upper levels (families and GPs). ICC is the relative contribution of GP to sum of family and GP variance.
    Age 1–17 y−2.580 (0.039)
    Age 1–5 y−2.210 (0.054)−3.629 (0.100)−3.645 (0.091)
    Age 6–17 y−2.779 (0.039)−3.573 (0.071)−3.605 (0.060)
    OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
    Sex, male1.25 (1.13–1.39)1.25 (1.13–1.39)
    Shortness of breath/dyspnea20.7 (14.3–29.9)20.2 (13.9–29.2)
    Wheezing51.5 (24.7–107)49.7 (23.8–104)
    Cough6.51 (5.68–7.47)6.46 (5.64–7.40)
    Acute bronchitis/bronchiolitis9.04 (7.57–10.8)8.91 (7.45–10.6)
    Acute upper respiratory tract infection1.47 (1.26–1.72)1.47 (1.26–1.72)
    Pneumonia2.10 (1.44–3.07)2.11 (1.44–3.09)
    Allergic rhinitis2.12 (1.68–2.69)2.10 (1.66–2.67)
    No. of contacts with GP1.10 (1.08–1.12)1.10 (1.08–1.12)
    Presence of parental asthma1.74 (1.41–2.15)
    Prescribing volume of GP1.99 (1.60–2.47)
    Patients 0–17 y ≥25% per GP0.59 (0.44–0.78)
    Percentage of children with asthma diagnosis per GP0.88 (0.83–0.93)
    Variance (SE)cVariance (SE)Variance (SE)Variance (SE)
    Between-family variance0.567 (0.071)0.535 (0.071)0.474 (0.112)0.471 (0.111)
    Between-GP variance
        Age 1–17 y0.119 (0.022)
        Age 1–5 y0.209 (0.042)0.751 (0.134)0.547 (0.106)
        Age 6–17 y0.097 (0.022)0.384 (0.071)0.214 (0.047)
        Covariance0.118 (0.025)0.479 (0.083)0.284 (0.058)
    CorrelationsCorrelationsCorrelationsCorrelations
    Correlation of GP variance between age-groupsd–0.830.890.83
    Intraclass correlatione
        Age 1–17 y0.17
        Age 1–5 y0.380.720.64
        Age 6–17 y0.290.650.51

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    What Drives Prescribing of Asthma Medication to Children? A Multilevel Population-Based Study

    Mira G. P. Zuidgeest , and colleagues

    Background Asthma in children is a major clinical and public health problem. Because diagnosing and treating the condition is a challenge, there are differences in the prescribing of asthma medication. The aim of this study is to investigate how and to what degree patient, family, and doctor characteristics influence the prescribing of asthma medication in children.

    What This Study Found The patient, family, and doctor have a significant influence on prescribing asthma medication in children. Prescribing is strongly related to children's asthma and symptoms and to other respiratory diseases, such as bronchitis. The presence of asthma in the parents is also associated with prescribing asthma medication to children. In addition, in this study, every extra family contact with the doctor led to a 10% extra chance of receiving asthma medication. There is more variation between doctors in prescribing for children younger than the age of 6 years compared with older children. This may be due to the complexities in diagnosing asthma in young children.

    Implications

    • Uncertainties in diagnosing asthma may result in more prescribing that is influenced by family and doctors.
    • Despite the ongoing search for better ways to diagnose asthma in children, there is still a diagnostic gap, especially in preschool children. This gap contributes to differences between doctors in prescribing asthma medication, based on personal preferences and general attitudes toward prescribing.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (1)
Vol. 7, Issue 1
1 Jan 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What Drives Prescribing of Asthma Medication to Children? A Multilevel Population-Based Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
What Drives Prescribing of Asthma Medication to Children? A Multilevel Population-Based Study
Mira G. P. Zuidgeest, Liset van Dijk, Peter Spreeuwenberg, Henriëtte A. Smit, Bert Brunekreef, Hubertus G. M. Arets, Madelon Bracke, Hubert G. M. Leufkens
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2009, 7 (1) 32-40; DOI: 10.1370/afm.910

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
What Drives Prescribing of Asthma Medication to Children? A Multilevel Population-Based Study
Mira G. P. Zuidgeest, Liset van Dijk, Peter Spreeuwenberg, Henriëtte A. Smit, Bert Brunekreef, Hubertus G. M. Arets, Madelon Bracke, Hubert G. M. Leufkens
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2009, 7 (1) 32-40; DOI: 10.1370/afm.910
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Way Forward for Health Care and Healers
  • Implementation Insights
  • The Complexity of and Opportunity for Screening in Primary Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family-Based Interventions to Promote Weight Management in Adults: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India
  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
  • Person groups:
    • Children's health
    • Community / population health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Professional practice

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine