Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Patient Error: A Preliminary Taxonomy

Stephen Buetow, Liz Kiata, Tess Liew, Tim Kenealy, Susan Dovey and Glyn Elwyn
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2009, 7 (3) 223-231; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.941
Stephen Buetow
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liz Kiata
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tess Liew
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tim Kenealy
PhD, MBChB
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Dovey
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Glyn Elwyn
MBBCh, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Number and Age Distribution of Participants in Nominal Groups

    GroupNo.Female No.Age <20 y No.Age 20–54 y No.Age ≥55 y No.
    Patient groups
    1. English as a second language97054
    2. High health literacy55050
    3. Independent elders84026
    4. Informal carergivers88071
    5. Men90054
    6. Māori88152
    7. Teenagers85800
    8. Women99072
    Total644693619
    Professional groups
    9. Family physicians51041
    10. Practice nurses77043
    11. Pharmacists72043
    Total19100127
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Taxonomy of Patient Error

    Examplesa
    Level 1Level 2Level 3Type of ErrorParticipant Comment
    a Groups are numbered according to Table 1.
    Action errors
    1. Attendance errors1.1 Underattendance1.1.1 NonattendanceRefusal of visits“If it runs through the family we seek no help” (group 2)
    1.1.2 Insufficient attendanceLess frequent attendance than recommended“(Not) following your gut instinct and not seeking a second opinion” (group 8)
    1.2 Untimely attendance1.2.1 Early attendanceAttendance for self-limiting conditions“Hypochondriacal behavior” (group 5)
    1.2.2 Late attendanceDeferral of visit“Delay in visiting the doctor when you know you’re sick” (group 2)
    1.3 Overattendance1.3.1 Frequent attendanceMore frequent attendance than required“Overattendance (eg, because the doctor is cute)” (group 2)
    1.4 Misattendance1.4.1 Inappropriate type of visitDemand for a home visit by a patient who could have safely come to the clinicIrregularity (group 2)
    1.4.2 No usual provider chosenFrequently changing providers“Consulting multiple doctors” (group 9)
    1.4.3 Use of unqualified sourcesUse of unqualified complementary sourcesTaking advice from marginal sources: “over the fence, nonqualified practitioners, TV adverts” (group 9)
    1.4.4. Refusals during visitsRefusal to be examined by a student doctor“Refusing to be checked by the doctor” (group 1)
    1.4.5 No escort when neededNo interpreter“Not coming in with an interpreter (friend/relative) when their communication in English is suboptimal” (group 9)
    1.4.6 Inappropriate escort/chaperoneChild“Not telling doctor what their real concerns are” (group 9)
    2. Assertion errors2.1 Taciturnity2.1.1 Nondisclosure of relevant informationNot updating contact information“Not telling the doctor all your symptoms” (group 7)
    2.1.2 NonquestioningNot asking for clarification of confusing information“Not questioning professionals if instructions are unclear or they do not understand” (group 10)
    2.2 Verbosity2.2.1 Excessive talkNot giving the clinician sufficient time to meet concerns“Telling doctor what I want but not giving much time for him to tell me what he would like” (group 3)
    2.3 Extraneous talk2.3.1 Irrelevant talkTrying too hard to recall details“No relationship with doctor, so just say ’yes‘ to everything” (group 1)
    2.4 Erroneous talk2.4.1 Inaccurate talkContradicting medical advice to family or friends“Inaccurate/false responses” (group 2)
    2.5 Inarticulateness2.5.1 Inability to express thoughts clearlyLimited language skills; translation errors.Inability to describe your sickness” (group 7)
    2.6 Disrespect2.6.1 Lack of caringLack of regard for interests of clinician“Making 1 appointment for 2 to 4 people” (group 10)
    2.6.2 DiscourtesyCell phone on during visits“Not notifying if late or, need to miss, appointments” (group 10)
    2.6.3 AbusivenessViolent patient“Being drunk and abusive” (group 6)
    2.7 Artfulness2.7.1 DishonestyDistortion of information given“Lying about symptoms to jump queue” (group 4)
    2.7.2 Pretense of sicknessBenefits of sick role“Pretending to be ill to take the day off school” (group 7)
    2.7.3 Manipulation of systemFalse claims for compensation“Seeks to manipulate the outflow of information from the medical record” (group 9)
    3. Adherence errors3.1 Collection errors3.1.1 Prescriptions not redeemedPrescribed medications not collected from pharmacies“Only getting medications they can afford for now” (group 10)
    3.2 Storage errors3.2.1 Storage errorsStorage of medications past expiration date“Accumulating discontinued medications” (group 9)
    3.3 Self-administration3.3.1 No treatmentFailure to take recommended treatment“Running out of medications” (group 10)
    3.3.2 Wrong treatmentTaking discontinued treatment“Using old medication” (group 6)
    3.3.3 Dosage errorsExcessive dosage“Doubling up treatment if going away” (group 3)
    3.3.4 Timing errorsTaking medication at incorrect times“Taking medication in wrong order” (group 11)
    3.3.5 Duration errorsTreatment duration is shorter than recommended“Stopping too soon” (group 11)
    3.3.6 Hazardous interactionsInteractions of over-the-counter and prescribed treatments“Mixing pills and alcohol” (group 6)
    3.4 Other delivery errors3.4.1 Sharing of medicationSharing medication with family or friends“Sharing resources with relatives, eg, ‘rescue’ asthma inhalers” (group 10)
    Mental errors: proximate determinants
    4. Memory errors4.1 Memory lapses4.1.1 ForgetfulnessForgetting to take medication“Forgetting to collect the medication” (group 11)
    4.1.2 Misrecalling informationMisrecalling when to attend for care“Turn up at wrong time” (group 1)
    5. Mindfulness errors5.1 Inattention5.1.1 Failure to noticeNot perceiving“Not listening to what the doctor says” (group 8)
    5.1.2 Recognize incorrectlyMisreading of symptoms“Over-reacting to children’s symptoms” (group 4)
    5.2 Overattentiveness5.2.1 HypervigilanceOverattentiveness to variations in normal function“Hyperchondriacal behavior” (group 5)
    6. Misjudgments6.1 Assessment errors6.1.1 Failure to checkFailure to check on laboratory results“Not checking pills from chemist” (group 3)
    6.1.2 Failure to monitorFailure to monitor weight“Not monitoring blood glucose as recommended” (group 10)
    6.1.3 Failure to recordFailure to keep a patient diary when requested“Not recording symptoms when asked, or bringing record back as asked” (group 9)
    6.1.4 Wrong assessmentMisreading of instructions“Stopping medication just because you feel better” (group 1)
    6.2 Unrealistic expectations6.2.1 Overexpectation of othersImmediate cure“Expecting the doctor to read their mind” (group 9)
    6.2.2 Overexpectation of selfSelf-diagnosis“Using the Internet for self-diagnosis and self-treatment” (group 10)
    6.2.3 Underexpectation of othersExpected inability of clinician to help“Having no faith in doctors” (group 8)
    6.2.4 Underexpectation of selfExpected inability of self to cope or share responsibilities“Inability to cope with new presentations” (group 11)
    Memory errors: background determinants
    7. Knowledge deficits7.1 Knowledge errors7.1.1 Low literacyPoor language skills“Inability to read and understand instructions” (group 1)
    7.1.2 Low health literacyNot knowing the name of medications“Confusion over brand, shape, color and name (especially when these change” (group 11)
    7.1.3 Low numeracyInability to budget“Not budgeting and not having an emergency fund for medical care” (group 8)
    7.2 Comprehension errors7.2.1 Lack of understandingFailure to understand instructions“Not understanding instructions (eg, re: casts, equipment)” (group 10)
    7.3 Logic errors7.3.1 Reasoning errorsConsidering that a medication imparts absolute protection“Assuming that must be OK because feeling good” (group 2)
    8. Attitudes not conducive to health8.1 Selfishness8.3.1 Excessive prideReluctance to ask for, or accept help“Reluctance to ask for help (eg, credit) because of pride” (group 8)
    8.3.2 DishonestyLying“Lying about symptoms to jump queue” (group 4)
    8.3.3 Self-pityFeeling a victim“Feeling self-pity; becoming a victim” (group 1)
    8.3.4 HedonismWillingness to drink alcohol inappropriately“Taking medicines for recreational use (eg, too much insulin to get a high)” (group 11)
    8.2 Self-neglect8.2.1 Excessive selflessnessCarriage of other people’s burdens“Putting other people’s needs first” (group 2)
    8.2.2 Lack of self-regardShyness at visits“Forget to love oneself; putting other people before yourself” (group 4)
    8.2.3 CarelessnessCarelessness“Losing instructions” (group 2)
    8.2.4 EmbarrassmentShame“Not taking medications because you think your friends might mock you” (group 7)
    8.3 Carelessness8.4.1 InattentionDistractedness or absent-mindedness“Patient distracted—not engaging in the consultation” (group 10)
    8.4.2 Thoughtlessness regarding othersSharing food and drink while infectious“Not staying home when feeling sick (so spreading influenza)” (group 8)
    8.4.3 Excessive risk taking“She’ll be OK” attitude“Taking risks with your health when sick” (group 5)
    8.4.4 ApathyLaziness in getting medication“Noncollection of medicines because of sloth” (group 11)
    8.4.5 UnreliabilityInconsistency in passing on messages“Inconsistent with medication” (group 3)
    8.5 Distrust8.5.1 DisbeliefSuspicion of health professionals“Not believing the doctor” (group 2)
    8.5.2 FearfulnessFear of needles“Staying with an unhelpful doctor because of familiarity and fear of change” (group 1)
    8.5.3 UncooperativenessUnwillingness to negotiate“Refusing to be checked by the doctor” (group 1)
    8.5.4 PessimismFeeling of helplessness“Giving up hope” (group 1)
    8.6 Anger8.6.1 ImpatienceImpatience while waiting for care“Not having patience while waiting” (group 6)
    8.6.2 IntolerancePrejudice against doctors with non-English speaking backgrounds“Stressing out on things that you have forgotten to do” (group 4)
    8.7 Other priorities8.7.1 Cultural prioritiesMourning takes priority over medication adherence“Tangi [funeral] disrupts medical/health needs” (group 3)

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Patient Error: A Preliminary Taxonomy

    Stephen Buetow , and colleagues

    Background Most research of medical errors focuses on clinicians and systems. This study proposes a method to account for patients' role in medical errors.

    What This Study Found Researchers have developed a three-level system which includes 70 possible types of errors patients might make, alone or with others. Two main groups are action errors, which result from patient behavior, and mental errors, or errors in thought processes.

    Implications

    • This classification system is the first that describes how patients can influence medical errors. Further research, using a variety of methods, is needed to understand more about patient contributions to errors.
    • Errors are often not created by patients, clinicians, or systems alone, but rather through interactions between these groups. Future work on medical errors should recognize this interdependence.
  • Correction to Table 2

    An error was made in Table 2. Taxonomy of Patient Error in which the entry for Mental errors: background determinants was inadvertently labeled Memory errors: background determinants. A corrected, revised Table 2 is available below.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Corrected Table - PDF file, 3 pages, 474 KB
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (3)
Vol. 7, Issue 3
1 May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patient Error: A Preliminary Taxonomy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Patient Error: A Preliminary Taxonomy
Stephen Buetow, Liz Kiata, Tess Liew, Tim Kenealy, Susan Dovey, Glyn Elwyn
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2009, 7 (3) 223-231; DOI: 10.1370/afm.941

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Patient Error: A Preliminary Taxonomy
Stephen Buetow, Liz Kiata, Tess Liew, Tim Kenealy, Susan Dovey, Glyn Elwyn
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2009, 7 (3) 223-231; DOI: 10.1370/afm.941
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • CORRECTION
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Filling a gap in safety metrics: development of a patient-centred framework to identify and categorise patient-reported breakdowns related to the diagnostic process in ambulatory care
  • A cross-sectional mixed methods study protocol to generate learning from patient safety incidents reported from general practice
  • What attributes of patients affect their involvement in safety? A key opinion leaders' perspective
  • 'Tempos' management in primary care: a key factor for classifying adverse events, and improving quality and safety
  • 'Tempos' management in primary care: a key factor for classifying adverse events, and improving quality and safety
  • Understanding Patients' Experiences of Treatment Burden in Chronic Heart Failure Using Normalization Process Theory
  • In This Issue: The Science, Art, and Policy of Primary Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Proactive Deprescribing Among Older Adults With Polypharmacy: Barriers and Enablers
  • Artificial Intelligence Tools for Preconception Cardiomyopathy Screening Among Women of Reproductive Age
  • Family Physicians in Focused Practice in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Level Study of Trends From 1993/1994 Through 2021/2022
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Qualitative methods

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine