Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleTheory

Reconceptualizing the Experience of Surrogate Decision Making: Reports vs Genuine Decisions

Ursula K. Braun, Aanand D. Naik and Laurence B. McCullough
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2009, 7 (3) 249-253; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.963
Ursula K. Braun
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aanand D. Naik
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurence B. McCullough
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Reconceptualizing the experience of surrogate decision making.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Surrogate Report and Surrogate Decision

    Surrogate PositionExample
    Surrogate reportMr H had amyotrophic lateral sclerosis diagnosed 7 years ago. Over the years he has declared multiple times that he does not want to be kept alive on a ventilator. He had considerable decline in the last year and continued to refuse ventilator support. When he goes into respiratory distress, he is asked again about his wishes and confirms. When he becomes severely hypoxic and delirious despite oxygen by mask, the physician turns to his wife as his surrogate. His wife honors her husband’s wishes saying: “He told me many times that he never wants to be on a ventilator, and I am carrying out his wishes.”
    Surrogate decisionMrs F has severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and has recently been given a diagnosis of stage-4 lung cancer that has metastasized to the liver. She has no advance directives, and her husband never had conversations with her regarding medical care. When she is admitted with obstructive pneumonia, she is intubated and requires ventilatory support. After 10 days she has not improved. She has suffered a non- Q wave myocardial infarction and a small cerebrovascular infarct, and she has developed acute renal failure during the hospital course. Her husband is asked to decide whether to do a tracheostomy or to treat her with comfort measures and stop ventilatory support. He asks that everything be done while he comes to terms with his wife’s death.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Reconceptualizing the Experience of Surrogate Decision Making: Reports vs Genuine Decisions

    Laurence B. McCullough , and colleagues

    Background When patients are no longer able to make decisions about their life-sustaining treatment, family members or legal representatives must serve as surrogate decision makers. Their decisions are based on substituted judgment (the patient's values and preferences) or, if such values aren't known, they are based on what is in the patient's best interest. In this article, the authors reexamine this decision-making model to better reflect the experience of making surrogate decisions.

    What This Study Found The authors propose that the current model of surrogate decision making be replaced by a new model. The new model distinguishes between making decisions for the patient, which is necessary when patient preferences are not known, and making reports on the patient's behalf when preferences are known. Making reports carries less stress and anguish than actual surrogate decision making.

    Implications

    • The concept of surrogate decision making should be used only when actual decision making is needed. Clinicians should help patients distinguish between making reports and making decisions.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (3)
Vol. 7, Issue 3
1 May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reconceptualizing the Experience of Surrogate Decision Making: Reports vs Genuine Decisions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Reconceptualizing the Experience of Surrogate Decision Making: Reports vs Genuine Decisions
Ursula K. Braun, Aanand D. Naik, Laurence B. McCullough
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2009, 7 (3) 249-253; DOI: 10.1370/afm.963

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Reconceptualizing the Experience of Surrogate Decision Making: Reports vs Genuine Decisions
Ursula K. Braun, Aanand D. Naik, Laurence B. McCullough
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2009, 7 (3) 249-253; DOI: 10.1370/afm.963
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • ETHICAL AND CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS
    • SURROGATE REPORTS
    • GENUINE SURROGATE DECISIONS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A qualitative investigation of selecting surrogate decision-makers
  • Preventing Life-Sustaining Treatment by Default
  • In This Issue: The Science, Art, and Policy of Primary Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Adherence Labeling: Understanding the Origins, Limitations, and Ethical Challenges of “Diagnosing” Nonadherence
  • Unhurried Conversations in Health Care Are More Important Than Ever: Identifying Key Communication Practices for Careful and Kind Care
  • Refining Vendor-Defined Measures to Accurately Quantify EHR Workload Outside Time Scheduled With Patients
Show more Theory

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Qualitative methods
  • Other topics:
    • Ethics
    • Communication / decision making

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine