Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Family Physician Involvement in Cancer Care Follow-up: The Experience of a Cohort of Patients With Lung Cancer

Michèle Aubin, Lucie Vézina, René Verreault, Lise Fillion, Éveline Hudon, François Lehmann, Yvan Leduc, Rénald Bergeron, Daniel Reinharz and Diane Morin
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2010, 8 (6) 526-532; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1171
Michèle Aubin
MD, PhD, CCFP, FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucie Vézina
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
René Verreault
MD, PhD, FCFP, CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lise Fillion
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Éveline Hudon
MD, MSc, CCFP, FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
François Lehmann
MD, CCFP, FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yvan Leduc
MD, PhD, CCFP, FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rénald Bergeron
MD, CCFP, FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Reinharz
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diane Morin
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Patient participation in the study.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Patient Characteristics at Baseline (N=395)

    CharacteristicNo. (%) or Mean ± SD (Range) [Median]
    Sex
        Female170 (43.0)
        Male225 (57.0)
    Functional status
        Normal activity178 (45.1)
        Symptoms but ambulatory150 (37.9)
        Confined to bed or chair <50% of waking hours44 (11.1)
        Confined to bed or chair ≥50% of waking hours20 (5.1)
        Completely disabled—100% bedridden3 (0.8)
    Type of lung cancer
        Squamous cell carcinoma77 (19.5)
        Adenomatous carcinoma164 (41.5)
        Other non–small cell carcinoma67 (17.0)
        Small cell carcinoma58 (14.7)
        Unknown29 (7.3)
    Treatment
        Surgery with/without chemotherapy/radiation therapy113 (28.6)
        Chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy254 (64.3)
        No treatment28 (7.1)
    Metastases
        Present at baseline128 (32.4)
        Found during follow-up37 (9.4)
        None230 (58.2)
    Cancer stage
        Stage I56 (14.2)
        Stage II33 (8.3)
        Stage III119 (30.1)
        Stage IV133 (33.7)
        Not confirmed54 (13.7)
    Age, years63.4 ± 9.5 (31–88) [64]
    Education, years10.9 ± 3.9 (2–24) [11]
    Intervals in care
        Investigation to diagnosis, weeks5.6 ± 8.0 (0–78) [3]
        Diagnosis to first treatment, days29.0 ± 26.6 (0–140) [21]
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Extent of Family Physician Involvement by Cancer Phase

    Extent of InvolvementN (% of Patients)PValuea
    a From the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test; compares, across cancer phases, the proportion of patients who reported each extent of family physician involvement.
    b Only for patients who had treatment.
    c This question was not asked at the diagnosis phase; often, treatment had already begun at the baseline interview.
    Contact with family physician
        Diagnosis364 (58.8)<.001
        Primary treatment108 (60.2)
        Stability228 (88.2)
        Progression/relapse48 (75.0)
        Advanced/terminal37 (67.6)
    If contact with family physician, discussion about visits to oncologist
        Diagnosis214 (72.9).09
        Primary treatment65 (77.8)
        Stability197 (79.7)
        Progression/relapse36 (91.7)
        Advanced/terminal22 (83.3)
    Questions to ask of family physician in relation to cancer
        Diagnosis214 (32.7)<.001
        Primary treatment65 (43.1)
        Stability201 (44.3)
        Progression/relapse36 (50.0)
        Advanced/terminal25 (64.0)
    Family physician involvement in treatment decisionsb
        Diagnosisc–<.001
        Primary treatment53 (15.1)
        Stability107 (16.8)
        Progression/relapse34 (20.6)
        Advanced/terminal13 (53.9)
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Family Physician Involvement in Various Aspects of Care by Cancer Phase

    Aspect of CareActual Involvement N (% of Patients)Expected Involvement N (% of Patients)PValuea
    a From the χ2 test; compares, at each cancer phase, the actual vs expected proportions for family physician involvement in specific aspects of cancer care, as reported by patients.
    Coordination of care
        Diagnosis357 (41.2)362 (83.4)<.001
        Primary treatment102 (24.5)107 (83.2)<.001
        Stability227 (31.3)228 (85.1)<.001
        Progression/ relapse46 (37.0)48 (75.0)<.001
        Advanced/terminal37 (46.0)37 (86.5)<.001
    Emotional support
        Diagnosis351 (36.8)362 (83.4)<.001
        Primary treatment104 (44.2)107 (86.9)<.001
        Stability227 (54.6)228 (88.2)<.001
        Progression/relapse46 (60.9)48 (87.5).002
        Advanced/terminal37 (51.4)37 (81.1).007
    Transmission of information
        Diagnosis352 (17.3)362 (62.0)<.001
        Primary treatment103 (18.4)107 (59.8)<.001
        Stability227 (29.1)228 (72.4)<.001
        Progression/ relapse46 (34.8)48 (58.3).01
        Advanced/terminal37 (37.8)37 (73.0).002
    Symptom relief
        Diagnosis332 (13.0)361 (62.3)<.001
        Primary treatment100 (19.0)107 (74.8)<.001
        Stability225 (30.2)228 (79.8)<.001
        Progression/relapse46 (30.4)48 (72.9)<.001
        Advanced/terminal37 (43.2)37 (78.4).002
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Family Physician Pattern of Care by Cancer Phase

    Cancer Phase
    Pattern of CareDiagnosis (N=395)Primary Treatment (n=118)Stability (n=238)Progression/Relapse (n=50)Advanced/Terminal (n=39)PValuea
    Note: Values are percentages of patients.
    a From the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test; compares variation of each family physician pattern of care across cancer phases.
    No family physician7.88.54.24.05.1.31
    Sequential11.612.73.82.018.0<.001
    Parallel64.654.255.962.023.1<.001
    Shared16.024.636.132.053.8<.001
    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Patient Visits to Their Family Physician by Cancer Phase and Pattern of Carea

    Pattern of Care
    Cancer PhaseNo Family PhysicianSequentialParallelShared CarePValueb
    Note: Values are mean ± standard deviation number of visits.
    a Values should not be compared from one cancer phase to another since duration of each phase was not equivalent.
    b From analysis of variance; compares, at each cancer phase, the mean number of visits to the family physician according to family physician patterns of care.
    Primary treatment–0.000.89 ± 1.382.25 ± 1.73<.001
    Stability–0.001.28 ± 1.262.54 ± 2.52<.001
    Progression/relapse–0.72 ± 0.001.33 ± 1.483.21 ± 3.27.02
    Advanced/terminal–0.67 ± 0.821.20 ± 1.812.37 ± 1.30.02

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Family Physician Involvement in Cancer Care Follow-Up: The Experience of a Cohort of Patients With Lung Cancer

    Mich�le Aubin , and colleagues

    Background Cancer patients often experience fragmented care, as they consult a variety of health professionals in multiple settings. This study of 395 patients with lung cancer in the province of Quebec, Canada, describes the expected and actual roles of family physicians during different phases of cancer care and follow-up.

    What This Study Found Fewer than one-half of patients reported a high degree of family physician involvement in most aspects of cancer care throughout the cancer care trajectory. A majority of patients (more than 90 percent) identified the oncology team or oncologists as mainly responsible for their cancer care, except in the advanced/terminal phase, where a majority (70 percent) attributed this role to their family physician. Immediately following diagnosis, only 15 percent of patients perceived a shared care pattern between their family physician and oncologists, but this proportion increased with cancer progression. Most patients would have liked their family physician to be more involved in all aspects of cancer care.

    Implications

    • The authors call for better communication and collaboration between family physicians and the oncology team to facilitate shared care in cancer follow-up.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 8 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 8 (6)
Vol. 8, Issue 6
1 Nov 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Annual Indexes
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Family Physician Involvement in Cancer Care Follow-up: The Experience of a Cohort of Patients With Lung Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Family Physician Involvement in Cancer Care Follow-up: The Experience of a Cohort of Patients With Lung Cancer
Michèle Aubin, Lucie Vézina, René Verreault, Lise Fillion, Éveline Hudon, François Lehmann, Yvan Leduc, Rénald Bergeron, Daniel Reinharz, Diane Morin
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2010, 8 (6) 526-532; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1171

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Family Physician Involvement in Cancer Care Follow-up: The Experience of a Cohort of Patients With Lung Cancer
Michèle Aubin, Lucie Vézina, René Verreault, Lise Fillion, Éveline Hudon, François Lehmann, Yvan Leduc, Rénald Bergeron, Daniel Reinharz, Diane Morin
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2010, 8 (6) 526-532; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1171
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Physician continuity of care in the last year of life in community-dwelling adults: retrospective population-based study
  • Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review
  • Intensity of outpatient physician care in the last year of life: a population-based retrospective descriptive study
  • Continuity of Cancer Care and Collaboration Between Family Physicians and Oncologists: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
  • Continuity of care in general practice at cancer diagnosis (COOC-GP study): a national cohort study of 2853 patients
  • The reality of urban FPs
  • Les besoins des patients avec un cancer en soins palliatifs lors des visites medicales: Une etude qualitative
  • Needs of cancer patients in palliative care during medical visits: Qualitative study
  • Ultimate journey of the terminally ill: Ways and pathways of hope
  • The Family Physician's Perceived Role in Preventing and Guiding Hospital Admissions at the End of Life: A Focus Group Study
  • Barriers to Breast and Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care: Perceptions of Primary Care Physicians and Medical Oncologists in the United States
  • Adult Cancer Survivors Discuss Follow-up in Primary Care: 'Not What I Want, But Maybe What I Need'
  • In This Issue: Access, Vulnerability, and Science
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family-Based Interventions to Promote Weight Management in Adults: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India
  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine