Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Healthy Steps Trial: Pedometer-Based Advice and Physical Activity for Low-Active Older Adults

Gregory S. Kolt, Grant M. Schofield, Ngaire Kerse, Nicholas Garrett, Toni Ashton and Asmita Patel
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2012, 10 (3) 206-212; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1345
Gregory S. Kolt
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: g.kolt@uws.edu.au
Grant M. Schofield
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ngaire Kerse
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas Garrett
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Toni Ashton
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Asmita Patel
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Flow of participants through each stage of the Healthy Steps trial.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Patient Characteristics at Baseline (N = 330)

    CharacteristicStandard Green Prescription Group (n=165)Pedometer-Based Green Prescription Group (n=165)P Valuea
    Age, mean (SD), y73.9 (5.9)74.3 (6.2).62
    Couples, No.1615–
    Female, No. (%)92 (55.8)86 (52.1).51
    New Zealand European, No. (%)162 (98.2)158 (95.8).10
    Married or living with partner, No. (%)101 (61.2)108 (65.5).42
    Education, No. (%)
     No qualification43 (26.1)42 (25.4).89
     High school qualification33 (20.0)30 (18.2)
     Post–high school qualification89 (53.9)93 (56.4)
    Retired, No. (%)129 (78.2)130 (80.3).65
    Clinic, No. (%).44
     Clinic 162 (37.6)64 (38.8)
     Clinic 26 (3.6)13 (7.9)
     Clinic 325 (15.2)23 (13.9)
     Clinic 46 (3.6)5 (3.0)
     Clinic 57 (4.2)5 (3.0)
     Clinic 611 (6.7)13 (7.9)
     Clinic 724 (14.6)14 (8.5)
     Clinic 812 (7.3)8 (4.9)
     Clinic 92 (1.2)5 (3.0)
     Clinic 1010 (6.1)15 (9.1)
    Taking medications for heart conditions/ hypertension, No. (%)66 (40.0)75 (34.4).32
    Own and use an auto-mobile, No. (%)148 (89.7)156 (94.6).10
    • ↵a The test was a t test for age and a χ2 test for other characteristics.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Measures of Physical Activity and Other Outcomes by Group and Time Point

    Time Point, Adjusted Mean (95% CI)P Value
    MeasureGroupaBaseline3 Months12 MonthsTimeGroupTime × Group
    Leisure activity, min/wk
     TotalbS92.5 (74.6–114.8)146.3 (120.2–178.0)147.1 (115.0–188.3)<.001.78.13
    P80.6 (63.6–102.0)168.9 (139.4–204.8)160.4 (125.1–205.6)
     ModeratebS69.9 (53.8–90.8)111.4 (88.2–127.3)99.4 (76.0–130.1)<.001.98.16
    P56.4 (43.4–75.5)121.2 (93.6–157.0)114.2 (87.4–149.3)
     WalkingbS61.3 (47.2–79.6)92.2 (73.4–116.0)89.4 (64.5–123.9)<.001.70.03
    P43.4 (32.7–57.7)107.4 (82.7–139.4)94.0 (72.0–122.7)
    Total walking activity,b min/wkS81.5 (64.2–103.6)106.1 (87.4–129.0)143.0 (114.0–179.3)<.001.27.12
    P57.0 (44.3–73.3)109.9 (87.9–137.6)139.0 (112.0–172.5)
    BMI, kg/m2S26.4 (25.7–27.2)26.3 (25.6–27.0)26.4 (25.6–27.1).06.13.11
    P27.2 (26.4–28.0)27.2 (26.3–28.0)27.0 (26.2–27.8)
    Blood pressure, mm Hg
     SystolicS145.8 (140.4–151.3)133.4 (128.6–138.1)136.7 (132.0–141.4)<.001.41.98
    P144.2 (138.6–149.9)131.9 (127.1–136.7)134.8 (130.1–139.5)
     DiastolicS82.4 (79.6–85.3)76.8 (74.3–79.4)78.8 (76.2–81.4)<.001.73.55
    P83.5 (80.5–86.5)77.4 (75.0–79.9)78.3 (75.8–80.8)
    Short Physical Performance BatteryS8.5 (8.1–9.0)8.5 (8.0–9.0)8.5 (8.0–9.0).25.97.17
    P8.3 (7.8–8.8)8.3 (7.8–8.8)8.8 (8.4–9.3)
    SF-36 scale
     Physical functioningS73.1 (69.5–76.7)76.1 (72.6–79.6)78.4 (74.8–81.9)<.001.22.83
    P71.2 (67.4–75.1)73.7 (70.1–77.3)75.3 (71.7–79.0)
     General healthS72.6 (69.8–75.4)77.1 (74.3–79.8)80.1 (77.5–82.7)<.001.93.19
    P73.9 (71.0–76.9)76.7 (73.9–79.4)78.7 (75.9–81.6)
     VitalityS64.7 (61.8–67.7)66.8 (63.8–69.7)70.6 (67.8–73.4)<.001.85.66
    P64.4 (61.1–67.6)68.0 (65.0–71.0)70.6 (67.8–73.3)
     Mental healthS82.7 (80.5–84.9)85.4 (83.3–87.4)87.0 (85.2–88.7)<.001.50.93
    P82.2 (79.6–84.8)84.7 (82.4–86.9)86.0 (83.8–88.1)
    • BMI = body mass index; SF-36 = the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey.

    • Notes: Repeated measures Generalized Estimating Equation model adjusted for age, sex, partner, education, occurrence of health or other events since baseline, and clustered by physician and couple. Blood pressure also adjusted for medications and change in medications for heart conditions or hypertension. The Short Physical Performance Battery scores range from 0 to 12; higher score indicates better function. The SF-36 scales scores range from 0 to 100; higher score indicates better health-related quality of life.

    • ↵a S = standard Green Prescription group; P = pedometer-based Green Prescription group.

    • ↵b The 4 measures of physical activity are nonexclusive.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Gregory S. Kolt , and colleagues

    Background In New Zealand, the Green Prescription is a nationally supported intervention to increase physical activity, encouraging participants to take part in 30 minutes of moderate activity per day. This study compares the effectiveness of a pedometer-based Green Prescription with the current time-based program.

    What This Study Found A recommendation for physical activity with pedometer monitoring results in a greater increase in leisure walking among older adults than a Green Prescription that relies only on time-based goals. Among 330 older adults with low levels of physical activity, leisure walking increased by 50 minutes a week among the pedometer-based Green Prescription group compared with 28 minutes a week among the standard Green Prescription group. For both groups, there were significant increases in physical activity that were largely maintained throughout the 12-month study period. Body mass index did not change in either group, but significant improvements in blood pressure were observed for both groups.

    Implications

    • Pedometers may improve the efficacy of the activity prescription by providing regular objective monitoring and feedback to assist motivation.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 10 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 10 (3)
Vol. 10, Issue 3
May/June 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Healthy Steps Trial: Pedometer-Based Advice and Physical Activity for Low-Active Older Adults
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Healthy Steps Trial: Pedometer-Based Advice and Physical Activity for Low-Active Older Adults
Gregory S. Kolt, Grant M. Schofield, Ngaire Kerse, Nicholas Garrett, Toni Ashton, Asmita Patel
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2012, 10 (3) 206-212; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1345

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Healthy Steps Trial: Pedometer-Based Advice and Physical Activity for Low-Active Older Adults
Gregory S. Kolt, Grant M. Schofield, Ngaire Kerse, Nicholas Garrett, Toni Ashton, Asmita Patel
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2012, 10 (3) 206-212; DOI: 10.1370/afm.1345
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: findings from the WALK 2.0 randomised controlled trial
  • Measurement of physical activity in older adult interventions: a systematic review
  • Impact of a 12-week, pharmacist-directed walking program in an established employee preventive care clinic
  • In This Issue: From Communities of Solution to Joy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Performance-Based Reimbursement, Illegitimate Tasks, Moral Distress, and Quality Care in Primary Care: A Mediation Model of Longitudinal Data
  • Adverse Outcomes Associated With Inhaled Corticosteroid Use in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Family-Based Interventions to Promote Weight Management in Adults: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
    • Prevention
    • Health promotion
  • Person groups:
    • Older adults
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine