Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Differences in Diabetes Care With and Without Certification as a Medical Home

Leif I. Solberg, Caroline Carlin, Kevin A. Peterson and Milton Eder
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2020, 18 (1) 66-72; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2492
Leif I. Solberg
1HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Leif.I.Solberg@HealthPartners.com
Caroline Carlin
2University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin A. Peterson
2University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Milton Eder
2University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Complex care: Figuring out what works and for which patients
    Peter F. Cronholm (1,2,3)
    Published on: 08 April 2020
  • Re:Medical Home Improves Diabetes Care - Key Ingredient is Care Management
    Robert Watkins
    Published on: 12 February 2020
  • Medical Home Improves Diabetes Care - Key Ingredient is Care Management
    Robert A. Gabbay
    Published on: 29 January 2020
  • Published on: (8 April 2020)
    Page navigation anchor for Complex care: Figuring out what works and for which patients
    Complex care: Figuring out what works and for which patients
    • Peter F. Cronholm (1,2,3), Associate Professor
    • Other Contributors:

    We appreciate the efforts of Solberg et al. to better understand what components of healthcare systems meaningfully improve health outcomes for patients with conditions like diabetes which are often strongly shaped by social and behavioral factors. Consideration of the study results and discussion prompts numerous points of reflection which inform our understanding and deserve comment. It was not surprising to these authors...

    Show More

    We appreciate the efforts of Solberg et al. to better understand what components of healthcare systems meaningfully improve health outcomes for patients with conditions like diabetes which are often strongly shaped by social and behavioral factors. Consideration of the study results and discussion prompts numerous points of reflection which inform our understanding and deserve comment. It was not surprising to these authors that that the findings showed small changes in outcomes associated with incremental medical home infrastructure. The medical home model, while aspiring to bring about transformational change to primary care, has been fundamentally encumbered from its inception with care processes that are anchored in traditional models such that clinical teams are required to sustain all of the previous tasks of antiquated care models while "tacking on" medical home quality efforts. The needed alterative to this approach is a fundamental reimaging and redesign of care processes to truly achieve the quadruple aim, expanding the traditional triple aim of improved care to also include clinical team satisfaction/sustainability. The necessary redesign would map deliverables and workflows onto novel staffing models and leverage the tools of population health to supply data and identify need in a timely manner. While the spirit of the PCMH aligns with this need, little has changed in terms of daily operations and role advancement in most practices compounded by the lag between payment models and meaningful service transformation.

    Another recent publication detailing the results of a randomized control trial (RCT) of a different transformational model of care redesign highlights the need for rigorous methodologies to evaluate the ultimate impact of systemic changes aimed at improved outcomes. In addition to the need for RCT-level evidence of outcomes, the results of Solberg's medical home study and the Camden Coalition RCT both suggest to us the need for a broader array of outcome measures to assess how changes in healthcare paradigms are creating value for patients and other stakeholders. Meaningful outcomes would certainly include the real societal cost of healthcare, the experience of patients, and measurable health and quality of life outcomes. Such future research should include qualitative analysis that can examine the context of patient care in ways that clarifies the appropriateness of traditional metrics and clarifies real determinates of value, feasibility, and sustainability for the new models that may not be identifiable at the outset of an investigation. We need to be thoughtful in using data differently, emphasizing meaningful engagement with the stakeholders of the process, and challenging traditional paradigms to redesign healthcare delivery. True change needs to be rooted in fundamental redesign at the macro-structural level beyond the confines of the healthcare system as we better align healthcare systems within their community resource base and developing foundational support for better self-management. The promise and opportunity for PCMH transformation and other innovative efforts at care redesign is to develop and rigorously evaluate clinical workflows and roles that considers the full spectrum of patient needs and align with community partners to mitigate the impact of the macrosocial drivers of health. The Solberg article illustrates how true transformation is more than just checking boxes and adding on new tasks; instead, it requires fundamental culture change and practice redesign.

    Competing interests: None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (12 February 2020)
    Page navigation anchor for Re:Medical Home Improves Diabetes Care - Key Ingredient is Care Management
    Re:Medical Home Improves Diabetes Care - Key Ingredient is Care Management
    • Robert Watkins, Private Practice Family Physician

    Is there any evidence that, all else being equal, having a care plan improves outcomes in patients with diabetes?

    Competing interests: None

    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (29 January 2020)
    Page navigation anchor for Medical Home Improves Diabetes Care - Key Ingredient is Care Management
    Medical Home Improves Diabetes Care - Key Ingredient is Care Management
    • Robert A. Gabbay, Chief Medical Officer

    This study aimed to determine whether positive diabetes measures are more prominent in primary care practices which are certified as medical homes compared to those which are not. The authors collected surveys from 416 adult practices in Minnesota on medical home practice systems and reviewed data on standardized diabetes measures. In this careful study, Solberg, Carlin, Peterson, and Eder found that PCMH-certified practices...

    Show More

    This study aimed to determine whether positive diabetes measures are more prominent in primary care practices which are certified as medical homes compared to those which are not. The authors collected surveys from 416 adult practices in Minnesota on medical home practice systems and reviewed data on standardized diabetes measures. In this careful study, Solberg, Carlin, Peterson, and Eder found that PCMH-certified practices had better diabetes quality measures. Uncertified practices were more likely to be rural and had a lower overall level of diabetes care, but had comparable patient populations to those certified as Medical Homes. A notable strength of the study population is that the groups of practices were mostly in the same geographic area and did not have disparate numbers of FQHCs.

    Interestingly, the two groups of practices were similar in their structure, as 74.9% of non-PCMH practices had medical home practice systems in place. The main differences between the certified and non-certified groups were in regards to coordinated care and care plans. We find this consistent with our work in Pennsylvania.

    The Pennsylvania Chronic Care Initiative was the largest early pilot of Medical Home implementation involving 150 primary care practices and 178 payers in a series of regional rollouts across the state. Using a positive deviance approach to examine practices that most improved diabetes measures, we identified a series of care management functions that were consistently present in practices that had improved their diabetes quality measures the most including care plans and functions of coordinated care (Taliani et al. 2013). Interestingly, the practices studied in Minnesota had an exceptionally high level of performance in terms of PCMH attributes at baseline, a tribute to the great work done over the years around system based care improvement across that state. This may have underestimated the overall impact of PCMH implementation given that, at baseline, many of the attributes of PCMH were present even in non-PCMH practices.

    The authors note that their 2010 study showed that those practices which ultimately received Medical Home certification improved most in the years leading up to their certification. Those practices which had not yet been certified actually exhibited greater rates of improvement, which suggests that there may be a plateau in quality improvement after the first year or two of certification. This raises the question of the details of the funding allocation to practices and possibly how these funds were utilized. As care management was shown in the present study to be an area of difference between certified vs. non-certified practices, there may have been particular investments made toward care management early in the period of attaining certification that may have not persisted. This plateau may be an interesting trend, the causes of which are worth exploring to help identify how to continue to foster quality improvement.

    References:

    1. Solberg LI, Carlin C, Peterson KA, Eder M. Differences in Diabetes Care With and Without Certification as a Medical Home. Ann Fam Med. 2020; 18(1): 66-72.

    2. Taliani CA, Bricker PL, Adelman AM, Cronholm PF, Gabbay RA. Implementing effective care management in the patient-centered medical home. Am J Manag Care. 2013; 19(12): 957-964.

    Competing interests: None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 18 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 18 (1)
Vol. 18, Issue 1
January/February 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Differences in Diabetes Care With and Without Certification as a Medical Home
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Differences in Diabetes Care With and Without Certification as a Medical Home
Leif I. Solberg, Caroline Carlin, Kevin A. Peterson, Milton Eder
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2020, 18 (1) 66-72; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2492

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Differences in Diabetes Care With and Without Certification as a Medical Home
Leif I. Solberg, Caroline Carlin, Kevin A. Peterson, Milton Eder
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2020, 18 (1) 66-72; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2492
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Successful Change Management Strategies for Improving Diabetes Care Delivery Among High-Performing Practices
  • COVID-19 Impacts on Primary Care Clinic Care Management Processes
  • Strategies and Factors Associated With Top Performance in Primary Care for Diabetes: Insights From a Mixed Methods Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Primary Care and Its Patient-Level Variation: An American Family Cohort Study
  • Performance-Based Reimbursement, Illegitimate Tasks, Moral Distress, and Quality Care in Primary Care: A Mediation Model of Longitudinal Data
  • Adverse Outcomes Associated With Inhaled Corticosteroid Use in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
  • Person groups:
    • Community / population health
  • Other topics:
    • Quality improvement
    • Patient-centered medical home

Keywords

  • diabetes mellitus
  • organizational innovation
  • patient-centered care
  • primary health care
  • quality assurance
  • health care
  • practice-based research

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine