Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Structural Racism in Newborn Drug Testing: Perspectives of Health Care and Child Protective Services Professionals

Carol Shetty, Lauren Oshman, Amanda Costa, Victoria Waidley, Emily Madlambayan, Madgean Joassaint, Katharine McCabe, Courtney Townsel, Justine P. Wu, Christopher J. Frank and P. Paul Chandanabhumma
The Annals of Family Medicine July 2024, 22 (4) 271-278; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3139
Carol Shetty
1Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren Oshman
1Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
2Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda Costa
3Department of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victoria Waidley
4Department of Family Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily Madlambayan
5College of Literature, Science, and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Madgean Joassaint
5College of Literature, Science, and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katharine McCabe
6Women and Gender Studies Department, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Courtney Townsel
7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justine P. Wu
1Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
2Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher J. Frank
1Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
2Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Paul Chandanabhumma
1Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
2Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pchandan@umich.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Explanatory framework of potential influences of structural racism on health care professional decision making in newborn drug testing.

    CAPTA = Child Abuse and Prevention Treatment Act; CPS = child protective services; HCP = health care professional; NDT = newborn drug testing.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of Study Participants (N = 26)

    CharacteristicNo. (%)
    Role
    Certified nurse midwife  5 (17)
    CPS professional  4 (13)
    Nurse  4 (13)
    Physician (attending)a12 (40)
    Physician (resident)b  4 (13)
    Social worker 1 (3)
    Age, y
    20-29 2 (8)
    30-3910 (38)
    40-49  7 (27)
    ≥50  7 (27)
    Gender identityc
    Woman24 (92%)
    Man  2 (8%)
    Race/Ethnicityd
    Arab  1 (4)
    Asian  1 (4)
    Black/African American    3 (12)
    Hispanic  1 (4)
    Mixed  1 (4)
    White/Caucasian22 (85)
    Years in practice
    0-5  5 (19)
    6-10  6 (23)
    11-15  4 (15)
    ≥1611 (42)
    Years at institution
    0-5  5 (19)
    6-1011 (42)
    11-15  5 (19)
    ≥16  4 (15)
    • CPS = child protective services.

    • Note: Data from 26 of 30 participants that agreed to provide demographic information. Valid or non-missing values are used for calculation of percentages.

    • ↵a Attending physicians: 6 in pediatrics, 3 in family medicine, 2 in obstetrics/gynecology, and 1 in pediatric medicine.

    • ↵b Resident physicians: 2 in pediatrics, 1 in family medicine, and 1 in obstetrics/gynecology.

    • ↵c Participants self-identified their gender identity in a short open-ended answer.

    • ↵d Participants self-identified their race/ethnicity in a short open-ended answer and could select more than 1.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Themes and Representative Quotations

    SubthemesQuotations
    Theme 1. Levels of racisim beyond the hospital structure contributed to higher rates of NDT for Black newborns
    Negative historical views of drug use in Black communities“We pretend to ourselves, we call it risk-based screening, but it automatically assumes that a woman of color is more at risk to use than others. I think it’s this long-standing implicit bias coming out of the 80s and the war on drugs. I think that there’s an implicit bias that women of color will use heavier than [White] women do and so therefore there’s an increased level of harm.” (CNM, P19)
    Racialized views of contemporary drug use patterns“Whether [they] are intentional or not, there are definitely associations that we make that are involuntary associating skin color and substance use. Marijuana use in particular is nearly ubiquitous, but with the patients that I take care of, I have an association in my mind with my African American patients.” (Family medicine attending, P16)
    Racialized poverty, barriers, and lack of access to early prenatal care“Poor Black single women and their babies are tested more frequently … maybe they have more limited prenatal care … It is just a very complex situation that doesn’t mean that your first go-to should be a drug screen.” (Nurse, P22)
    Drug testing is used to police Black culture, related to race discordance between staff and patients“Our staff is mainly higher socioeconomic status … and more Caucasian than not. So, I think cultural norms of interactions within a healthcare setting, and I think when families express questions differently or have different coping mechanisms people can become frustrated or think that something is going on.” (Pediatrics attending, P1)
    NDT is an aggression like obstetrical racism“Seeing in numbers and graphs really hits home to prenatal providers how different it is and how women of color are targeted in so many ways. We have the maternal morbidity and mortality rate and stuff but it’s all these other little—not even micro aggressions—these other aggressions like access to prenatal care and access to mental health.” (CNM, P19)
    Theme 2. Inconsistent hospital policies led to racialized application of state law and downstream CPS reporting
    State law is too ambiguous to apply“I think it would be very, very helpful to get more clarity in the state law. I almost feel like nobody has clarity including the state.” (Family medicine attending, P17)
    Lack of clear policy leads to bias“I’m concerned that when it’s not a streamlined set criteria and it’s more subjective that it can be used for some populations and not others, and I think that leads to bias, or is the result of bias. Which is concerning for me.” (Nurse, P22)
    HCPs retain discretion to not order NDT which creates inequity“If there’s a fancy [White] professor who just smokes weed every now and then … people may not order the drug screen … but that’s not equitable.” (CNM, P24)
    Theme 3. HCP knowledge of benefits and disproportionate harms of CPS reporting on Black families influenced their testing decision making
    Lack of knowledge following CPS reporting“I don’t know what happens when CPS is contacted. I know that they meet with the family, I know they do a home visit.” (Pediatrician, P2)
    Need for child protection when risk of PSE exists“The drug screen is more to have objective concrete data to satisfy legal aspects of things versus safety … Without that test we can’t protect the baby.” (Pediatrician, P9)
    Goal of sending NDT results is to protect children“My goal is to ensure that we have a safe place for kiddos, and to ensure that if parents need additional help and resources that we are able to get them additional help and resources to have a family thrive.” (Pediatrician, P3)
    CPS provides resources“CPS does do a one-time visit strictly whether or not this mother has appropriate resources and doesn’t need additional help in taking care of their child. To some degree [CPS is] supposed to be more like a resource safety net for helping mom and baby.” (Pediatrics attending, P26)
    Substance exposure alone does not merit opening a case against the family“Substance exposure, in and of itself is not a reason for us to investigate. So also, you know when those mandated reporters typically call me, and we have to dig and ask more questions and see if there’s some other neglect tied to it.” (CPS professional, P10)
    No permanent CPS record for isolated substance exposure“When we all have isolated marijuana use—and no other issues—all CPS does is investigate but they don’t open an actual case. So, in the scheme of things, there’s nothing on this record under CPS for this family.” (Social worker, P7)
    CPS creates mistrust“It feels like to me that [a CPS report is] mostly a punitive thing that then ties up the medical community into more mistrust of the medical community which happens more because of history in Black and brown communities of having some level of mistrust of doctors.” (Family medicine attending, P18)
    Risk of CPS reporting creates unsafe system for Black people to disclose drug use“[Black] people are taught that we have to wear a certain mask when we come into health care and that there are certain things [like drug use] that we should not bring up and … certain things that you know you’re going to be treated badly for.” (CNM, P24)
    CPS can reduce harm by providing resources instead of opening an investigation“Instead of putting them into our system where we don’t know what could potentially happen as they move through, we actually go the other route and give them those preventive services. And so that we’re only bringing the people in who truly are suspected of abuse and neglect.” (CPS professional, P10)
    • CNM = certified nurse midwife; CPS = child protective services; HCP = health care professional; NDT = newborn drug testing; PSE = prenatal substance exposure.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX IN PDF FILE BELOW

    Supplemental Appendix. Structural Racism in Newborn Drug Testing: Healthcare and Child Protective Professional Perspectives Interview Guide

    • 271-SupplementalAppendix.pdf -

      PDF FILE

  • VISUAL ABSTRACT IN PNG FILE BELOW

    • ChandanabhummaVisualAbstract.png -

      PNG file

  • PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY OF ARTICLE

    Original Research

    Structural Racism and Inconsistent Hospital Policies Result in Health Care Professionals Disproportionately Testing Black Newborns for Prenatal Drug Exposure 

     Background and Goal:Black birthing parents and their newborns disproportionately experience newborn drug testing for prenatal substance exposure by health care professionals. This practice contributes to Child Protective Services reporting, family separation, and termination of parental rights. This qualitative study, conducted at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, MI, explored knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of health care professionals and Child Protective Services professionals regarding the influence of structural racism on inequities in newborn drug testing practices.

    Study Approach:This qualitative analysis is the third qualitative phase of a larger antiracist, justice-informed, community-engaged, multiphase mixed methods study. For this phase, researchers conducted semi-structured interviews between May 2021 and October 2022 with 30 physicians, midwives, nurses, social workers, and Child Protective Services professionals. Researchers also conducted inductive, reflexive thematic analysis, using elements of the Levels of Racism Framework, the Theoretical Domains Framework, and the Public Health Critical Race Praxis. 

     Main Results:Researchers identified three primary themes: (A) Levels of racism beyond the hospital structure contributed to higher rates of drug testing of Black newborns; (B) Inconsistent hospital policies led to racialized application of state law and downstream Child Protective Services reporting; and (C) health care professionals’ knowledge of the benefits and disproportionate harms of Child Protective Services reporting on Black families influenced their testing decision making.

    Why It Matters:Health care professionals recognized structural racism as a driver of disproportionate newborn drug testing, but their beliefs, lack of knowledge, and skill limitations were barriers to dismantling power structures impeding systems-level change.

    There will be an accompanying Annals of Family Medicine Podcast episode in which lead authors and researchers, Dr. Carol Shetty and Dr. Lauren Oshman, discuss this important study in detail. The episode will be accessible on July 22nd at 5 PM here.

    Visual Abstract:

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (4)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 22 (4)
Vol. 22, Issue 4
July/August 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain-Language Summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Structural Racism in Newborn Drug Testing: Perspectives of Health Care and Child Protective Services Professionals
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Structural Racism in Newborn Drug Testing: Perspectives of Health Care and Child Protective Services Professionals
Carol Shetty, Lauren Oshman, Amanda Costa, Victoria Waidley, Emily Madlambayan, Madgean Joassaint, Katharine McCabe, Courtney Townsel, Justine P. Wu, Christopher J. Frank, P. Paul Chandanabhumma
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2024, 22 (4) 271-278; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3139

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Structural Racism in Newborn Drug Testing: Perspectives of Health Care and Child Protective Services Professionals
Carol Shetty, Lauren Oshman, Amanda Costa, Victoria Waidley, Emily Madlambayan, Madgean Joassaint, Katharine McCabe, Courtney Townsel, Justine P. Wu, Christopher J. Frank, P. Paul Chandanabhumma
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2024, 22 (4) 271-278; DOI: 10.1370/afm.3139
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Stop Testing Black Babies!
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family-Based Interventions to Promote Weight Management in Adults: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India
  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Vulnerable populations
  • Methods:
    • Qualitative methods
  • Other topics:
    • Ethics
    • Racism
    • Disparities in health and health care

Keywords

  • child abuse
  • health inequities
  • racism
  • implicit bias
  • qualitative research

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine