Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal ResearchA

Offering Annual Fecal Occult Blood Tests at Annual Flu Shot Clinics Increases Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates

Michael B. Potter, La Phengrasamy, Esther S. Hudes, Stephen J. McPhee and Judith M.E. Walsh
The Annals of Family Medicine January 2009, 7 (1) 17-23; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.934
Michael B. Potter
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
La Phengrasamy
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Esther S. Hudes
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen J. McPhee
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith M.E. Walsh
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Next Question: Will practices take advantage of these ideas?
    Michael B. Potter
    Published on: 30 January 2009
  • Thinking outside of the clinic visit box
    Richard M. Hoffman
    Published on: 29 January 2009
  • Multiple Strategies Needed to Maximize Screening Rates
    Michael B. Potter
    Published on: 16 January 2009
  • Increasing CRC Screening by Employing Ancillary Staff
    Theodore R. Levin
    Published on: 15 January 2009
  • Published on: (30 January 2009)
    Page navigation anchor for Next Question: Will practices take advantage of these ideas?
    Next Question: Will practices take advantage of these ideas?
    • Michael B. Potter, San Francisco, CA

    Since our paper was published, we have received quite a bit of positive feedback from fellow researchers, for which we are grateful.

    The next question, however, is what would it take for the FLU-FOBT Program to become a commonly used tool in clinical practice?

    In future work, we hope to explore opportunities to promote widespread adoption of this program in clinical practice. As we prepare for tha...

    Show More

    Since our paper was published, we have received quite a bit of positive feedback from fellow researchers, for which we are grateful.

    The next question, however, is what would it take for the FLU-FOBT Program to become a commonly used tool in clinical practice?

    In future work, we hope to explore opportunities to promote widespread adoption of this program in clinical practice. As we prepare for that, we will be grateful to hear ideas from "Annals of Family Medicine" readers, especially practicing clinicians, about what they see as incentives and barriers to implementation of the FLU-FOBT Program in their own practice settings.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (29 January 2009)
    Page navigation anchor for Thinking outside of the clinic visit box
    Thinking outside of the clinic visit box
    • Richard M. Hoffman, Albuquerque, USA

    Potter and colleagues achieved an impressive increase in colorectal cancer screening rates with a creative intervention to offer patients FOBT test kits when they came for flu shots. Intervening in their study population was particularly challenging given the need to develop educational material about colorectal cancer screening in 5 languages and the relatively high proportion of uninsured patients. A number of fa...

    Show More

    Potter and colleagues achieved an impressive increase in colorectal cancer screening rates with a creative intervention to offer patients FOBT test kits when they came for flu shots. Intervening in their study population was particularly challenging given the need to develop educational material about colorectal cancer screening in 5 languages and the relatively high proportion of uninsured patients. A number of factors contributed to the study’s success, including an electronic medical record that identified patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening in advance of their flu shot clinic visit, sufficient non-physician personnel to offer screening and to follow up patients who did not promptly return stool test kits, and resources to ensure that patients testing positive had access to diagnostic evaluations. However, perhaps the most important feature of the study was designing an intervention that did not require a primary care clinic visit. Expecting preventive services to be consistently delivered during clinic visits is increasingly unrealistic. Even offering the relatively limited number of interventions recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force would consume many hours a day of primary care time. The need to also address a multitude of competing medical and psychosocial problems, especially with an inefficient screening test reminder and tracking system, further undermines a clinician’s ability to effectively deliver preventive care. With the dwindling number of trainees entering primary care, non-visit based care provided by non-physicians will become an increasingly important strategy for delivering preventive care. Integrating this strategy with a comprehensive electronic health record may allow a health care system to more effectively and efficiently deliver preventive services to its entire population of eligible patients.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (16 January 2009)
    Page navigation anchor for Multiple Strategies Needed to Maximize Screening Rates
    Multiple Strategies Needed to Maximize Screening Rates
    • Michael B. Potter, San Francisco, CA

    I appreciate these supportive comments. While the presence or absence of a doctor's recommendation within the context of a clinical office visit is frequently cited as the most important determinant of colorectal cancer screening behavior, we believe that there is much that can be done outside the context of physician visits to facilitate screening. In fact, given that FOBT and FIT are home tests that must be done annu...

    Show More

    I appreciate these supportive comments. While the presence or absence of a doctor's recommendation within the context of a clinical office visit is frequently cited as the most important determinant of colorectal cancer screening behavior, we believe that there is much that can be done outside the context of physician visits to facilitate screening. In fact, given that FOBT and FIT are home tests that must be done annually to achieve maximal benefit, it is likely that, in order to maximize screening rates in diverse clinical settings, multiple strategies may need to be employed, including: (1) promotion by clinicians in the context of an office visit; (2) promotion by non-physician staff who interact with patients before or after doctor visits, (3) routine mailing of kits to patients who are due; and (4) at other times when patients come into contact with the medical system, such as when they are coming in for an annual flu shot. We believe that offering FOBT or FIT at the time of flu shots reinforces other efforts to achieve annual screening, and it has the potential to create new community norms through the message that, just like flu shots, for patients who are not already up to date with other methods of colorectal cancer screening, FOBT/FIT saves lives and should be done every year after age 50.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Published on: (15 January 2009)
    Page navigation anchor for Increasing CRC Screening by Employing Ancillary Staff
    Increasing CRC Screening by Employing Ancillary Staff
    • Theodore R. Levin, Walnut Creek, California

    Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is widely recommended but underused. This is due in part to confusion about the menu of available options, and in part to a lack of primary care physician resources (ie, time) to explain screening to patients.

    Potter and colleagues have demonstrated a highly successful intervention to increase CRC screening. In my view, success was achieved through the following mechanisms: 1...

    Show More

    Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is widely recommended but underused. This is due in part to confusion about the menu of available options, and in part to a lack of primary care physician resources (ie, time) to explain screening to patients.

    Potter and colleagues have demonstrated a highly successful intervention to increase CRC screening. In my view, success was achieved through the following mechanisms: 1) The use of ancillary staff to invite screening participation; 2) This occurred outside of a typical phyisician office visit for an unrelated medical problem, among highly motivated, prevention oriented patients who were coming in anyway for flu shots; 3) The use of a simple, easy to perform, non-invasive test, with adequate training and explanation.

    Now that we have these data, the time has come to implement broad based interventions to increase screening rates using tests that are acceptable to a broad portion of our population.

    Competing interests:   None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 7 (1)
Vol. 7, Issue 1
1 Jan 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Offering Annual Fecal Occult Blood Tests at Annual Flu Shot Clinics Increases Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Offering Annual Fecal Occult Blood Tests at Annual Flu Shot Clinics Increases Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates
Michael B. Potter, La Phengrasamy, Esther S. Hudes, Stephen J. McPhee, Judith M.E. Walsh
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2009, 7 (1) 17-23; DOI: 10.1370/afm.934

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Offering Annual Fecal Occult Blood Tests at Annual Flu Shot Clinics Increases Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates
Michael B. Potter, La Phengrasamy, Esther S. Hudes, Stephen J. McPhee, Judith M.E. Walsh
The Annals of Family Medicine Jan 2009, 7 (1) 17-23; DOI: 10.1370/afm.934
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know
  • Feasibility of a call-in centre to deliver colorectal cancer screening in primary care
  • System-Based Participatory Research in Health Care: An Approach for Sustainable Translational Research and Quality Improvement
  • Implementation Insights
  • Annals Journal Club: Symbiosis Instead of Competing Demands: A Tale of Two Preventive Services
  • The Aftermath of Efficacy
  • The Complexity of and Opportunity for Screening in Primary Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Neighborhood Determinants of Primary Care Access in Virginia
  • Proactive Deprescribing Among Older Adults With Polypharmacy: Barriers and Enablers
  • Artificial Intelligence Tools for Preconception Cardiomyopathy Screening Among Women of Reproductive Age
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Prevention
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other topics:
    • Quality improvement
    • Organizational / practice change

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine