Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Patient Satisfaction With Medical Care for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pain Research Registry Study

John C. Licciardone, Salman Patel, Prathima Kandukuri, George Beeton, Ramyashree Nyalakonda and Subhash Aryal
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2023, 21 (2) 125-131; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2949
John C. Licciardone
1University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas
DO, MS, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: john.licciardone@unthsc.edu
Salman Patel
1University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Prathima Kandukuri
1University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George Beeton
1University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramyashree Nyalakonda
1University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Subhash Aryal
2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Flow of participants.

    PRECISION = Pain Registry for Epidemiological, Clinical, and Interventional Studies and Innovation.

    Note: Participants were not required to have a physician who treated their low back pain when the registry was established in 2016, and data on the patient-physician relationship were not routinely collected until later that year.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Participant Characteristics at Registry Enrollment

    CharacteristicOverall Sample
    (N = 1,352)
    Long-Term Medical Care Subgroup
    (n = 355)
    Age y, mean (SD)      53.3 (13.1)      56.3 (11.8)
    Gender, No. (%)
      Female1,009 (74.6)255 (71.8)
      Male    343 (25.4)100 (28.2)
    Race, No. (%)
      American Indian/Alaska Native   19 (1.4)  5 (1.4)
      Asian   20 (1.5)  4 (1.1)
      Black   232 (17.2)  45 (12.7)
      Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander     4 (0.3)  1 (0.3)
      White1,077 (79.7)300 (84.5)
    Medical comorbidities, No. (%)
      Herniated disc   536 (39.6)163 (45.9)
      Sciatica   676 (50.0)204 (57.5)
      Osteoarthritis   622 (46.0)189 (53.2)
      Osteoporosis   189 (14.0)  59 (16.6)
      Hypertension   591 (43.7)183 (51.5)
      Heart disease   149 (11.0)  50 (14.1)
      Diabetes mellitus   261 (19.3)  75 (21.1)
      Asthma   359 (26.6)  96 (27.0)
      Depression   778 (57.5)208 (58.6)
    Process for delivering medical care for chronic low back pain, mean (SD)
      Physician communication (overall CBQ score)         66.3 (22.4)      71.1 (22.3)
      Physician empathy (overall CARE score)         70.9 (29.1)      74.3 (29.4)
    Current physician prescribing of opioids for low back pain, No. (%)
      Yes   445 (32.9)135 (38.0)
      No   907 (67.1)220 (62.0)
    Outcomes of medical care for chronic low back pain, mean (SD)
      Pain intensity (NRS score)       6.1 (1.8)      6.0 (1.9)
      Back-related disability (RMDQ score)    14.5 (5.7)    14.6 (5.7)
      Health-related quality-of-life deficits (SPADE cluster score)    58.0 (6.9)    58.0 (7.2)
      Patient satisfaction with medical care for chronic low back pain (PSQ-18 score)     62.6 (28.1)    65.1 (28.5)
    • CARE = Consultation and Relational Empathy measure; CBQ = Communication Behavior Questionnaire; NRS = numerical rating scale for low back pain intensity; PSQ-18 = Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (18 items); RMDQ = Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; SPADE = sleep disturbance, pain interference with activities, anxiety, depression, low energy or fatigue.

    • Note: Higher scores represent better physician communication, greater physician empathy, and greater patient satisfaction on the CBQ, CARE, and PSQ-18, respectively, whereas higher scores represent worse outcomes on the NRS for pain intensity, RMDQ for back-related disability, and SPADE cluster for health-related quality-of-life deficits.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Factors Associated With Patient Satisfaction With Medical Care for Chronic Low Back Pain (N = 1,352)

    FactorUnivariable AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
    Standardized β (95% Cl)tP ValueStandardized β (95% Cl)tP Value
    Age, y  0.095 (0.042 to 0.148)  3.50<.001  0.054 (0.018 to 0.090)  2.97  .003
    Female (vs male)−0.001 (−0.054 to 0.052)−0.03  .97  0.001 (−0.031 to 0.033)  0.05  .96
    Racial minority group (vs White)  0.042 (−0.011 to 0.096)  1.56  .12  0.019 (−0.015 to 0.052)  1.08  .28
    No. of medical comorbidities−0.029 (−0.082 to 0.025)−1.06  .29−0.019 (−0.058 to 0.019)−1.00  .32
    Physician communication (overall CBQ score)  0.671 (0.632 to 0.711)33.26<.001  0.182 (0.133 to 0.232)  7.22<.001
    Physician empathy (overall CARE score)  0.789 (0.756 to 0.822)47.18<.001  0.638 (0.588 to 0.688)25.14<.001
    Current physician prescribing of opioids for low back pain  0.046 (−0.007 to 0.100)  1.70  .09−0.003 (−0.037 to 0.032)−0.15  .88
    Low back pain intensity (NRS score)−0.043 (−0.096 to 0.011)−1.57  .12  0.036 (−0.001 to 0.074)  1.91  .06
    Back-related disability (RMDQ score)−0.129 (−0.182 to −0.076)−4.78<.001−0.022 (−0.067 to 0.024)−0.94  .35
    Health-related quality-of-life deficits (SPADE cluster score)−0.188 (−0.241 to −0.136)−7.05<.001−0.054 (−0.098 to −0.010)−2.41  .02
    • CARE = Consultation and Relational Empathy measure; CBQ = Communication Behavior Questionnaire; NRS = numerical rating scale for low back pain intensity; PSQ-18 = Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (18 items); RMDQ = Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; SPADE = sleep disturbance, pain interference with activities, anxiety, depression, low energy or fatigue.

    • Note: Results are based on linear regression models with the table factors as independent variables and the general satisfaction score on the PSQ-18 as the dependent variable. All factors listed in the table were used to compute the adjusted results in the multivariable analysis. Positive and negative standardized β coefficients are associated with increased and decreased patient satisfaction scores, respectively.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Factors Associated With Patient Satisfaction With Medical Care for Chronic Low Back Pain in the Long-Term Medical Care Subgroup (n = 355)

    FactorUnivariable AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
    Standardized β (95% Cl)tP ValueStandardized β (95% Cl)tP Value
    Age, y  0.102 (−0.002 to 0.206)  1.93  .05  0.055 (−0.012 to 0.122)  1.63  .10
    Female (vs male)  0.054 (−0.051 to 0.158)  1.01  .31  0.042 (−0.015 to 0.100)  1.45  .15
    Racial minority group (vs White)  0.081 (−0.023 to 0.185)  1.52  .13  0.095 (0.034 to 0.155)  3.09  .002
    No. of medical comorbidities−0.004 (−0.109 to 0.101)−0.08  .94−0.002 (−0.072 to 0.068)−0.06  .96
    Physician communication (overall CBQ score)  0.751 (0.682 to 0.820)21.37<.001  0.208 (0.105 to 0.311)  3.96<.001
    Physician empathy (overall CARE score)  0.826 (0.767 to 0.885)27.56<.001  0.633 (0.529 to 0.737)11.95<.001
    Current physician prescribing of opioids for low back pain  0.110 (0.006 to 0.214)  2.08  .04  0.009 (−0.051 to 0.069)  0.29  .77
    Low back pain intensity (NRS score)−0.077 (−0.181 to 0.027)−1.45  .15−0.018 (−0.085 to 0.049)−0.53  .60
    Back-related disability (RMDQ score)−0.142 (−0.245 to −0.038)−2.69  .008  0.016 (−0.068 to 0.100)  0.37  .72
    Health-related quality-of-life deficits (SPADE cluster score)−0.238 (−0.340 to −0.136)−4.61<.001−0.085 (−0.168 to −0.001)−2.00  .05
    • CARE = Consultation and Relational Empathy measure; CBQ = Communication Behavior Questionnaire; NRS = numerical rating scale for low back pain intensity; PSQ-18 = Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (18 items); RMDQ = Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; SPADE = sleep disturbance, pain interference with activities, anxiety, depression, low energy or fatigue.

    • Note: Results are based on linear regression models with the table factors as independent variables and the general satisfaction score on the PSQ-18 as the dependent variable. All factors listed in the table were used to compute the adjusted results in the multivariable analysis. Positive and negative standardized β coefficients are associated with increased and decreased patient satisfaction scores, respectively.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 21 (2)
Vol. 21, Issue 2
March/April 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Plain-Language Article Summaries
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patient Satisfaction With Medical Care for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pain Research Registry Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Patient Satisfaction With Medical Care for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pain Research Registry Study
John C. Licciardone, Salman Patel, Prathima Kandukuri, George Beeton, Ramyashree Nyalakonda, Subhash Aryal
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2023, 21 (2) 125-131; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2949

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Patient Satisfaction With Medical Care for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pain Research Registry Study
John C. Licciardone, Salman Patel, Prathima Kandukuri, George Beeton, Ramyashree Nyalakonda, Subhash Aryal
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2023, 21 (2) 125-131; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2949
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Artificial Intelligence Tools for Preconception Cardiomyopathy Screening Among Women of Reproductive Age
  • Family Physicians in Focused Practice in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Level Study of Trends From 1993/1994 Through 2021/2022
  • Seven Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care Electronic Visits: Qualitative Study of Staff and Patient Views
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Health services
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Personalized care
  • Other topics:
    • Communication / decision making
    • Patient perspectives

Keywords

  • patient satisfaction
  • chronic low back pain
  • physician communication
  • physician empathy
  • opioid prescribing

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine