Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Practice-Based Referrals to a Tobacco Cessation Quit Line: Assessing the Impact of Comparative Feedback vs General Reminders

William C. Wadland, Jodi Summers Holtrop, David Weismantel, Pramod K. Pathak, Huda Fadel and Jeff Powell
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2007, 5 (2) 135-142; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.650
William C. Wadland
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jodi Summers Holtrop
PhD, CHES
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Weismantel
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pramod K. Pathak
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huda Fadel
MPH, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeff Powell
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Example of a Quit Line referral report.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Clinician referrals to Quit Line by quarter.

    Mantel-Haenszel χ2: P <.001.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Participant disposition and summary outcomes.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of Participating Practices

    CharacteristicTotal No.Interventin No.Control No.PValue
    * χ2 test.
    † t test.
    Recruited, No.874344
    Location, No..69*
        Southeast Michigan1697
        Mid-Michigan231013
        Southwest Michigan17107
        Northern Michigan311417
    Size of community, No..83*
        <5,0001064
        5,000–10,000734
        10,000–25,000261214
        25,000–100,000231013
        >100,00021129
    Proximity to major city, No..76*
        Not within 25 miles291514
        Within 25 miles582830
    Practice type, No..72*
        Solo1367
        2-person16610
        Group practice372017
        Multispecialty group practice211110
    Patients aged >65 years, mean % (SD)24.7 (17.8)21.0 (15.4).34†
    Patients white, non-Hispanic, mean % (SD)78.0 (23.6)82.2 (19.0).38†
    Patients uninsured / Medicaid, mean % (SD)19.5 (18.4)23.3 (20.2).40†
    Estimated smoker visits per quarter, total No.22,16323,537
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Characteristics of Participating Clinicians

    CharacteristicTotal No.Intervention No.Control No.PValue
    * χ2 test.
    † Fisher’s exact test.
    Recruited308163145
    Sex.69*
        Male1638875
        Female1457570
    Clinician type.95*
        Physician234124110
        Nurse-practitioner311714
        Physician’s assistant432221
    Specialty.45*
        Family medicine1718586
        Internal medicine885038
        Obstetrics-gynecology492821
    Smoking status.45†
        Current321
        Past482919
        Never254129125
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Estimated Quits by Level of Enrollment in Quit Line

    Enrollment StatusUsual Quit Rate (%)Intervention (n = 484)Control (n = 220)
    * Actual referrals x estimated quit rate = number of quits.
    Level 1, enrolled in Quit Line2573 × 0.25 = 18.2572 × 0.25 = 18.00
    Level 2, brochure and callbacks15126 × 0.15 = 18.9062 × 0.15 = 9.30
    No enrollment, clinician advice only10285 × 0.10 = 28.5086 × 0.10 = 8.60
    Total estimated quits65.6535.90
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Program Cost per Referral, Enrollee, and Quit

    OutcomeTotal $Intervention $Control $
    QTN = telephone Quit Line service.
    Total cost per outcome
        Cost per referral33.8938.6023.60
        Cost per QTN enrollee71.6593.6838.92
        Cost per quit235.88285.72145.28
    Incremental cost per outcome
        Cost per referral21.6923.5117.70
        Cost per QTN enrollee45.8557.0729.18
        Cost per quit150.93174.04108.93

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Appendix

    Supplemental Appendix. An Intraclass Correlation Model for a Physician-Based Sampling Scheme.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental data: Appendix - PDF file, 2 pages, 94KB
  • The Article in Brief

    Practice-Based Referral Rates to a Tobacco Cessation Quit Line: Assessing the Impact of Comparative Feedback vs General Reminders

    William C. Wadland, MD, MS, and colleagues

    Background This study compares two methods of encouraging doctors to refer patients who smoke to a telephone quit line. The methods are comparative feedback (doctors receive information comparing their rates of referring patients to the quit line with those of other doctors, particularly with other doctors who refer at high rates) and postcards reminding them about quit line services. The quit line is a 24-hour service staffed by trained nurses who counsel callers in how to quit smoking and keep from starting again.

    What This Study Found Doctors who receive comparative feedback refer patients to a smoking quit line at higher rates than doctors who receive a postcard reminder. The estimated number of referred smokers who quit was 66 in the feedback group and 36 in the postcard reminder group. The added cost to develop feedback information was about $65 per estimated patient who quits smoking.

    Implications

    • Comparative feedback on referrals to a smoking quit line had a modest effect on doctors.
    • The additional cost of providing feedback information is small considering the effectiveness of the feedback method and the long-term health benefits of stopping smoking.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 5 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 5 (2)
Vol. 5, Issue 2
1 Mar 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Practice-Based Referrals to a Tobacco Cessation Quit Line: Assessing the Impact of Comparative Feedback vs General Reminders
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 15 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Practice-Based Referrals to a Tobacco Cessation Quit Line: Assessing the Impact of Comparative Feedback vs General Reminders
William C. Wadland, Jodi Summers Holtrop, David Weismantel, Pramod K. Pathak, Huda Fadel, Jeff Powell
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2007, 5 (2) 135-142; DOI: 10.1370/afm.650

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Practice-Based Referrals to a Tobacco Cessation Quit Line: Assessing the Impact of Comparative Feedback vs General Reminders
William C. Wadland, Jodi Summers Holtrop, David Weismantel, Pramod K. Pathak, Huda Fadel, Jeff Powell
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2007, 5 (2) 135-142; DOI: 10.1370/afm.650
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • On TRACK: Primary Care Opportunities for Filling Unmet Need
  • In This Issue: Real Change Is Real Hard in the Real World
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Convenience or Continuity: When Are Patients Willing to Wait to See Their Own Doctor?
  • Feasibility and Acceptability of the “About Me” Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment
  • Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Primary Care and Its Patient-Level Variation: An American Family Cohort Study
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Health promotion
  • Person groups:
    • Community / population health
  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other topics:
    • Quality improvement
    • Organizational / practice change

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine